Especially when the tie breaker is the person voting for himself. I find that interesting.

JJ voted no to the TA, but his vote was surrounded by uncertainty. CK voted in support of the TA. No sure I see your point?

How can we fight against their recalls? And *** don't we have electronic voting for this stuff?

JM said he was one and done. Running again is a red flag in the integrity column. (I know, I'm naïve.) Today's vote works for me.

Oof, Malone can't catch a break. First time, ousted by Moak; second time, ousted by hardliners. Agree that he probably shouldn't have run after saying he'd go back to the line once we had a contract. I'm very appreciative of his leadership at a critical juncture for the pilot group, but think BB will do fine as an "implement & enforce the contract" MEC chairman.

IMO I doubt Council 44 folks felt they were represented by the votes of Johnson and Kern. If that is the case their recalls are warranted.

Clamp+1 on being glad these three weren't in charge during negotiations.

You do realize that Kern voted yes on the TA? Johnson voted no, but given the circumstances surrounding his vote, not to sure about his no vote.

That's just like your opinion man


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I love how people are comparing 2 different types of votes like they're apples to apples. And sorry but you would think anyone currently in office is the GOAT.

Now that we have a contract for the next three years, a 30% raise, plus more, I don't really care who is in charge for the near future.

That said, I'm glad the new group was not in charge the last year.