Mantooth and ERflier
#1
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
What is an acceptable hourly pay increase? 18/4/4? Where are you guys at?
What is acceptable for a vacation day? We are at 3:15 and FedEx is 6 hours. Dickson promised industry leading work rules, not Tom Brielmann.
Should we make scope JV concessions like moving to block hours and bringing management immediately in compliance?
Should we allow more 76 seat jets at DCI and increase their MTGW?
What is acceptable for a vacation day? We are at 3:15 and FedEx is 6 hours. Dickson promised industry leading work rules, not Tom Brielmann.
Should we make scope JV concessions like moving to block hours and bringing management immediately in compliance?
Should we allow more 76 seat jets at DCI and increase their MTGW?
#2
What is an acceptable hourly pay increase? 18/4/4? Where are you guys at?
What is acceptable for a vacation day? We are at 3:15 and FedEx is 6 hours. Dickson promised industry leading work rules, not Tom Brielmann.
Should we make scope JV concessions like moving to block hours and bringing management immediately in compliance?
Should we allow more 76 seat jets at DCI and increase their MTGW?
What is acceptable for a vacation day? We are at 3:15 and FedEx is 6 hours. Dickson promised industry leading work rules, not Tom Brielmann.
Should we make scope JV concessions like moving to block hours and bringing management immediately in compliance?
Should we allow more 76 seat jets at DCI and increase their MTGW?
#3
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Likes: 0
What is an acceptable hourly pay increase? 18/4/4? Where are you guys at?
What is acceptable for a vacation day? We are at 3:15 and FedEx is 6 hours. Dickson promised industry leading work rules, not Tom Brielmann.
Should we make scope JV concessions like moving to block hours and bringing management immediately in compliance?
Should we allow more 76 seat jets at DCI and increase their MTGW?
What is acceptable for a vacation day? We are at 3:15 and FedEx is 6 hours. Dickson promised industry leading work rules, not Tom Brielmann.
Should we make scope JV concessions like moving to block hours and bringing management immediately in compliance?
Should we allow more 76 seat jets at DCI and increase their MTGW?
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,418
Likes: 0
I'm not going to cherry-pick. I'll leave it up to the NC to get as much as they can. They're not perfect but they seem to be getting much more.
Ironically I was beginning think the last rejection of TA 1 was a good idea. I mean if we get $800M (it's already $600/year more) more per year than our current contract that's more than double from last time.
However, there is a point of diminishing returns. At what point does a complete stalemate lead to $0? That's the trick. To get something sooner rather than 1-2% more in four years. If they get nothing then voting No to C2015 was the dumbest thing we ever did and was all for nothing. We could have had more in C2015 and C2018 vice a fat goose egg.
A deal can be had. Heads just have to knocked together and the MEC needs to get some courage. They should just all be like Cincinnatus. Serve the pilots, and then go back to line and fly having done their duty.
Don't worry about another term. Do their damn jobs.
Ironically I was beginning think the last rejection of TA 1 was a good idea. I mean if we get $800M (it's already $600/year more) more per year than our current contract that's more than double from last time.
However, there is a point of diminishing returns. At what point does a complete stalemate lead to $0? That's the trick. To get something sooner rather than 1-2% more in four years. If they get nothing then voting No to C2015 was the dumbest thing we ever did and was all for nothing. We could have had more in C2015 and C2018 vice a fat goose egg.
A deal can be had. Heads just have to knocked together and the MEC needs to get some courage. They should just all be like Cincinnatus. Serve the pilots, and then go back to line and fly having done their duty.
Don't worry about another term. Do their damn jobs.
#5
Banned
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
With management exclusions on PS and exclusion of DC on PS, you could see a NEGATIVE value over current compensation rates.
It is FALSE. Period.
There is no limit on those exclusions, so they can make any new contract a loss.
What is frustrating you is social media has allowed pilots to expose your lies and deceit.
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,418
Likes: 0
Every time you state it comes with more money is a lie.
With management exclusions on PS and exclusion of DC on PS, you could see a NEGATIVE value over current compensation rates.
It is FALSE. Period.
There is no limit on those exclusions, so they can make any new contract a loss.
What is frustrating you is social media has allowed pilots to expose your lies and deceit.
With management exclusions on PS and exclusion of DC on PS, you could see a NEGATIVE value over current compensation rates.
It is FALSE. Period.
There is no limit on those exclusions, so they can make any new contract a loss.
What is frustrating you is social media has allowed pilots to expose your lies and deceit.
From Negotiators Notepad 16-08, July 21:
"Even under the Company’s unacceptable pay proposal, our net gain in value is already some $600M per year ahead of the PWA."
Go to http://dal.alpa.org/ for the document.
Using your logic one could say there's no limit to our profit sharing either. We could all be gazillionaires.
#7
Every time you state it comes with more money is a lie.
With management exclusions on PS and exclusion of DC on PS, you could see a NEGATIVE value over current compensation rates.
It is FALSE. Period.
There is no limit on those exclusions, so they can make any new contract a loss.
What is frustrating you is social media has allowed pilots to expose your lies and deceit.
With management exclusions on PS and exclusion of DC on PS, you could see a NEGATIVE value over current compensation rates.
It is FALSE. Period.
There is no limit on those exclusions, so they can make any new contract a loss.
What is frustrating you is social media has allowed pilots to expose your lies and deceit.
"Squawk, time value of money. Squawk, 600m in gains, squawk".
#8
Straight QOL, homie
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Im quoting your NC.
From Negotiators Notepad 16-08, July 21:
"Even under the Company’s unacceptable pay proposal, our net gain in value is already some $600M per year ahead of the PWA."
Go to http://dal.alpa.org/ for the document.
Using your logic one could say there's no limit to our profit sharing either. We could all be gazillionaires.
From Negotiators Notepad 16-08, July 21:
"Even under the Company’s unacceptable pay proposal, our net gain in value is already some $600M per year ahead of the PWA."
Go to http://dal.alpa.org/ for the document.
Using your logic one could say there's no limit to our profit sharing either. We could all be gazillionaires.
You only care about pay rates. Who exactly is your audience?
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
It is clearly defined in the Annexes to the 10-K. I'm not saying it can't reach a high value, but it is defined and limited.


