Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
New Contract Opener 22 Dec 15 >

New Contract Opener 22 Dec 15

Search

Notices

New Contract Opener 22 Dec 15

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-28-2015 | 03:43 PM
  #131  
Elliot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 0
From: "Prof" button manipulator
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
What bothers me most about our last counter proposal was the lack of restoring our DB value. 18% DC won't begin to be enough for the Dead Zone to replace the value of the DB plan that part of our deferred compensation, but was taken from us.
Originally Posted by Commando
If you want a DB plan then you should have gone to FDX or UPS.
Reply
Old 12-28-2015 | 03:43 PM
  #132  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BobZ
Would it help?..... not if the airline revisits bankruptcy.

But as a going concern.... absolutely.

Tim is looking for tangible return on the surrendered DB. Its not likely to happen..... but the LEAST the CBA responsible for constructing and perpetuating such a failed economic model should be required to do..... is at least attempt to prevent any further losses for the membership that has paid so dearly for alpas galactic incompetence.
Apparently not enough people asked for this item as it didn't make it on the list. I'm not sure exactly how we would calculate the "loss." My own math counts both Claim and Note monies and the PBGC $; some would not. Last I checked the single employer PBGC is about 75% funded and that is what I use. Backstopping the future PBGC payments would be the "right thing to do," but I'm not holding my breath. OFG
Reply
Old 12-28-2015 | 06:07 PM
  #133  
Big E 757's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,605
Likes: 12
From: A320 Left seat
Default

Originally Posted by OldFlyGuy
Apparently not enough people asked for this item as it didn't make it on the list. I'm not sure exactly how we would calculate the "loss." My own math counts both Claim and Note monies and the PBGC $; some would not. Last I checked the single employer PBGC is about 75% funded and that is what I use. Backstopping the future PBGC payments would be the "right thing to do," but I'm not holding my breath. OFG

Couldn't Delta just take out an insurance policy in the event of a PBGC failure? Kind of like the golf outings that offer a car if you make a hole in one on a par 3? They don't buy the car, they buy an insurance policy! Just in case someone actually drains one. I'm sure we could find an insurance company to underwrite it. Determine the risk, and estimate how much money it would take to cover what we have coming from the PBGC.

Personally, I'm not counting on the money being there when I retire, but it sure would be nice to believe it's going to be there.
Reply
Old 12-28-2015 | 06:30 PM
  #134  
Purple Drank's Avatar
Straight QOL, homie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Default

Originally Posted by Commando
If you want a DB plan then you should have gone to FDX or UPS.
backside of the clock flying --> shorter life span --> DB pays out for a shorter time.
Reply
Old 12-28-2015 | 07:49 PM
  #135  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 1
Default

OFG.......The criminal shame of it all is for $50M/year and a CBA called THE AIRLINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION....... filled with financial and legal experts......NO ONE SHOULD HAVE TO BE ASKING FOR THIS ON A CONTRACT SURVEY.

This is a national issue. The signatory party to alpa pilots working agreements is ALPA.......That is where the gatekeeper resides for this issue.

ANY airline that used bankptcy to relegate an alpa pilot groups pension to the insolvent pbgc should be held accountable in backstopping that benefit payment.

We are not talking about defunct, fragmented carriers..... we are talking about viable multi-billion profitable corporations that USED bankruptcy for arguably the EXPRESS PURPOSE of shedding pension obligations...

If alpa refuses to ratify a Ta without this provison....it can get dun.
Reply
Old 12-29-2015 | 03:27 AM
  #136  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,816
Likes: 5
From: retired 767(dl)
Default

Originally Posted by Commando
If you want a DB plan then you should have gone to FDX or UPS.
Of course.. Why didn't I think of that?.... Oh! Now I remember, neither aviation departments existed then... Sheeesh...
Reply
Old 12-29-2015 | 05:21 AM
  #137  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by badflaps
Of course.. Why didn't I think of that?.... Oh! Now I remember, neither aviation departments existed then... Sheeesh...
Not to mention Timbo was here for 2 decades or more before the pension was cancelled.
Reply
Old 12-29-2015 | 06:49 AM
  #138  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BobZ
OFG.......The criminal shame of it all is for $50M/year and a CBA called THE AIRLINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION....... filled with financial and legal experts......NO ONE SHOULD HAVE TO BE ASKING FOR THIS ON A CONTRACT SURVEY.

This is a national issue. The signatory party to alpa pilots working agreements is ALPA.......That is where the gatekeeper resides for this issue.

ANY airline that used bankptcy to relegate an alpa pilot groups pension to the insolvent pbgc should be held accountable in backstopping that benefit payment.

We are not talking about defunct, fragmented carriers..... we are talking about viable multi-billion profitable corporations that USED bankruptcy for arguably the EXPRESS PURPOSE of shedding pension obligations...

If alpa refuses to ratify a Ta without this provison....it can get dun.
Well Z, When they canned the DB DL made the case they couldn't restructure AND maintain the DB plan and PBGC bought it. Doing the "right thing" now and "what's legally required" now might be quite different. I don't know how successful anyone has been at post-termination efforts, but obviously DL can afford a fix.. I just doubt they will. I think we are truly in a weird position. Plan terminated and a few years later the company is minting money. Hmm. We should at least ask. OFG
Reply
Old 12-29-2015 | 07:22 AM
  #139  
Quality of Lifer
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 691
Likes: 5
From: M88A
Default

Originally Posted by BobZ
OFG.......The criminal shame of it all is for $50M/year and a CBA called THE AIRLINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION....... filled with financial and legal experts......NO ONE SHOULD HAVE TO BE ASKING FOR THIS ON A CONTRACT SURVEY.

This is a national issue. The signatory party to alpa pilots working agreements is ALPA.......That is where the gatekeeper resides for this issue.

ANY airline that used bankptcy to relegate an alpa pilot groups pension to the insolvent pbgc should be held accountable in backstopping that benefit payment.

We are not talking about defunct, fragmented carriers..... we are talking about viable multi-billion profitable corporations that USED bankruptcy for arguably the EXPRESS PURPOSE of shedding pension obligations...

If alpa refuses to ratify a Ta without this provison....it can get dun.
we should be listening to this guy....he speaketh with straight tongue....
Reply
Old 12-29-2015 | 07:46 AM
  #140  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 1
Default

OFG because of thru criminally incompetent manner in which alpa had structured our DB plan..... with nearly half the benefit streaming from current year operating revenues..... just like fuel and leases..... it was an argument any 5 year old could have made to the court and prevailed.

That is why.... the morning after the bk filing..... the very first operating expense the corporation asked the court to terminate..... was the payment of the unqualified portion of the pension plan.

And the retired guys got zeroed out immediately.

What I am advocating is an effort to prevent history from repeating itself..... again.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
maddogpyrat
FedEx
18
10-07-2015 02:29 PM
Botas
Major
39
06-01-2014 01:17 PM
Mitch Rapp05
United
49
11-22-2013 07:13 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices