Phone Polling
10-25-2015 | 01:35 PM
#21
Runs with scissors
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Well C2000 certainly had some shortcomings, Scope comes to mind, but overall it was acceptable to a very, very large percentage of the DAL Pilots.
More importantly DALPA was a lot more aggressive in its approach back then vs. the timid approach we have just seen on the last TA.
No one can guarantee any certain result but we should at least have a union that will fight hard on our behalf.
The fact that some guys seem to think our only option is to take whatever management offers really boggles my mind.
Scoop
More importantly DALPA was a lot more aggressive in its approach back then vs. the timid approach we have just seen on the last TA.
No one can guarantee any certain result but we should at least have a union that will fight hard on our behalf.
The fact that some guys seem to think our only option is to take whatever management offers really boggles my mind.
Scoop
Yes, especially when the company is making historic profits every quarter, and using it to buy back stock! Last quarter, that's 90 days, Delta made nearly double what they made in the whole year of 2001, when we signed C2K, yet we are still being asked to give concessions to fund 3% pay raises.
Un-Be-Frick'n-Lieveable.
10-26-2015 | 05:42 AM
#22
Quality of Lifer
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 690
Likes: 5
From: M88A
Yes, especially when the company is making historic profits every quarter, and using it to buy back stock! Last quarter, that's 90 days, Delta made nearly double what they made in the whole year of 2001, when we signed C2K, yet we are still being asked to give concessions to fund 3% pay raises.
Un-Be-Frick'n-Lieveable.
Un-Be-Frick'n-Lieveable.
10-26-2015 | 04:59 PM
#23
Runs with scissors
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
10-26-2015 | 06:06 PM
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,527
Likes: 484
I'm afraid that if I answer yes to any "modification" questions it will be seen as willingness for concessions. For example I would be agreeable to modifications to JV that puts 75% of flying in the hands of Delta pilots. I am not agreeable to a modification that sacrifices one seat, one mile or one pound of cargo under a JV.
Last edited by Gunfighter; 10-26-2015 at 06:19 PM.
10-27-2015 | 04:19 AM
#25
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 3
From: Lowest Pay I Could Find
Is the term "modification" synonymous with concession? I would like "modifications" to multiple sections of the contract that strengthen our PWA.
I'm afraid that if I answer yes to any "modification" questions it will be seen as willingness for concessions. For example I would be agreeable to modifications to JV that puts 75% of flying in the hands of Delta pilots. I am not agreeable to a modification that sacrifices one seat, one mile or one pound of cargo under a JV.
I'm afraid that if I answer yes to any "modification" questions it will be seen as willingness for concessions. For example I would be agreeable to modifications to JV that puts 75% of flying in the hands of Delta pilots. I am not agreeable to a modification that sacrifices one seat, one mile or one pound of cargo under a JV.
10-27-2015 | 04:29 AM
#26
Straight QOL, homie
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
The new admin is using the same third party survey guy the appeasers used.
That's a problem. It's easy to write a survey to get the answers you want (or you think your client wants).
That's a problem. It's easy to write a survey to get the answers you want (or you think your client wants).
10-27-2015 | 05:12 AM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 6,536
Likes: 281
From: Sitting SC at the Five Towns
10-27-2015 | 05:55 AM
#28
Runs with scissors
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
What are you talking about? I had to log in with both my ALPA number and my password.
On the slanting of the questions, I spent a lot of time explaining my answers in the comments boxes after many of the questions. My bottom line was NO MORE CONCESSIONS and RESTORE US TO PRE-BANKRUPTCY PAY/RETIEMENT BENEFITS!
The company just made $2 Billion in the past 90 days, which is TWICE the 3 year combined vale of the failed TA.
The time for restoration is NOW!
On the slanting of the questions, I spent a lot of time explaining my answers in the comments boxes after many of the questions. My bottom line was NO MORE CONCESSIONS and RESTORE US TO PRE-BANKRUPTCY PAY/RETIEMENT BENEFITS!
The company just made $2 Billion in the past 90 days, which is TWICE the 3 year combined vale of the failed TA.
The time for restoration is NOW!
10-27-2015 | 06:28 AM
#29
The Brown Dot +1
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
What are you talking about? I had to log in with both my ALPA number and my password.
On the slanting of the questions, I spent a lot of time explaining my answers in the comments boxes after many of the questions. My bottom line was NO MORE CONCESSIONS and RESTORE US TO PRE-BANKRUPTCY PAY/RETIEMENT BENEFITS!
The company just made $2 Billion in the past 90 days, which is TWICE the 3 year combined vale of the failed TA.
The time for restoration is NOW!
On the slanting of the questions, I spent a lot of time explaining my answers in the comments boxes after many of the questions. My bottom line was NO MORE CONCESSIONS and RESTORE US TO PRE-BANKRUPTCY PAY/RETIEMENT BENEFITS!
The company just made $2 Billion in the past 90 days, which is TWICE the 3 year combined vale of the failed TA.
The time for restoration is NOW!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
