Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   When A 777A Retires........ (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/90414-when-777a-retires.html)

notEnuf 09-07-2015 10:25 AM


Originally Posted by Schwanker (Post 1966003)
With respect to OE recovery, I posted this a couple weeks ago in the SLC Capt rep resigns thread. Applicable here:

Recovery:
It must include the following or NFW:
1. Drop trip paid 100%
2. Assigned Trip paid 100%
3. Assigned trip must fall in the footprint of the original trip, premium pay for anything outside.
4. Positive space to/from new trip
5. In base lodging provided if needed for assigned trip

This would give them the productivity they so desire and also benefit the pilot being removed for OE.

This is still a concession if we agree to it and must be monetized accordingly. Personally, I prefer the choice WS or GS and whether I want to work, all though I always have picked up something.

Carl Spackler 09-07-2015 10:36 AM


Originally Posted by notEnuf (Post 1966041)
This is still a concession if we agree to it and must be monetized accordingly. Personally, I prefer the choice WS or GS and whether I want to work, all though I always have picked up something.

Any change would have to be a win for pilots and absolutely NO job losses. Not even one single job.

Carl

notEnuf 09-07-2015 11:13 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1966047)
Any change would have to be a win for pilots and absolutely NO job losses. Not even one single job.

Carl

Agrred. Monetized may not have been the right word. We can't just give this up is my point. I'm not sure how you measure job loss or future job loss on this one though. I think any productivity improvements will lessen future pilots required. If you mean snap back for furlough protection, I get it but paying for furlough protection never works.

forgot to bid 09-07-2015 01:42 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1965914)
If Orville's theory of extreme managerial angst over pilots staying home is true, then here's the fix: If FO is removed from trip for LCA, removed FO shall occupy a first class seat (domestic) or business class seat (international) for every leg of his bid trip. This is "important" to ensure operational integrity in case of trainee pilot illness or unsat performance.

This will obviously cost management thousands in lost revenue every leg and much more than letting the FO stay home, but at least that lazy FO won't be staying home. Let's see if that doesn't unmask what their real angst is over this.

Carl - Management's problem solver

I think that's the only fair way to do it.

And we accumulate miles.

orvil 09-07-2015 02:10 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1966002)
It wouldn't be fleet dependent, it would be a contractual provision. The pulled FO must occupy a first class seat for every leg. That should end their "deep concern" about FO's being paid to stay home...right?

Carl

There is one mans solution. Awesome.

Just remember, everything they want in negotiations is about productivity. It was the theme throughout the departed agreement.

DAL73n 09-07-2015 02:20 PM


Originally Posted by orvil (Post 1965807)
Prior to the TA, there were some posts about RA speaking at a LCA meeting or something similar. The poster noted that he was all unglued about certain aspects of our contract that allowed pilots to sit at home and be paid. He viewed it as a management deficiency.

Fast forward to the TA, the problem has been solved from a management perspective. The fact that it abrogates the seniority of all FO's is a minor detail in management's view.

What we had with the TA was an attempt to solve the Company's perceived problem. We, meaning the MEC, bent over backwards to be "fair" with the Company. Because that's what they do in the era of Constructive Appeasement. Everyone involved, except the rank and file, were patting themselves on the back. They also failed to apply institutional memory to the issue. Well, the membership disagreed and applied the standard of fairness.

This issue will return. It's a priority for the Company and personal stick in the eye of management. Therefore, we need to fashion a solution that will address the needs of both sides. In my view, seniority is sacrosanct. It's a non-negotiable item. We have already paid a price to eliminate the onerous recovery obligation. The answer is somewhere in the middle. There is an answer, we just didn't find it in the TA.

The Company has a self-induced manning problem. It's all about productivity. As long as you remember this point, you will understand your adversary.

I'm a captain and it will never have to deal with this issue. But, I do believe in fairness. I will continue to apply that standard to this issue.

I fail to understand why it is up to us to solve management's problem. They elected to delay hiring until well after flight operations wanted to hire. They now have to pay through the nose in GS ans GSWC in order to keep the operation going. I see no reason to solve this problem with them without SUBSTANTIAL COMPENSATION. Also, the sick leave thing was about forcing guys to fly when they really shouldn't and that is never a good thing. When we used to be able to accrue sick from one year to the next there were guys that would call in no matter how sick so that they could get the last 1-2 years as paid time off.

RockyMtMadDog 09-07-2015 04:41 PM


Originally Posted by Scoop (Post 1965589)
Ok, so lets go back to the "old days."

Do you think the company would be willing to give us back:

A defined benefit pension.
Line of time bidding.
Trips touching our 7th week of vacation.
C2000 pay rates.

And whatever else made the "old days" so terrible. I think 65% of the Pilot group would be willing to vote for that.


Scoop

And back then, the company could ask for verification and a medical release at any time. In for a penny . . .

Purple Drank 09-07-2015 05:48 PM


Originally Posted by RockyMtMadDog (Post 1966206)
And back then, the company could ask for verification and a medical release at any time. In for a penny . . .

Enjoy your last few days on FPL lowering expectations and carrying the company's water.

RockyMtMadDog 09-07-2015 06:58 PM


Originally Posted by Purple Drank (Post 1966254)
Enjoy your last few days on FPL lowering expectations and carrying the company's water.

You assume too much. How about you debate the issue rather than continue with meaningless rhetoric.

forgot to bid 09-07-2015 07:40 PM


Originally Posted by Scoop (Post 1965589)
Ok, so lets go back to the "old days."

Do you think the company would be willing to give us back:

A defined benefit pension.
Line of time bidding.
Trips touching our 7th week of vacation.
C2000 pay rates.

And whatever else made the "old days" so terrible. I think 65% of the Pilot group would be willing to vote for that.


Scoop

I have a question, how much did it cost back then to have a baby with no complications?

Today, with this health care program we have, it costs a lot.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:39 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands