|
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 2289947)
There is no evidence of specific numbers. The evidence we have is the statement of overwhelming support in feedback received by the Captain reps. Notice how the FO reps don't mention feedback in their decision but more their thought process after "interviewing" JM and BB. Yet in the C44 update prior to the election all CK and JJ stated were give me your input while both SD and SM gave detailed analysis about who they planned to vote for. It's clear that the majority of 44 preferred JM and the FO reps ignored it for their own agenda
Of the 85% that voted for the TA, how is it that you are so sure that the vast majority of them were for Malone. I heard a lot of lukewarm support for the TA, especially from mid level FO's -- even ATL FOs. I've been pretty bad at judging sentiment lately. I'm just wondering how you can be so sure? I guess we'll find out. :D |
its likely the tie between reps and their constituency would be far more legitimate, and far better served with a seniority block model.
|
The MEC chairman is elected by reps. You don't get a vote on the MEC chairman. That's by design. You guys are too funny. Wuzthatforus isn't correct.
|
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 2289818)
You might need something to get over your chronic grumpiness:D. Just worry about your Council and you'll be alright.
|
Originally Posted by fly2002
(Post 2290069)
The MEC chairman is elected by reps. You don't get a vote on the MEC chairman. That's by design. You guys are too funny. Wuzthatforus isn't correct.
|
Originally Posted by tunes
(Post 2289877)
don't worry, I'm doing my part to ensure Worrall doesn't get back in. :D
|
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 2289797)
The plan is to nominate 2 moderate and reasonable FO reps that will vote according to the will of 44 like the CA reps do(So goes 44, so goes the MEC). The Council needs to be well represented now that the new regime is in power. Especially if they are attempting to make big changes to MEC policy as outlined in Captain Worrall's communique.
|
Originally Posted by Sobchak
(Post 2290793)
Has anybody stepped up to oppose RW yet? I haven't seen anything in writing.
|
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 2290833)
2 Moakie drones who have run before. O'Mahoney and Nestor. God help us.
|
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 2290833)
2 Moakie drones who have run before. O'Mahoney and Nestor. God help us.
|
Originally Posted by Hillbilly
(Post 2291535)
O'Mahoney is a Captain. You pull stuff out of your rump with the best of 'em.
He is allllllll over the place. Just throwing random stuff against the wall trying to get a rise at every corner... |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 2291561)
He is allllllll over the place. Just throwing random stuff against the wall trying to get a rise at every corner...
Gszg/DPA and the old guard/Moakists are on extreme opposite sides of the labor relations spectrum. Although I'll go Moakist any day of the week over Fakenews gszg/DPA, both ends of the spectrum can and have proven to be damaging. Moderate views like Captain Malone's and the C44 CA reps have proven to be successful multiple times in DALPA History. |
Originally Posted by cornbeef007
(Post 2289067)
You don't think this went on with DALPA in the past? The only difference is that the "Dirty Dozen" had the integrity to do it in public, knowing full well there would be blowback.
|
Originally Posted by tunes
(Post 2289608)
to answer your question...he was hired less than 3 years ago.
The further you are from ATL, the better Delta is. No truer words were ever spoken IMHO. |
Originally Posted by Vincent Chase
(Post 2291760)
I got a piece of advice from someone a few years ago. That piece was this...
The further you are from ATL, the better Delta is. No truer words were ever spoken IMHO. |
Resistance is futile....submit.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:40 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands