![]() |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 2198197)
... and while everyone called that a B scale, it was $20 an hour more than the 2011 Boeing 747 rate brought to the merger. With the effect of profit sharing make it $60 an hour more than the super-premium widebody captain seat which I'll never be able to hold. You lurkers should really let this sink in a minute. This was not in 1970. This was five..... years.... ago....... Realize what guys like Jerry and Purple Drank are doing here. Jerry is all about the failure of dALPA. All about the failure of YOUR union. PD is right there with him. Sign that DPA card, and weaken our stance, our unity and our ability to get a better deal. The company sees this. When they see that you sign a card for alternate bargaining agents, they dig in harder because they see fraction. "We must all hang together or surely we will all hang separately" That phrase was true then and it is true now. DPA is poison. |
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 2198410)
7ERs won't get banded. Too much of a size difference and no precedent set at any of the other Legacies.
Then in subsequent contracts we can get to a rational pay scheme. |
Originally Posted by Schwanker
(Post 2198408)
C2012 had nothing to do with it. The acquisition of mainline aircraft is the reason there are more BH at mainline. C2012 did not put aircraft at the mainline.
C2012 put more 76 seat aircraft at the regionals, breathing life into the regional model. The argument could be made absent this scope concession, we may have seen even greater orders at mainline to provide the lift. Every contract cycle, management incrementally increases there ability to fly more 76 seat aircraft because we are so use to caving. That's all it is, another scope concession. Now they are back at the trough again, whether they need it or not. Why hasn't AA ordered more airframes for mainline instead of increasing regional airframes and reducing mainline? Why the big difference between the two Legacies that have implemented Scope Choke vs the one that doesn't? |
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 2198418)
Ok let's say I agree with your breathing life into the regional model argument(I don't):
Why hasn't AA ordered more airframes for mainline instead of increasing regional airframes and reducing mainline? Why the big difference between the two Legacies that have implemented Scope Choke vs the one that doesn't? I would guess AA is replacing mainline flying with regional flying because their scope allows it. Would you like to relax our scope further to allow Delta to do the same? Why the big difference? Not sure what the difference is, but from what your saying (assuming it's what's happening), I'd say again it's probably because their scope allows it. Again, why would you argue more 76 seaters is good here? |
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 2198415)
$20 an hour more for an RJ than what was obtained at a major carrier.
You lurkers should really let this sink in a minute. This was not in 1970. This was five..... years.... ago....... Realize what guys like Jerry and Purple Drank are doing here. Jerry is all about the failure of dALPA. All about the failure of YOUR union. PD is right there with him. Sign that DPA card, and weaken our stance, our unity and our ability to get a better deal. The company sees this. When they see that you sign a card for alternate bargaining agents, they dig in harder because they see fraction. "We must all hang together or surely we will all hang separately" That phrase was true then and it is true now. DPA is poison.
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 2198417)
That's a mistake. I know it is a process, but this is the time to make that happen. We should set the bar on that one.
Then in subsequent contracts we can get to a rational pay scheme. I would prefer to keep the pay structure of the other Legacies and just band the 330 and 765. I think it's much more attainable and our 330 fleet is growimg rapidly. |
Originally Posted by Schwanker
(Post 2198432)
Your right. The regional industry would thrive on 50 seaters alone!:rolleyes:
I would guess AA is replacing mainline flying with regional flying because their scope allows it. Would you like to relax our scope further to allow Delta to do the same? Why the big difference? Not sure what the difference is, but from what your saying (assuming it's what's happening), I'd say again it's probably because their scope allows it. Again, why would you argue more 76 seaters is good here? Because their Scope ALLOWs them to. Our scope does not. While our scope allows them to add more 76 seaters our Block Hour protections forces them to remove 50 seaters and and add more mainline block hours before EACH additional 76 seater is allowed in service. This language does not exist at AA and you see the results. #ScopeChoke |
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 2198444)
Now we are getting somewhere!
Because their Scope ALLOWs them to. Our scope does not. While our scope allows them to add more 76 seaters our Block Hour protections forces them to remove 50 seaters and and add more mainline block hours before EACH additional 76 seater is allowed in service. This language does not exist at AA and you see the results. #ScopeChoke The company negotiated the ratios knowing their fleet plan. They know we always want more airplanes so they capitalized on their acquisition plans by asking us to relax our scope further. Of course, we obliged because that's just what we do. Are you insinuating the 717s, 737s, and C series are coming because we fooled this management team? Did these acquisitions only make sense with 325 large RJs but weren't economically viable with 255 large RJs? These planes are coming anyways if it makes economic sense. Our scope give is just gravy on the top. This is taking mainline flying and giving it to the regionals. Is there something wrong with Delta pilots flying Delta branded aircraft? |
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 2198435)
Agree 100%. DPA type philosophy will result in the same path the Republican Party on, Path to being obsolete and irrelevant. This is what happens when you continually use emotion, repetitive rhetoric and statements that lack any math, reason, or analytical thinking(SWA Contract=8000 jobs, we'll have a new TA in 48 hours if rejected etc)
IMO getting 7ER banded this contract would be impossible unless we take a Cargo carrier type hit to the top rates like UPS and FedEx which pay their largest jets below UAL top rate. I would prefer to keep the pay structure of the other Legacies and just band the 330 and 765. I think it's much more attainable and our 330 fleet is growimg rapidly. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 2198346)
13500/13500 = 19/19 = 1 voice
11734/13500 ~ 7/12 = unfocused & unable to close a deal You just made us a little further from unity and further from a deal. You aren't putting pressure on ALPA. You are undermining your bargaining agent and adding one of a thousand cuts. If you hate all things Delta, kudos. You just succeeded in a very small way towards of your goal of making this a miserable unrewarding place to spend a career. |
Originally Posted by Schwanker
(Post 2198459)
Then why are you implying scope concessions are good?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:19 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands