Airline Pilot Central Forums
Page 8 of 14
« First
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   MEC vote (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/98753-mec-vote.html)

Vincent Chase 12-08-2016 07:48 AM
Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 2258449)
That was all achievable in the spring.
Please explain in more detail.

It appears you're hanging an 18 month wait on a new contract on "the dirty dozen."

I'm not in the know in any way, shape, fashion, or form. I'd just like to get answers from one who continually seems to know so much more than us line swine peasants. Can you fill me in (STS) on the details that would prove your assertion above to be correct?

gzsg 12-08-2016 07:55 AM
Originally Posted by Trip7 (Post 2258413)
Doesn't matter. As soon as you stop representing the desires of your constituents you will be in the hot seat.

We will find out soon at the C44 Meeting how ATL pilots feel about their MEC Election votes.

Personally I am in favor of recall and will vote accordingly
You will be alone with the rest of the Apple Dumpling Gang.

JamesBond 12-08-2016 08:06 AM
Originally Posted by SluggoC17 (Post 2258093)
How can we fight against their recalls? And *** don't we have electronic voting for this stuff?
Russian hackers.

JamesBond 12-08-2016 08:07 AM
Originally Posted by gzsg (Post 2258614)
You will be alone with the rest of the Apple Dumpling Gang.
Do you believe your views represent a majority of pilots?

Vincent Chase 12-08-2016 08:08 AM
Originally Posted by JamesBond (Post 2258624)
Russian hackers.
And fake news.

Planetrain 12-08-2016 08:20 AM
Originally Posted by gzsg (Post 2258614)
You will be alone with the rest of the Apple Dumpling Gang.
GZSG:
Just out of curiosity, and it's ok if you are (not judging), but will you be accepting any FPL position in Bartels' committee structure?

Planetrain 12-08-2016 08:22 AM
Originally Posted by notEnuf (Post 2258561)
AIPs were changed. Profit sharing was always a gate keeper issue for us. JMs letter came out because of the backlash on a possible PS give.
Profit sharing changes were NEVER an Agreement In Principle. Are you implying that?

Planetrain 12-08-2016 08:27 AM
Originally Posted by kobaracing1 (Post 2258569)

JMalone also wrote to the membership that he would not seek the MEC chair following this TA... oops.
So what? He changed his mind after being chair for a little over a year. Bartels has been in a union position for about 19 years straight. I don't get the double standard here.

newKnow 12-08-2016 08:45 AM
Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 2258382)
You better hope that nothing important like a merger or significant change in alliances happens in the next 3 years.
Our new MEC chairman is like a sleazy divorce attorney. He never produces a good outcome but sows lots of hate and dicontent along the way! That keeps the billable hours up until the savings accounts are empty.

I actually hope that we can come together, support, and rally behind the new MEC Chairman.

Do you have any factual information to support your claim?

Please, produce it.

gloopy 12-08-2016 08:46 AM
Originally Posted by kobaracing1 (Post 2258507)
More like, "we will say anything to make our side correct". Whatever side that is.
And who cares about getting the same contract in the spring? Its actually better now because we get the pay retro to Jan and none of none of the concessions for almost the whole year. :cool:

Not to mention that all the offers from the company up until now had greater concessions in scope and other sections. The worst "the 12" can be blamed for is a couple months at most, and with full retro who cares. And they deserve credit for a better contract than would have happened without them.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:31 PM.
Page 8 of 14
« First
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands