Search
Notices
Endeavor Air Regional Airline

Endeavor to Delta

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-27-2014, 06:30 PM
  #351  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah View Post
The two ALPA attorneys we have said that by not giving the SSP's to FO's, Delta is forced to hire anyone that applies to the SSP under the Bridge Agreement quota's. This makes sense, since if you give the SSP to FO's, Delta can bottom out the list in 6 months, and end the program.
What? So the pass rate is 100%?
gloopy is offline  
Old 10-27-2014, 06:48 PM
  #352  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
What? So the pass rate is 100%?
They have to hire 8 SSP's per month. So if only 6 apply, they have to hire all 6, and 6 FO's.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 10-27-2014, 07:11 PM
  #353  
Looking for a laugh
 
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah View Post
They have to hire 8 SSP's per month. So if only 6 apply, they have to hire all 6, and 6 FO's.
After dealing with Delta management for close to 20 years, I find it hard to believe that they would negotiate or start a program which ties their hands in regards to making a decision about who they want working there. ALPA attorneys have a poor track record of beating Delta management with one of their own documents.
Justdoinmyjob is offline  
Old 10-27-2014, 11:38 PM
  #354  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 479
Default

Originally Posted by mooney View Post
but in 12 more years you get a guaranteed Delta interview with a 50% shot at getting the job!
Lifer, did you pass up your ssp?
8JRMfortheyear is offline  
Old 10-28-2014, 03:11 AM
  #355  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 318
Default

Originally Posted by bonesbrigade View Post
Hey Dakota... I just accomplished that. THe trick is that you have to choose a "voluntary displacement". I tried for 3 awards to get to LGA where there are 40 people junior to my number, but was never successful. THen I changed my tactic and volunteered for a voluntary displacement and was immediately awarded it on the next bid. It'll greatly improve my commute and schedule.
Ha now I have a feeling I know who you are, not that that matters. I saw the voluntary displacement works and considered doing it on 14-08...until I saw the increase in reserve levels at LGA. Personally, if there is ANY chance I'll be on reserve at LGA, then I'd rather stay at JFK. I don't see people stopping the chasing of schedule quality between the two bases so there will always be some junior movement. I'm just going to stay here and watch the poop show.
pa28dakota is offline  
Old 10-28-2014, 09:31 AM
  #356  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mooney's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: CL-65 captain
Posts: 2,244
Default

Originally Posted by 8JRMfortheyear View Post
Lifer, did you pass up your ssp?
Actually, yes I did tough guy. Have anything else to input?
And what does that have to do with my post which is obviously sarcastic?
mooney is offline  
Old 10-28-2014, 11:36 AM
  #357  
Gets Weekends Off
 
jethikoki's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 471
Default

Originally Posted by 8JRMfortheyear View Post
Lifer, did you pass up your ssp?
It appears some may like to use the term "lifer" as if its something bad. Another way of trying to put down people at the lower echelon who have the least power and more then likely not very responsible for inability to move up into mainline positions. Was any regional lifer responsible for giving up scope or downsizing? Tie that in with ALPA and mainline allowing non-apla pilots to cut in line to be offered positions at mainline without starting at the true bottom of the industry. You get what you have now with more people stagnating at the top of the regionals rather then continuing on into mainline jobs. The broken one sided system that ALPA and mainline pilots created and allowed to evolve is the primary reason you get so many so called lifers. I just find it funny how people chastise those at the bottom with least power and fighting about the crumbs thrown out by management, ALPA and mainline pilots rather then directing it at those most responsible.
jethikoki is offline  
Old 10-28-2014, 11:40 AM
  #358  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,504
Default

1 etd interviewee today and 1 hire
tunes is offline  
Old 10-28-2014, 11:56 AM
  #359  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
The company could hire whoever they want though. That's why this is so silly. They could waive the entire interview and just invite people down for fingerprinting and ID pics and tell them to show in jeans and a t-shirt, right along side others who are going through the same suit and tie 2 day. In any case, now that the medical is gone, day 2 is just a couple hours and the standards for hire are 100% under the company's control anyway.

If DL wants to hire 9E FO's, they can hire as many of them as apply, to whatever standards they want. They don't need "the union" to do any of it.
All the above is spot on. There must be hundreds of posts where pilots seem to assume that unions control the seniority lists and who is hired. Those are management functions. Management can hire anyone they want with any method they want. They also control mergers. I can't tell you how many times I have heard "If only DALPA would merge the lists or put us on their list." DALPA does not control those issues and does not merge airlines, management does.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 10-28-2014, 03:44 PM
  #360  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 318
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
The company could hire whoever they want though. That's why this is so silly. They could waive the entire interview and just invite people down for fingerprinting and ID pics and tell them to show in jeans and a t-shirt, right along side others who are going through the same suit and tie 2 day. In any case, now that the medical is gone, day 2 is just a couple hours and the standards for hire are 100% under the company's control anyway.

If DL wants to hire 9E FO's, they can hire as many of them as apply, to whatever standards they want. They don't need "the union" to do any of it.
I did not mean to imply that the union has anything to do with DAL managements hiring practices. They are an integral part of the Bridge Agreement/SSP however. As far as I understand it (which could be very wrong), once all pilots from the time the bankruptcy contract was signed interview through the SSP the Bridge Agreement is done. Therefore, if the union prevents the SSP from being extended to FOs, with a shrinking carrier, they are thinking that'll hold the Bridge Agreement intact thus forcing DAL to hire X number or pilots per class regardless if the SSP is stalled because all Captains have interviewed...theoretically until the entire list is exhausted.
pa28dakota is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
Sir James
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 06:28 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-15-2006 09:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices