![]() |
Originally Posted by Imapilot2
(Post 2192445)
I must be the only one who thinks we will not vote on a TA until late next Spring.
|
Originally Posted by Imapilot2
(Post 2192445)
I must be the only one who thinks we will not vote on a TA until late next Spring.
Wind the watch and wait. 800 retirements around the corner and the other carriers are there now. |
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 2192448)
If Jerry has his way, it will be spring of 2020.
Management needs our concessions. And the surrender monkeys are out in force. |
Furthermore, I am pretty sure our merger TA and C12 did not lead AAL's pre-BK contract, scope, A-fund, B-fund, number of wide bodies, etc. How did that contract look compared to SWA? Fedex? UPS?
Merger: Continuation of the Alaska debacle that set back our LAX plans at least a decade (2008 to 2016-2018 for the new terminals). Combination of both regional programs into the monster DCI became before they couldn't staff it C12: ALV+15 for reserves Significant increase in 76-seat jets at DCI Reduction in PS And thanks to side letters, drastic reduction in the floor of Pacific flying Other than payrates at CAL and UAL, how exactly did we lead? How come our fresh captains are up in NYC and at UAL they are f-CAL 737 captains at LAX? I strongly disagree that we led... Maybe in some small areas, but not areas that last one's career. |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 2192474)
IMO this will be done in September.
Management needs our concessions. And the surrender monkeys are out in force. |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 2192474)
IMO this will be done in September.
Management needs our concessions. And the surrender monkeys are out in force. If "the 12" hijacked the MEC Special Meeting and were directing demands and positions that Buzz and Sam felt would ice us for months, how are we able to sit back down at the dinner table with the company and the NMB? It is truly "bizzaro world" when Buzz is saying the 12 were unrealistically demanding too much but Jerry is saying the 12 are "surrender monkeys." I really need a bigger bucket of popcorn for this show... |
Originally Posted by FL370esq
(Post 2192587)
I guess I'm more confused than an Amish electrician. I thought "the 12" took over the MEC Special meeting by caucus in order to direct the NC to carry forward outrageous demands for the Aug 26th NMB-directed meeting after our "time out." Or so it seemed after reading Buzz's rather hypocritical letter to his Council. Based on Buzz's and Sam's letters, I would have inferred "the 12" were aligned more closely with Jerry's perspective than Buzz's but yet this post appears. To quote James Bond...Dubya-Tee-Eff?
If "the 12" hijacked the MEC Special Meeting and were directing demands and positions that Buzz and Sam felt would ice us for months, how are we able to sit back down at the dinner table with the company and the NMB? It is truly "bizzaro world" when Buzz is saying the 12 were unrealistically demanding too much but Jerry is saying the 12 are "surrender monkeys." I really need a bigger bucket of popcorn for this show... |
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 2192629)
The difference is that Jerry wants the MEC to fail.
|
Originally Posted by Moondog
(Post 2192669)
I do not believe that is correct. It appears that he does not want them to sell us out, like your bunch tried to last year, but fail, no.
|
Could somebody please post where SD said that every single part of the contract would be industry leading. I would love to see this. I wish it were true. I think what he said was that we would have it industry-leading contract, not that every section of the contract would be industry-leading. Maybe I'm getting lost in semantics.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:55 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands