Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
The egregious actions of C44 FO reps >

The egregious actions of C44 FO reps

Search
Notices

The egregious actions of C44 FO reps

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2017, 07:03 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,032
Default The egregious actions of C44 FO reps

What are they? Why do they warrant a recall?
notEnuf is offline  
Old 01-28-2017, 07:19 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,504
Default

they are so yuuuuuuge we just don't talk about them
tunes is offline  
Old 01-28-2017, 07:25 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Moondog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 558
Default

They bucked the "old guard" and they are ****ed about it. Much ado about nothing. As a 44 FO I'm voting to keep them!!
Moondog is offline  
Old 01-28-2017, 07:35 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Egregious derives from the Latin word egregius, meaning "distinguished" or "eminent." In its earliest English uses, egregious was a compliment to someone who had a remarkably good quality that placed him or her eminently above others. That's how English philosopher and theorist Thomas Hobbes used it in flattering a colleague when he remarked, "I am not so egregious a mathematician as you are." Since Hobbes' day, however, the meaning of the word has become noticeably less complimentary, possibly as a result of ironic use of its original sense.

--Merriam-Webster dictionary
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 01-28-2017, 08:58 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Position: C-17 IP
Posts: 143
Default

With the exception of Trip7 were there any other FOs pushing for the recalls? Or just Captains? I voted against the recall. This whole thing is ridiculous.
SluggoC17 is offline  
Old 01-28-2017, 09:10 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 300
Default

The Flower Fund got low!

Seriously, this is one of the high crimes and misdemeanors accusations being circulated.

The email chain actually says it got to $0. It didn't. I'm told it dipped below $2000 temporarily (while in the heat of negotiations, by the way).

C44 is being rolled. So will the rest of us.
Wuzatforus is offline  
Old 01-28-2017, 10:28 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 270
Default

Originally Posted by tomgoodman View Post
Egregious derives from the Latin word egregius, meaning "distinguished" or "eminent." In its earliest English uses, egregious was a compliment to someone who had a remarkably good quality that placed him or her eminently above others. That's how English philosopher and theorist Thomas Hobbes used it in flattering a colleague when he remarked, "I am not so egregious a mathematician as you are." Since Hobbes' day, however, the meaning of the word has become noticeably less complimentary, possibly as a result of ironic use of its original sense.

--Merriam-Webster dictionary
Man you are one bored dude!!!
lake is offline  
Old 01-28-2017, 10:54 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Originally Posted by lake View Post
Man you are one bored dude!!!
Nah, just studied Latin years ago. The word comes from "grex", meaning flock or herd, so egregious behavior meant "that which is not typical of the herd".

Now someone who re-fights a past election...there is a bored dude!
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 01-28-2017, 11:10 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Most I have talked with are upset they went against the memberships wishes in joining the group of 12 trying to delay or block a contract and the tactic used. Under overwhelming pressure from the membership they reversed that position however again even with overwhelming member support opposed the agreement reached. One did vote for it again with a landslide of member support forcing the issue. The other rep voted no against his own membership.
The vote for the chairman again went against the membership and ran afoul of the integrity many expect of their reps.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 01-28-2017, 11:25 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Posts: 534
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
Most I have talked with are upset they went against the memberships wishes in joining the group of 12 trying to delay or block a contract and the tactic used. Under overwhelming pressure from the membership they reversed that position however again even with overwhelming member support opposed the agreement reached. One did vote for it again with a landslide of member support forcing the issue. The other rep voted no against his own membership.
The vote for the chairman again went against the membership and ran afoul of the integrity many expect of their reps.
Objection, your honor. Pure speculation. Counsel has only submitted anecdotal evidence of the wishes of the membership were/are.
buckleyboy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PasserOGas
Major
13
05-07-2016 05:50 PM
gzsg
Delta
2
11-02-2015 12:36 PM
TheManager
Major
9584
07-28-2015 12:15 PM
NavyCal
United
65
12-18-2012 10:00 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices