Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   SWA solidly passes their TA2 (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/98199-swa-solidly-passes-their-ta2.html)

sailingfun 11-10-2016 03:15 AM


Originally Posted by NoAgenda (Post 2240763)
Respectfully disagree, sir. The debt servicing differential (which is in excess of $15 Billion) plus the older fleet (i.e., not paying high lease or ownership cost for new aircraft) make Delta poised to weather a downturn without parking an equal amount of planes.

Actually as management has stated at roadshows UAL SWA and AMR can't afford to adjust capacity downward fast because of the cost of leases and payments on their newer fleets. Delta on the other hand can very quickly send aircraft to the desert with little to no financial penalty. The 4th floor even calls the 88 fleet the accumulator aircraft.

KnotSoFast 11-10-2016 04:40 AM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 2240934)
Actually as management has stated at roadshows UAL SWA and AMR can't afford to adjust capacity downward fast because of the cost of leases and payments on their newer fleets. Delta on the other hand can very quickly send aircraft to the desert with little to no financial penalty. The 4th floor even calls the 88 fleet the accumulator aircraft.


.
AMR's debt will peak next year at approx $30B. At the same time, DAL's will reach the neighborhood of $5B and stay there. (That's a nice neighborhood). Consider the debt service on $30B that must be paid before any profit is realized. That, coupled with our owning a large portion of our fleet gives us a huge cushion to be flexible during a downturn.
.

Big E 757 11-10-2016 05:50 AM


Originally Posted by NoAgenda (Post 2240763)
Respectfully disagree, sir. The debt servicing differential (which is in excess of $15 Billion) plus the older fleet (i.e., not paying high lease or ownership cost for new aircraft) make Delta poised to weather a downturn without parking an equal amount of planes.

So, what you're saying is that while UAL and AAL park aircraft because of week demand, we will continue to fly our fleet with 55-60% load factor because we have money to burn?

I guess it is impossible to know or argue about this because it will all depend on the severity of the downturn. I agree we will be in a better position financially.

I think we will do everything necessary to limit the bleeding, which will include decreasing service to meet demand, and thus, parking aircraft. I hope we never find out.

Edit: I reread my original post and I said we would park an equal amount of aircraft, which might not be accurate. If we were smart, we could grow into markets abandoned by UAL and AAL to prevent the LCC's from taking advantage of the downturn. Again, I hope we never find out.

Scoop 11-10-2016 06:12 AM


Originally Posted by Big E 757 (Post 2240752)
We may be healthier in a downturn, financially, but if passengers show up in lesser numbers, you can bet we will park as many aircraft as UAL or AAL


True, but it is about more than parking aircraft, its about the long term strength of the company. If there was a huge downturn requiring aircraft to be parked then UAL/AMR could have serious troubling meeting debt obligations - DAL much less so.

Yes it sucks for all of us to have aircraft parked but if people are not flying what choice do we have?

All other things being equal the company with the lower debt burden will be under much less pressure to come up with $$$$ elsewhere in the company - think furloughs and compensation cutbacks.

Yes all the airlines will have a tough time if people stop flying but some airlines will be affected less and recover more quickly.

Scoop

sailingfun 11-10-2016 06:22 AM


Originally Posted by Scoop (Post 2241016)
True, but it is about more than parking aircraft, its about the long term strength of the company. If there was a huge downturn requiring aircraft to be parked then UAL/AMR could have serious troubling meeting debt obligations - DAL much less so.

Yes it sucks for all of us to have aircraft parked but if people are not flying what choice do we have?

All other things being equal the company with the lower debt burden will be under much less pressure to come up with $$$$ elsewhere in the company - think furloughs and compensation cutbacks.

Yes all the airlines will have a tough time if people stop flying but some airlines will be affected less and recover more quickly.

Scoop


Keep up n mind Delta's pension obligations, we carry them off the books. AMR and UAL are refleeting faster then Delta which accounts for a portion of their debt. Delta will have to pay the same piper. We have just delayed it for short term stock gains.

gloopy 11-10-2016 08:49 AM


Originally Posted by FIIGMO (Post 2240896)
Debt

Much better product.

I agree with debt. And when interest rates start climbing above the near zero level, the cost of carrying it will soar. I hope our new fleets aren't being put on the credit card to the same extent as our competition. As for product, we do run a good ship and that's probably the single most important part. But we lag way behind even LCC's on many routes. Forger RNAV, we should take the dogs out of NYC at least every route we compete with JB on.

MWright 11-11-2016 03:40 PM


Originally Posted by flyguy81 (Post 2239935)
I doubt they ever get their work rules on par with the other 3 without taking a huge hit somewhere else.

Which work rules are you referring to?

flyguy81 11-12-2016 09:45 AM


Originally Posted by MWright (Post 2241759)
Which work rules are you referring to?

AA's nonexistent ones.

Hank Kingsley 11-12-2016 03:31 PM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 2241025)
Keep up n mind Delta's pension obligations, we carry them off the books. AMR and UAL are refleeting faster then Delta which accounts for a portion of their debt. Delta will have to pay the same piper. We have just delayed it for short term stock gains.

Do you have a comparison on interest paid on debt? That's big.

notEnuf 11-12-2016 05:55 PM

Q3 interest expense

AAL $250M
DAL $95M
UAL $150M


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:54 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands