Search

Notices

Tattletale Tuesday

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2017 | 07:18 AM
  #151  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,563
Likes: 21
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
You might need something to get over your chronic grumpiness. Just worry about your Council and you'll be alright.
don't worry, I'm doing my part to ensure Worrall doesn't get back in.
Reply
Old 01-28-2017 | 07:28 AM
  #152  
newKnow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: 765-A
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
Overwhelming majority. 70%+

What Johnson and Kern did to 44 with their MEC executive votes is akin to walking right into the heart of Ohio State's campus and planting a Michigan flag.

Kern nominated someone moderate for a MEC position then voted for a strong 12er. Is is normal to not vote for someone you nominated?
Let''s say you're right and 70% of ATL pilots preferred Malone. Even if that's the case (and it might not be), why do you think 100% of the reps should have voted form him?

What about the 30-40% of ATL pilots who wanted Bartells?
Reply
Old 01-28-2017 | 08:09 AM
  #153  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
Let''s say you're right and 70% of ATL pilots preferred Malone. Even if that's the case (and it might not be), why do you think 100% of the reps should have voted form him?

What about the 30-40% of ATL pilots who wanted Bartells?
He only thinks of himself. He doesn't understand that everyone has different wants/needs. Personally if I told my rep I wanted BB and they voted for JM I'd feel like he doesn't represent my beliefs but I wouldn't take it to a recall. They have the whole picture.
Reply
Old 01-28-2017 | 08:13 AM
  #154  
Trip7's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,198
Likes: 259
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
Let''s say you're right and 70% of ATL pilots preferred Malone. Even if that's the case (and it might not be), why do you think 100% of the reps should have voted form him?

What about the 30-40% of ATL pilots who wanted Bartells?
If 70% was the case, (likely much higher than that) then a 3-1 vote would have been more reasonable similar to the TA vote. 50/50 vote is rediculous for as much support as JM has in 44.

Originally Posted by Peoloto
He only thinks of himself. He doesn't understand that everyone has different wants/needs. Personally if I told my rep I wanted BB and they voted for JM I'd feel like he doesn't represent my beliefs but I wouldn't take it to a recall. They have the whole picture.
False. You and tunes are like Bert and Ernie. You see one you see the other wherever I post. I expand the team to gather info. Both Capt Reps have stated publically, the feedback they received had OVERWHELMING support for JM.

Last edited by Trip7; 01-28-2017 at 08:32 AM.
Reply
Old 01-28-2017 | 08:29 AM
  #155  
newKnow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: 765-A
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
If 70% was the case, (likely much higher than that) then a 3-1 vote would have been more reasonable similar to the TA vote. 50/50 vote is rediculous for as much support as JM has in 44.
If that's your logic, you should recall just one of the Reps.


What evidence do you have that Malone likely had more support than 70% of ATL pilots?
Reply
Old 01-28-2017 | 08:37 AM
  #156  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Default

The sad thing is beyond a moakie power grab this screams "pulling up the ladder" You have Captains, Trip7, who are attempting to recall FO reps. These FO reps are looking out for the younger pilots long term (which should include Trip) but the Captains don't want to rock the boat so they are recalling them. This is my opinion.
Reply
Old 01-28-2017 | 08:44 AM
  #157  
Trip7's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,198
Likes: 259
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
If that's your logic, you should recall just one of the Reps.


What evidence do you have that Malone likely had more support than 70% of ATL pilots?
There is no evidence of specific numbers. The evidence we have is the statement of overwhelming support in feedback received by the Captain reps. Notice how the FO reps don't mention feedback in their decision but more their thought process after "interviewing" JM and BB. Yet in the C44 update prior to the election all CK and JJ stated were give me your input while both SD and SM gave detailed analysis about who they planned to vote for. It's clear that the majority of 44 preferred JM and the FO reps ignored it for their own agenda
Reply
Old 01-28-2017 | 08:52 AM
  #158  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
There is no evidence of specific numbers. The evidence we have is the statement of overwhelming support in feedback received by the Captain reps. Notice how the FO reps don't mention feedback in their decision but more their thought process after "interviewing" JM and BB. Yet in the C44 update prior to the election all CK and JJ stated were give me your input while both SD and SM gave detailed analysis about who they planned to vote for. It's clear that the majority of 44 preferred JM and the FO reps ignored it for their own agenda
Do you think perhaps the Captain reps received their feedback from mostly Captains? So 50% of the base. I'm sure the FOs talk to their own reps.
Reply
Old 01-28-2017 | 09:18 AM
  #159  
Trip7's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,198
Likes: 259
Default

Originally Posted by Peoloto
Do you think perhaps the Captain reps received their feedback from mostly Captains? So 50% of the base. I'm sure the FOs talk to their own reps.
Their own reps? Do only FOs vote for FO reps and vice versa for Capts in elections/recalls? You're on quite a streak here with this and your company will unilaterally impose 9:45 post
Reply
Old 01-28-2017 | 09:18 AM
  #160  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
There is no evidence of specific numbers. The evidence we have is the statement of overwhelming support in feedback received by the Captain reps. Notice how the FO reps don't mention feedback in their decision but more their thought process after "interviewing" JM and BB. Yet in the C44 update prior to the election all CK and JJ stated were give me your input while both SD and SM gave detailed analysis about who they planned to vote for. It's clear that the majority of 44 preferred JM and the FO reps ignored it for their own agenda
So, why do reps vote and not the pilots?

I always chuckle at pilots who want their reps to lead by taking polls. That's not how leasership works. At least where I come from.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Raeamb1
Major
37
09-19-2016 08:28 PM
sinkrate3278
Flight Schools and Training
7
03-22-2011 07:40 PM
vagabond
Foreign
1
09-14-2010 10:08 AM
joel payne
Foreign
48
11-19-2009 04:28 PM
block30
Technical
34
10-24-2009 09:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices