Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Captain Dickson's Promise (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/95671-captain-dicksons-promise.html)

OldFlyGuy 06-25-2016 07:01 AM


Originally Posted by Dat jet (Post 2150572)
I don't have a problem necessarily with Delta having JVs/codeshares because it does have its advantages, but IT DOES bother me we do it so much. While UAL and AA have three times to four times as many 777s as we do...and are taking deliveries of 777-300s right now (which we don't even have on order) and they both have 787s on property. They'll get more and more of those type of aircraft while we fly around 767-300/300ERs.....and where is the replacement for these 72 aircraft? Don't say it's the new A350/A330 NEO order...that's only 50 aircraft. Between the 767 fleet and the 747 fleet....that's 88 aircraft. 72 + 16 = 88. And don't forget we have a whopping 18 777s

If we would have given the company the widebody scope metrics they wanted, we would never even see a true 767 replacement. Don't give up scope fellas for a few extra bucks or some other nonsense. You could spend a lot of time at Delta in an A321/737-900ER/C-Series while looking UP at United and AA's 777-300s, 787s, and A350s.

DL is indeed expanding its wide body inventory. Just not at DL. As long as AF, KLM, Korean, China Eastern, Aero Mexico, Virgin Atlantic have 747, 380, 787.. why does DL need them? They claim they do well making smaller piecemeal orders "opportunistic" they call it. I call it kicking the capital expenditure can down the road to fund stock buybacks that weaken us financially. Crap, we have a number of leased 737-900s... those are supposed to be the backbone of our fleet forever and I can't be convinced of a reason to lease any of them. We have 76ERs that are antiques. If we don't have replacements on the order book now we may wait years. I suspect management looks at our JVs as an international scab/replacement force. I trust our management to make money and take care of whomever is left flying for Delta. I'm just not sure what or how many jobs there will be. I'm also not sure how it affects hiring. If the typical UAL, AMR person can expect to spend twice the time on a wide body as a DL person.... That is a ton of career bucks difference. Rant over. Have a great Delta day. JMO, OFG

JamesBond 06-25-2016 07:13 AM


Originally Posted by Dat jet (Post 2150572)
I don't have a problem necessarily with Delta having JVs/codeshares because it does have its advantages, but IT DOES bother me we do it so much. While UAL and AA have three times to four times as many 777s as we do...and are taking deliveries of 777-300s right now (which we don't even have on order) and they both have 787s on property. They'll get more and more of those type of aircraft while we fly around 767-300/300ERs.....and where is the replacement for these 72 aircraft? Don't say it's the new A350/A330 NEO order...that's only 50 aircraft. Between the 767 fleet and the 747 fleet....that's 88 aircraft. 72 + 16 = 88. And don't forget we have a whopping 18 777s

If we would have given the company the widebody scope metrics they wanted in the failed TA, we would never even see a true 767 replacement. Don't give up scope fellas for a few extra bucks or some other nonsense. You could spend a lot of time at Delta in an A321/737-900ER/C-Series while looking UP at United and AA's 777-300s, 787s, and A350s. Sure, we could get a nice pay raise, but in essence a pilot at UAL or AA on average could make more than we do even though they have overall lower pay rate just because they have so much heavy metal...and we have so little to spread around for our folks to fly.

Interesting point. Super premium always has to pay more though. There is no other way.

Dat jet 06-25-2016 07:32 AM


Originally Posted by OldFlyGuy (Post 2150582)
DL is indeed expanding its wide body inventory. Just not at DL. As long as AF, KLM, Korean, China Eastern, Aero Mexico, Virgin Atlantic have 747, 380, 787.. why does DL need them? They claim they do well making smaller piecemeal orders "opportunistic" they call it. I call it kicking the capital expenditure can down the road to fund stock buybacks that weaken us financially. Crap, we have a number of leased 737-900s... those are supposed to be the backbone of our fleet forever and I can't be convinced of a reason to lease any of them. We have 76ERs that are antiques. If we don't have replacements on the order book now we may wait years. I suspect management looks at our JVs as an international scab/replacement force. I trust our management to make money and take care of whomever is left flying for Delta. I'm just not sure what or how many jobs there will be. I'm also not sure how it affects hiring. If the typical UAL, AMR person can expect to spend twice the time on a wide body as a DL person.... That is a ton of career bucks difference. Rant over. Have a great Delta day. JMO, OFG


OldFlyGuy,

That's my point....the widebodies aren't at Delta. I don't think we should buy 40 777s just to have them, but it becomes a problem when the disparity between our widebody fleet and UAL and AMR's widebody fleet continues to grow...to our disadvantage.

Molon Labe 06-25-2016 11:10 AM


Originally Posted by sidestep (Post 2150545)
Too bad she didn't take the job, she might be half way up the seniority list by now..:eek:

NAAAAH! she likes dogs not cats! Besides she worked for two and a half years and really quit when she married a Captain...And stayed married to him.

OldFlyGuy 06-25-2016 11:20 AM


Originally Posted by Dat jet (Post 2150609)
OldFlyGuy,

That's my point....the widebodies aren't at Delta. I don't think we should buy 40 777s just to have them, but it becomes a problem when the disparity between our widebody fleet and UAL and AMR's widebody fleet continues to grow...to our disadvantage.

I simply agree. I've always felt eventually if we have less "metal" commitment to a JV we will be marginalized. Eventually the JV partners recognize that they have more capital risk at stake and could shift alliances. DL mgmt has addressed this by buying the JV partners. IMO we are looking at a classic "whipsaw" situation down the road. My career is almost done. This is about the future. There is a saying you "dance with the one what brung you" and I don't believe DL is living up to that commitment. If we can't come to an agreement I believe DL will simply propose to dump all scope limits (after all you can't disrupt commerce) and we will be in the same place as EAL vs Lorenzo. I hope I'm wrong. RLA and politics aren't on our side. JMO, OFG

capncrunch 06-25-2016 09:07 PM


Originally Posted by JamesBond (Post 2150594)
Interesting point. Super premium always has to pay more though. There is no other way.

...or the coup of getting the 777 lined up with the 747 and the 330 lined up with the 767. Whoops now we screwed ourselves going for a land grab. Management must have loved watching one side drop bigger aircraft into lower paying categories.

Molon Labe 06-25-2016 09:12 PM


Originally Posted by capncrunch (Post 2150980)
...or the coup of getting the 777 lined up with the 747 and the 330 lined up with the 767. Whoops now we screwed ourselves going for a land grab. Management must have loved that one.

Boy did you hit the nail on the head there.....Moak reminds me of that guy from ANIMAL HOUSE...what was his name? Niedermayer...and his fraternity full of Niedermayer clones, hence the payscales and the like,,,,yes management is very much like Dean Wormer, and hence likes them a lot!!!!

finis72 06-26-2016 01:12 AM


Originally Posted by capncrunch (Post 2150980)
...or the coup of getting the 777 lined up with the 747 and the 330 lined up with the 767. Whoops now we screwed ourselves going for a land grab. Management must have loved watching one side drop bigger aircraft into lower paying categories.

You are absolutely right, why did we bring the 747 rate UP to the (DL) 777 rate. 😎

JamesBond 06-26-2016 03:09 AM


Originally Posted by OldFlyGuy (Post 2150582)
DL is indeed expanding its wide body inventory. Just not at DL. As long as AF, KLM, Korean, China Eastern, Aero Mexico, Virgin Atlantic have 747, 380, 787.. why does DL need them? They claim they do well making smaller piecemeal orders "opportunistic" they call it. I call it kicking the capital expenditure can down the road to fund stock buybacks that weaken us financially. Crap, we have a number of leased 737-900s... those are supposed to be the backbone of our fleet forever and I can't be convinced of a reason to lease any of them. We have 76ERs that are antiques. If we don't have replacements on the order book now we may wait years. I suspect management looks at our JVs as an international scab/replacement force. I trust our management to make money and take care of whomever is left flying for Delta. I'm just not sure what or how many jobs there will be. I'm also not sure how it affects hiring. If the typical UAL, AMR person can expect to spend twice the time on a wide body as a DL person.... That is a ton of career bucks difference. Rant over. Have a great Delta day. JMO, OFG


Originally Posted by capncrunch (Post 2150980)
...or the coup of getting the 777 lined up with the 747 and the 330 lined up with the 767. Whoops now we screwed ourselves going for a land grab. Management must have loved watching one side drop bigger aircraft into lower paying categories.

revise history much?

Purple Drank 06-26-2016 03:52 AM


Originally Posted by TED74 (Post 2150544)
Exactly what our management is hoping for...hold us back to taking a small step and prevent us from hitting the home run that is clearly deserved and achievable.

Look at Zoomi's post history. He's a hard-core management sympathizer.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:54 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands