Tattletale Tuesday

Reply Subscribe

Page 17 of 18

« First

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

01-28-2017 | 09:55 AM

#161

newKnow

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 6,844

Likes: 0

From: 765-A

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trip7

There is no evidence of specific numbers. The evidence we have is the statement of overwhelming support in feedback received by the Captain reps. Notice how the FO reps don't mention feedback in their decision but more their thought process after "interviewing" JM and BB. Yet in the C44 update prior to the election all CK and JJ stated were give me your input while both SD and SM gave detailed analysis about who they planned to vote for. It's clear that the majority of 44 preferred JM and the FO reps ignored it for their own agenda

15% of ATL pilots voted against the TA. I would assume almost all of those pilots would be against Malone. But, that's just a guess.

Of the 85% that voted for the TA, how is it that you are so sure that the vast majority of them were for Malone. I heard a lot of lukewarm support for the TA, especially from mid level FO's -- even ATL FOs.

I've been pretty bad at judging sentiment lately. I'm just wondering how you can be so sure?

I guess we'll find out.

01-28-2017 | 10:29 AM

#162

BobZ

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Jun 2015

Posts: 4,116

Likes: 1

its likely the tie between reps and their constituency would be far more legitimate, and far better served with a seniority block model.

01-28-2017 | 11:28 AM

#163

fly2002

On Reserve

Joined: Apr 2009

Posts: 137

Likes: 6

From: DAL FO

The MEC chairman is elected by reps. You don't get a vote on the MEC chairman. That's by design. You guys are too funny. Wuzthatforus isn't correct.

01-28-2017 | 11:33 AM

#164

buckleyboy

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Oct 2011

Posts: 534

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trip7

You might need something to get over your chronic grumpiness

. Just worry about your Council and you'll be alright.

If you are right when you say "So goes 44, so goes the MEC," wouldn't tunes have every reason to not just worry about his council?

01-28-2017 | 12:02 PM

#165

Wuzatforus

Thread Starter

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Jun 2015

Posts: 300

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by fly2002

The MEC chairman is elected by reps. You don't get a vote on the MEC chairman. That's by design. You guys are too funny. Wuzthatforus isn't correct.

What am I incorrect about?

01-29-2017 | 02:49 PM

#166

Sobchak

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Sep 2010

Posts: 115

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by tunes

don't worry, I'm doing my part to ensure Worrall doesn't get back in.

Has anybody stepped up to oppose RW yet? I haven't seen anything in writing.

01-29-2017 | 04:08 PM

#167

gzsg

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Oct 2009

Posts: 3,108

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trip7

The plan is to nominate 2 moderate and reasonable FO reps that will vote according to the will of 44 like the CA reps do(So goes 44, so goes the MEC). The Council needs to be well represented now that the new regime is in power. Especially if they are attempting to make big changes to MEC policy as outlined in Captain Worrall's communique.

2 Moakie drones who have run before. O'Mahoney and Nestor. God help us.