A321 pay rate
09-07-2016 | 03:24 AM
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,362
Likes: 58
^^^totally agree^^^
The rate of pay for different airframes makes absolutely no sense. Seriously needs correcting.
747 = A350
777 = A330
737 = A320
ALL DC-9 variants (MD-88/717/MD-90) should be same rate, and probably at the A320/737 scale. Gotta' be a story here as to how messed up our pay system became.
The rate of pay for different airframes makes absolutely no sense. Seriously needs correcting.
747 = A350
777 = A330
737 = A320
ALL DC-9 variants (MD-88/717/MD-90) should be same rate, and probably at the A320/737 scale. Gotta' be a story here as to how messed up our pay system became.
Of course, enacting paybanding would be a concession in the eyes of the 10% "absolutely no" crowd because pay banding would likely reduce some training/AE movement...so I guess it will never pass.
09-07-2016 | 03:28 AM
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,362
Likes: 58
Besides the 75/76 banding while the MD88/MD90 paid different rates, there was a short time when our 10 737-700s paid significantly less than the -800 which was interesting. I gave up trying to figure it out 15 years ago. Didn't make sense then, doesn't make sense now. 😊
09-07-2016 | 06:10 AM
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,556
Likes: 11
^^^totally agree^^^
The rate of pay for different airframes makes absolutely no sense. Seriously needs correcting.
747 = A350
777 = A330
737 = A320
ALL DC-9 variants (MD-88/717/MD-90) should be same rate, and probably at the A320/737 scale. Gotta' be a story here as to how messed up our pay system became.
The rate of pay for different airframes makes absolutely no sense. Seriously needs correcting.
747 = A350
777 = A330
737 = A320
ALL DC-9 variants (MD-88/717/MD-90) should be same rate, and probably at the A320/737 scale. Gotta' be a story here as to how messed up our pay system became.
2 aisles: 777
1 aisle: 757
09-09-2016 | 10:47 AM
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 169
From: window seat
There's zero chance it will be our current 737-900 rate unless there's some Cayman/Suisse accounts somewhere getting huge transfers. Even then it would be hard to do.
There's no way an arbitrator will ignore the 15-20% premium our direct peers already get and somehow index the rate to our already lagging horribly expired pay tables.
Look for another "Delta dot" at least indexed to UAL's (etc) current rates with zero concessions.
There's no way an arbitrator will ignore the 15-20% premium our direct peers already get and somehow index the rate to our already lagging horribly expired pay tables.
Look for another "Delta dot" at least indexed to UAL's (etc) current rates with zero concessions.
09-09-2016 | 11:12 AM
#19
Thread Starter
Racketeer
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,242
Likes: 702
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
There's zero chance it will be our current 737-900 rate unless there's some Cayman/Suisse accounts somewhere getting huge transfers. Even then it would be hard to do.
There's no way an arbitrator will ignore the 15-20% premium our direct peers already get and somehow index the rate to our already lagging horribly expired pay tables.
Look for another "Delta dot" at least indexed to UAL's (etc) current rates with zero concessions.
There's no way an arbitrator will ignore the 15-20% premium our direct peers already get and somehow index the rate to our already lagging horribly expired pay tables.
Look for another "Delta dot" at least indexed to UAL's (etc) current rates with zero concessions.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
