Horizontal Stabilizer (Tail) Stall Warning
10-20-2009, 08:33 PM
#1
Bracing for Fallacies
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Posts: 3,543
Horizontal Stabilizer (Tail) Stall Warning
Greetings,
Just a thought; If wings can stall, and therefore have stall warning devices on them, why not on the tail?
A tail stall is rare, but quite dangerous, and mixing up a "regular" stall from tail stall is deadly.
I don't want to dig too far into the Colgan loss, but maybe if the aircraft had installed BOTH wing and tail stall warning vanes the crew would have been able to accurately differentiate between the two stalls and apply appropriate stall recovery.
This is an 'easier said than done' issue I realize, BUT---the importance of such a system cannot be overlooked especially for Flight Into Known Ice aircraft.
A tail stall warning device would stack the deck in OUR favor.
With honor and respect for the Colgan passengers AND crew,
block30
Just a thought; If wings can stall, and therefore have stall warning devices on them, why not on the tail?
A tail stall is rare, but quite dangerous, and mixing up a "regular" stall from tail stall is deadly. I don't want to dig too far into the Colgan loss, but maybe if the aircraft had installed BOTH wing and tail stall warning vanes the crew would have been able to accurately differentiate between the two stalls and apply appropriate stall recovery.
This is an 'easier said than done' issue I realize, BUT---the importance of such a system cannot be overlooked especially for Flight Into Known Ice aircraft.
A tail stall warning device would stack the deck in OUR favor.
With honor and respect for the Colgan passengers AND crew,
block30
10-20-2009, 08:43 PM
#2
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 55
Originally Posted by block30
Greetings,
Just a thought; If wings can stall, and therefore have stall warning devices on them, why not on the tail? A tail stall is rare, but quite dangerous, and mixing up a "regular" stall from tail stall is deadly.
I don't want to dig too far into the Colgan loss, but maybe if the aircraft had installed BOTH wing and tail stall warning vanes the crew would have been able to accurately differentiate between the two stalls and apply appropriate stall recovery.
This is an 'easier said than done' issue I realize, BUT---the importance of such a system cannot be overlooked especially for Flight Into Known Ice aircraft.
A tail stall warning device would stack the deck in OUR favor.
With honor and respect for the Colgan passengers AND crew,
block30
Just a thought; If wings can stall, and therefore have stall warning devices on them, why not on the tail?
A tail stall is rare, but quite dangerous, and mixing up a "regular" stall from tail stall is deadly. I don't want to dig too far into the Colgan loss, but maybe if the aircraft had installed BOTH wing and tail stall warning vanes the crew would have been able to accurately differentiate between the two stalls and apply appropriate stall recovery.
This is an 'easier said than done' issue I realize, BUT---the importance of such a system cannot be overlooked especially for Flight Into Known Ice aircraft.
A tail stall warning device would stack the deck in OUR favor.
With honor and respect for the Colgan passengers AND crew,
block30
10-20-2009, 10:35 PM
#3
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 317
Originally Posted by oneflynfool
It seems that tail stall accidents/incidents are more prevalent in icing conditions.
As for inaccuracies, I can only speculate, but I would assume if they developed the system those inaccuracies would and could be accounted for.
10-21-2009, 06:55 AM
#4
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,277
I don't believe the colgan crew thought about a tail stall, much less tried to recover from one. I'm not sure either of them even knew there was such a thing as a tail stall.
I also don't think they had a tail stall...they just got real slow.
I also don't think they had a tail stall...they just got real slow.
10-21-2009, 07:15 AM
#5
Bracing for Fallacies
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Posts: 3,543
Originally Posted by rickair7777
I don't believe the colgan crew thought about a tail stall, much less tried to recover from one. I'm not sure either of them even knew there was such a thing as a tail stall.
I also don't think they had a tail stall...they just got real slow.
I also don't think they had a tail stall...they just got real slow.
I just read an article that said the captain had watched NASAs icing video a few months previously. And for anyone who has watched that video, a large segment is dedicated to tail stalls.
I know particularly the video discusses a sign of tail stall is buffet in the controls versus an airframe buffet. Did the pilot confuse the shaker with a control wheel buffet? I don't know. I think he is being written off as an idiot waaaay too easily from our spot here on terra firma.
God bless.
10-21-2009, 07:20 AM
#6
Bracing for Fallacies
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Posts: 3,543
As far as inaccuracies due to ice; The wing stall warning system needs to be heated correct? Does that stall warning system work well in icing conditions?
I'm sure that is hard to tell because not many people have gotten truly close to stall in real icing conditions!
But I would think the same principle would apply to a tail stall warning device. The warning device should be heated.
Once again easier said than done, but it sure seems like a great cost to benefit ratio if these would be installed.
I'm sure that is hard to tell because not many people have gotten truly close to stall in real icing conditions!
But I would think the same principle would apply to a tail stall warning device. The warning device should be heated.
Once again easier said than done, but it sure seems like a great cost to benefit ratio if these would be installed.
10-21-2009, 02:47 PM
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,096
Originally Posted by block30
The evidence does point to a plain old wing stall versus tail stall, but what did the crew think was happening? Most importantly can we prevent other crews from thinking the wrong thing?
I just read an article that said the captain had watched NASAs icing video a few months previously. And for anyone who has watched that video, a large segment is dedicated to tail stalls.
I know particularly the video discusses a sign of tail stall is buffet in the controls versus an airframe buffet. Did the pilot confuse the shaker with a control wheel buffet? I don't know. I think he is being written off as an idiot waaaay too easily from our spot here on terra firma.
God bless.
I just read an article that said the captain had watched NASAs icing video a few months previously. And for anyone who has watched that video, a large segment is dedicated to tail stalls.
I know particularly the video discusses a sign of tail stall is buffet in the controls versus an airframe buffet. Did the pilot confuse the shaker with a control wheel buffet? I don't know. I think he is being written off as an idiot waaaay too easily from our spot here on terra firma.
God bless.
So, the more important question is, how do we get crews to succesfully identify and react appropiately to WING STALLS?
Why are people so stuck on the tail ice problems? It has NOTHING to do with this accident.
This accident was about a complete lack of professionalism in the cockpit, a complete loss of situational awareness, and the pilots incorrecty reacting to an aural and physical warning system that was trying to alert the pilots to the rapid loss of airspeed.
10-21-2009, 05:45 PM
#8
Bracing for Fallacies
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Posts: 3,543
Playing devil's advocate here;
Let's look at this another way, the crew did everything correctly for a tail stall (possibly minus the full power). Was that just coincidence or did they believe there was a tail stall?
Did the crew mis-diagnose the problem? Obviously. Would a tail stall warning device help others in the future? That is the main point.
Let's look at this another way, the crew did everything correctly for a tail stall (possibly minus the full power). Was that just coincidence or did they believe there was a tail stall?
Did the crew mis-diagnose the problem? Obviously. Would a tail stall warning device help others in the future? That is the main point.
10-21-2009, 07:06 PM
#9
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,277
Originally Posted by block30
Playing devil's advocate here;
Let's look at this another way, the crew did everything correctly for a tail stall (possibly minus the full power). Was that just coincidence or did they believe there was a tail stall?
Let's look at this another way, the crew did everything correctly for a tail stall (possibly minus the full power). Was that just coincidence or did they believe there was a tail stall?
Originally Posted by block30
Did the crew mis-diagnose the problem? Obviously.
Originally Posted by block30
Would a tail stall warning device help others in the future? That is the main point.
10-21-2009, 07:54 PM
#10
Bracing for Fallacies
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Posts: 3,543
That's too bad. Further, there is likely no company who will pony up the money to take the initiative in this realm. A tail stall warning system *seems* like a fairly simple risk management tool that could clear up confusion at a very critical time. At least in my mind the system would.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
