![]() |
Kudos to MEC majority. Finish the house cleaning.
- "It is not necessary to change. Survival is not mandatory." Dr. Ed Deming |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2258410)
We would have had the contract that we now have 6 months sooner. In the spring the negotiating committee outlined what they felt was achievable to the MEC if they were given the latitude to negotiate it. It's a mirror of the TA. Only when the 12 finally gave that approval did we get a TA.
If we are talking TA innuendo, my gut feeling is the vote was probably closer to the usual 60/40, except that members of the MEC, and their constituents voted closer to my line of thinking--and its confirmed with several of the f/os I have flown with: Rather than the home run, it is more like we are finally at the point where the risk is higher than the potential reward. In the meantime, we have (as a union) ushered in a era where we are actually supporting seniority abrogation and merit based incentives. :rolleyes: On another note, if we are talking about mergers, the elected chairman was around for the merger. I suspect there are many lessons learned to do the same and to do differently under his belt. Where was Captain Malone during the merger, and then subsequently aligned himself with DPA rather than reengage. Regardless, a merger committee would be elected and be responsible to the MEC. Additionally, even if a merger were announced TODAY, the wheels roll slowly and the audience is MUCH more in the loop with social media checks and balances--and hyperbole. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2258449)
That was all achievable in the spring.
"WRONG" |
Originally Posted by Bradshaw24
(Post 2258316)
Council 44 Captain reps cucold by the F/O reps they endorsed. You really can't make this stuff up. Get the popcorn.
|
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 2258413)
Doesn't matter. As soon as you stop representing the desires of your constituents you will be in the hot seat.
We will find out soon at the C44 Meeting how ATL pilots feel about their MEC Election votes. Personally I am in favor of recall and will vote accordingly |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2258410)
We would have had the contract that we now have 6 months sooner. In the spring the negotiating committee outlined what they felt was achievable to the MEC if they were given the latitude to negotiate it. It's a mirror of the TA. Only when the 12 finally gave that approval did we get a TA.
Your timeline excluded the AIP documents that caused a backlash and a need for redirection. Oh, and the company pay opener. |
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 2258413)
Doesn't matter. As soon as you stop representing the desires of your constituents you will be in the hot seat.
We will find out soon at the C44 Meeting how ATL pilots feel about their MEC Election votes. Personally I am in favor of recall and will vote accordingly https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/i...c5acrpdsSsSTBq |
the fact that the usual suspects are up in arms and melting down on facebook show me the right decision was made yesterday.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2258449)
That was all achievable in the spring.
Excuse the interruption. But, unfortunately, spring was only 9mos after being lied to by crap union leadership and house cleaning had only just begun. What did you lose in 6mos... Last year it was, "time value of money". Now, it's, "retro too late for Trump rally"? Or did your boss lose his job? |
Originally Posted by kobaracing1
(Post 2258488)
Excuse the interruption.
But, unfortunately, spring was only 9mos after being lied to by crap union leadership and house cleaning had only just begun. What did you lose in 6mos... Last year it was, "time value of money". Now, it's, "retro too late for Trump rally"? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:38 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands