Originally Posted by Farmlover (Post 1425175)

Hats are not required per the contract so lets hope it stays that way. Nothing worse looking than a silly pilot hat...

Originally Posted by Farmlover (Post 1425175)

Hats are not required per the contract so lets hope it stays that way. Nothing worse looking than a silly pilot hat...

Originally Posted by Ftrooppilot (Post 1425179)

I assume you were never in the military. :eek:

Originally Posted by MrMustache (Post 1424995)

Nope... Good deflection though. I am myself, just know you from Airlink.

Originally Posted by Redbird611 (Post 1425202)

Except the military generally doesn't wear covers indoors, which is where passengers will most likely encounter crew members. I never liked wearing the hat indoors and will gladly exercise my option not to until the rule (or my employer) changes.

Originally Posted by ShyGuy (Post 1425228)

Yeah right. Joined May with 60+ posts already, while conveniently MunkyButtr hasn't posted since Apr 23. No one comes out that fast, that aggressive that quickly.

Originally Posted by ShyGuy (Post 1425228)

Yeah right. Joined May with 60+ posts already, while conveniently MunkyButtr hasn't posted since Apr 23. No one comes out that fast, that aggressive that quickly.

Originally Posted by Ultralight (Post 1425240)

Remember in El Paso when the mechanics hat blew off his head next to a running jet engine, and he went after it?

Thats why hats are not practical in this industry.

Originally Posted by MrMustache (Post 1425314)

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1425343)

You're barking up the wrong tree, Shy. They are posting thousands of miles away from each other.

Originally Posted by cencal83406 (Post 1422308)

Man, MA, it's always someone else's fault. Number one, a name change doesn't change the fact that the airline has killed passengers in the past - and oh by the way in 1991 it was doing the same operation as it is doing today - flying feeder work for a major. Potentially the only difference being 135 carrier vs 121. Don't know for sure though. Fact is, you went to an airline with an accident history. You are lucky they weren't shut down, otherwise you wouldn't have had a JetU to go to to learn new hire ground school at a slower rate.

And what's this about "protecting pilots"? And not ratting them out? I'm pretty sure you used to brag on airlink about being allowed to do certain things when you were an FO, that most of the rest of us would just look at our FOM and think, well, says I can't do it. I'm totally the pot here, but you are no angel when it comes to doing things that might have needed ALPA protection.

Originally Posted by ShyGuy (Post 1509954)

You really like using initials don't you, Mr. RB? You know, Mr. Tyrannosaurus - _____, if you are willing to publicly trash someone with false accusations of FOM violations, you should at least have the courtesy of putting your name to the post. I extend you the same courtesy you offered me. Looking forward to your posts now that I know who you are and your attacks are no longer anonymous.

Originally Posted by ShyGuy (Post 1509954)

You really like using initials don't you, Mr. RB? You know, Mr. Tyrannosaurus - _____, if you are willing to publicly trash someone with false accusations of FOM violations, you should at least have the courtesy of putting your name to the post. I extend you the same courtesy you offered me. Looking forward to your posts now that I know who you are and your attacks are no longer anonymous.

Originally Posted by IBPilot (Post 1510084)

ok it's time for a thread in the mainline section entitled "tool of the decade" because anyone who spends 4 months researching someone then revives a 4 month old thread to call him out definitely wins that one hands down.....