Search

Notices

Mantooth and ERflier

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-10-2016 | 02:50 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default Mantooth and ERflier

What is an acceptable hourly pay increase? 18/4/4? Where are you guys at?

What is acceptable for a vacation day? We are at 3:15 and FedEx is 6 hours. Dickson promised industry leading work rules, not Tom Brielmann.

Should we make scope JV concessions like moving to block hours and bringing management immediately in compliance?

Should we allow more 76 seat jets at DCI and increase their MTGW?
Reply
Old 08-10-2016 | 02:53 PM
  #2  
Elmer Fudd's Avatar
GAME ON!!!!
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
What is an acceptable hourly pay increase? 18/4/4? Where are you guys at?

What is acceptable for a vacation day? We are at 3:15 and FedEx is 6 hours. Dickson promised industry leading work rules, not Tom Brielmann.

Should we make scope JV concessions like moving to block hours and bringing management immediately in compliance?

Should we allow more 76 seat jets at DCI and increase their MTGW?
If you believe anything SD says, I have some really great swamp land in central Nevada that you have to see!!!!!
Reply
Old 08-10-2016 | 03:01 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
What is an acceptable hourly pay increase? 18/4/4? Where are you guys at?

What is acceptable for a vacation day? We are at 3:15 and FedEx is 6 hours. Dickson promised industry leading work rules, not Tom Brielmann.

Should we make scope JV concessions like moving to block hours and bringing management immediately in compliance?

Should we allow more 76 seat jets at DCI and increase their MTGW?
Gerry, where are you going with this?
Reply
Old 08-10-2016 | 03:05 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,418
Likes: 0
Default

I'm not going to cherry-pick. I'll leave it up to the NC to get as much as they can. They're not perfect but they seem to be getting much more.

Ironically I was beginning think the last rejection of TA 1 was a good idea. I mean if we get $800M (it's already $600/year more) more per year than our current contract that's more than double from last time.

However, there is a point of diminishing returns. At what point does a complete stalemate lead to $0? That's the trick. To get something sooner rather than 1-2% more in four years. If they get nothing then voting No to C2015 was the dumbest thing we ever did and was all for nothing. We could have had more in C2015 and C2018 vice a fat goose egg.

A deal can be had. Heads just have to knocked together and the MEC needs to get some courage. They should just all be like Cincinnatus. Serve the pilots, and then go back to line and fly having done their duty.

Don't worry about another term. Do their damn jobs.
Reply
Old 08-10-2016 | 03:18 PM
  #5  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ERflyer
Ironically I was beginning think the last rejection of TA 1 was a good idea. I mean if we get $800M (it's already $600/year more) more per year than our current contract that's more than double from last time.
Every time you state it comes with more money is a lie.

With management exclusions on PS and exclusion of DC on PS, you could see a NEGATIVE value over current compensation rates.

It is FALSE. Period.

There is no limit on those exclusions, so they can make any new contract a loss.

What is frustrating you is social media has allowed pilots to expose your lies and deceit.
Reply
Old 08-10-2016 | 03:29 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,418
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 404yxl
Every time you state it comes with more money is a lie.

With management exclusions on PS and exclusion of DC on PS, you could see a NEGATIVE value over current compensation rates.

It is FALSE. Period.

There is no limit on those exclusions, so they can make any new contract a loss.

What is frustrating you is social media has allowed pilots to expose your lies and deceit.
Im quoting your NC.

From Negotiators Notepad 16-08, July 21:

"Even under the Company’s unacceptable pay proposal, our net gain in value is already some $600M per year ahead of the PWA."

Go to http://dal.alpa.org/ for the document.

Using your logic one could say there's no limit to our profit sharing either. We could all be gazillionaires.
Reply
Old 08-10-2016 | 03:31 PM
  #7  
capncrunch's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 16
Default

Originally Posted by 404yxl
Every time you state it comes with more money is a lie.

With management exclusions on PS and exclusion of DC on PS, you could see a NEGATIVE value over current compensation rates.

It is FALSE. Period.

There is no limit on those exclusions, so they can make any new contract a loss.

What is frustrating you is social media has allowed pilots to expose your lies and deceit.
That guy will talk you in circles. No matter how many times you explain concessions, he ignores that and repeats whatever magic number ALPA spits out. You'll just end up blue in the face. He's a repeating parrot.



"Squawk, time value of money. Squawk, 600m in gains, squawk".
Reply
Old 08-10-2016 | 04:10 PM
  #8  
Purple Drank's Avatar
Straight QOL, homie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Default

Originally Posted by ERflyer
Im quoting your NC.

From Negotiators Notepad 16-08, July 21:

"Even under the Company’s unacceptable pay proposal, our net gain in value is already some $600M per year ahead of the PWA."

Go to http://dal.alpa.org/ for the document.

Using your logic one could say there's no limit to our profit sharing either. We could all be gazillionaires.
Their costing is suspect.
You only care about pay rates. Who exactly is your audience?
Reply
Old 08-10-2016 | 06:07 PM
  #9  
JamesBond's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 7,292
Likes: 0
From: A350 Both
Default

Originally Posted by iceman49
Gerry, where are you going with this?
Division. Like he always does.
Reply
Old 08-10-2016 | 06:36 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 404yxl
There is no limit on those exclusions, so they can make any new contract a loss.

What is frustrating you is social media has allowed pilots to expose your lies and deceit.
404, I asked in a different thread for you to explain this from a similar post you wrote. Now I know what you mean. I think you are wrong. Management Incentive Plan, and Equity Compensation is not a floating, undefined value to be changed at management will.

It is clearly defined in the Annexes to the 10-K. I'm not saying it can't reach a high value, but it is defined and limited.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices