Tattletale Tuesday
#151
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,563
Likes: 21
#152
Overwhelming majority. 70%+
What Johnson and Kern did to 44 with their MEC executive votes is akin to walking right into the heart of Ohio State's campus and planting a Michigan flag.
Kern nominated someone moderate for a MEC position then voted for a strong 12er. Is is normal to not vote for someone you nominated?
What Johnson and Kern did to 44 with their MEC executive votes is akin to walking right into the heart of Ohio State's campus and planting a Michigan flag.
Kern nominated someone moderate for a MEC position then voted for a strong 12er. Is is normal to not vote for someone you nominated?
What about the 30-40% of ATL pilots who wanted Bartells?
#153
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
He only thinks of himself. He doesn't understand that everyone has different wants/needs. Personally if I told my rep I wanted BB and they voted for JM I'd feel like he doesn't represent my beliefs but I wouldn't take it to a recall. They have the whole picture.
#154
False. You and tunes are like Bert and Ernie. You see one you see the other wherever I post. I expand the team to gather info. Both Capt Reps have stated publically, the feedback they received had OVERWHELMING support for JM.
Last edited by Trip7; 01-28-2017 at 08:32 AM.
#155

What evidence do you have that Malone likely had more support than 70% of ATL pilots?
#156
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
The sad thing is beyond a moakie power grab this screams "pulling up the ladder" You have Captains, Trip7, who are attempting to recall FO reps. These FO reps are looking out for the younger pilots long term (which should include Trip) but the Captains don't want to rock the boat so they are recalling them. This is my opinion.
#157
There is no evidence of specific numbers. The evidence we have is the statement of overwhelming support in feedback received by the Captain reps. Notice how the FO reps don't mention feedback in their decision but more their thought process after "interviewing" JM and BB. Yet in the C44 update prior to the election all CK and JJ stated were give me your input while both SD and SM gave detailed analysis about who they planned to vote for. It's clear that the majority of 44 preferred JM and the FO reps ignored it for their own agenda
#158
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
There is no evidence of specific numbers. The evidence we have is the statement of overwhelming support in feedback received by the Captain reps. Notice how the FO reps don't mention feedback in their decision but more their thought process after "interviewing" JM and BB. Yet in the C44 update prior to the election all CK and JJ stated were give me your input while both SD and SM gave detailed analysis about who they planned to vote for. It's clear that the majority of 44 preferred JM and the FO reps ignored it for their own agenda
#159
#160
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
There is no evidence of specific numbers. The evidence we have is the statement of overwhelming support in feedback received by the Captain reps. Notice how the FO reps don't mention feedback in their decision but more their thought process after "interviewing" JM and BB. Yet in the C44 update prior to the election all CK and JJ stated were give me your input while both SD and SM gave detailed analysis about who they planned to vote for. It's clear that the majority of 44 preferred JM and the FO reps ignored it for their own agenda
I always chuckle at pilots who want their reps to lead by taking polls. That's not how leasership works. At least where I come from.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sinkrate3278
Flight Schools and Training
7
03-22-2011 07:40 PM


. Just worry about your Council and you'll be alright.
