![]() |
Mantooth and ERflier
What is an acceptable hourly pay increase? 18/4/4? Where are you guys at?
What is acceptable for a vacation day? We are at 3:15 and FedEx is 6 hours. Dickson promised industry leading work rules, not Tom Brielmann. Should we make scope JV concessions like moving to block hours and bringing management immediately in compliance? Should we allow more 76 seat jets at DCI and increase their MTGW? |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 2177993)
What is an acceptable hourly pay increase? 18/4/4? Where are you guys at?
What is acceptable for a vacation day? We are at 3:15 and FedEx is 6 hours. Dickson promised industry leading work rules, not Tom Brielmann. Should we make scope JV concessions like moving to block hours and bringing management immediately in compliance? Should we allow more 76 seat jets at DCI and increase their MTGW? |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 2177993)
What is an acceptable hourly pay increase? 18/4/4? Where are you guys at?
What is acceptable for a vacation day? We are at 3:15 and FedEx is 6 hours. Dickson promised industry leading work rules, not Tom Brielmann. Should we make scope JV concessions like moving to block hours and bringing management immediately in compliance? Should we allow more 76 seat jets at DCI and increase their MTGW? |
I'm not going to cherry-pick. I'll leave it up to the NC to get as much as they can. They're not perfect but they seem to be getting much more.
Ironically I was beginning think the last rejection of TA 1 was a good idea. I mean if we get $800M (it's already $600/year more) more per year than our current contract that's more than double from last time. However, there is a point of diminishing returns. At what point does a complete stalemate lead to $0? That's the trick. To get something sooner rather than 1-2% more in four years. If they get nothing then voting No to C2015 was the dumbest thing we ever did and was all for nothing. We could have had more in C2015 and C2018 vice a fat goose egg. A deal can be had. Heads just have to knocked together and the MEC needs to get some courage. They should just all be like Cincinnatus. Serve the pilots, and then go back to line and fly having done their duty. Don't worry about another term. Do their damn jobs. |
Originally Posted by ERflyer
(Post 2178005)
Ironically I was beginning think the last rejection of TA 1 was a good idea. I mean if we get $800M (it's already $600/year more) more per year than our current contract that's more than double from last time.
With management exclusions on PS and exclusion of DC on PS, you could see a NEGATIVE value over current compensation rates. It is FALSE. Period. There is no limit on those exclusions, so they can make any new contract a loss. What is frustrating you is social media has allowed pilots to expose your lies and deceit. |
Originally Posted by 404yxl
(Post 2178014)
Every time you state it comes with more money is a lie.
With management exclusions on PS and exclusion of DC on PS, you could see a NEGATIVE value over current compensation rates. It is FALSE. Period. There is no limit on those exclusions, so they can make any new contract a loss. What is frustrating you is social media has allowed pilots to expose your lies and deceit. From Negotiators Notepad 16-08, July 21: "Even under the Company’s unacceptable pay proposal, our net gain in value is already some $600M per year ahead of the PWA." Go to http://dal.alpa.org/ for the document. Using your logic one could say there's no limit to our profit sharing either. We could all be gazillionaires. |
Originally Posted by 404yxl
(Post 2178014)
Every time you state it comes with more money is a lie.
With management exclusions on PS and exclusion of DC on PS, you could see a NEGATIVE value over current compensation rates. It is FALSE. Period. There is no limit on those exclusions, so they can make any new contract a loss. What is frustrating you is social media has allowed pilots to expose your lies and deceit. https://lh6.ggpht.com/0GIdzgyzaUEAS_...l74yxq7xw=w300 "Squawk, time value of money. Squawk, 600m in gains, squawk". |
Originally Posted by ERflyer
(Post 2178021)
Im quoting your NC.
From Negotiators Notepad 16-08, July 21: "Even under the Company’s unacceptable pay proposal, our net gain in value is already some $600M per year ahead of the PWA." Go to http://dal.alpa.org/ for the document. Using your logic one could say there's no limit to our profit sharing either. We could all be gazillionaires. You only care about pay rates. Who exactly is your audience? |
Originally Posted by iceman49
(Post 2178002)
Gerry, where are you going with this?
|
Originally Posted by 404yxl
(Post 2178014)
There is no limit on those exclusions, so they can make any new contract a loss.
What is frustrating you is social media has allowed pilots to expose your lies and deceit. It is clearly defined in the Annexes to the 10-K. I'm not saying it can't reach a high value, but it is defined and limited. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:06 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands