Search

Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

Here Comes Swayne

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-2018 | 04:01 PM
  #121  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by bigtime209
THIS^^^^^There are numerous completed apps on file at AA from well qualified Envoy pilots that have the PIC time, the check airman box checked, 4 year degree, etc....Anyone that says the only reason AA isn't hiring more from Envoy is due to lack of qualified apps is full of sh*t.
Your answer is after Flows, 76% of off the street hires are military. You’ve got a 24% chance of making it happen.
Old 09-02-2018 | 04:16 PM
  #122  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Default

No puppet?
Old 09-02-2018 | 04:46 PM
  #123  
TransWorld's Avatar
Gets Everyday Off
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 1
From: Fully Retired
Default

Originally Posted by lavMan
Your answer is after Flows, 76% of off the street hires are military. You’ve got a 24% chance of making it happen.
Over the next few years, hiring numbers at American will increase. This year’s target is 900 (or 930). In just 5 years, mandatory retirement will be 957 for the year, up from 528 this year.

That means one of three things. Flow numbers will increase. OTS Military will increase. OTS Civilian will increase. Or some of all of the above.

I have a furrowed brow as to how many more OTS Military can increase, unless AA is able to steal more from the other majors hiring stream. How many more will be hired from flow each month? Some more, but at some point AA does not want to cave in their WO.

My crystal ball says, while flows will increase some, there will be a significant increase in OTS Civilian (more than the 9% of total hires in 2017). Flow will still be bigger than OTS Civilian, but the 9% was a drop in the bucket last year.

Things are about to get real interesting.
Old 09-02-2018 | 08:07 PM
  #124  
SoFloFlyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
5 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 210
Default

Originally Posted by TransWorld
Over the next few years, hiring numbers at American will increase. This year’s target is 900 (or 930). In just 5 years, mandatory retirement will be 957 for the year, up from 528 this year.

That means one of three things. Flow numbers will increase. OTS Military will increase. OTS Civilian will increase. Or some of all of the above.

I have a furrowed brow as to how many more OTS Military can increase, unless AA is able to steal more from the other majors hiring stream. How many more will be hired from flow each month? Some more, but at some point AA does not want to cave in their WO.

My crystal ball says, while flows will increase some, there will be a significant increase in OTS Civilian (more than the 9% of total hires in 2017). Flow will still be bigger than OTS Civilian, but the 9% was a drop in the bucket last year.

Things are about to get real interesting.
I’m looking forward to the difference in airline economics in the next decade than the past 2 or so decades. AA is my dream, but I don’t want to limit myself to a WO since I’m not military. I would be working towards as much TPIC, CKA, 4 year degree, and I am a minority, but I don’t believe that should matter. Only the most qualified should get a call, but I’m no recruiter so it is what it is.
Old 09-03-2018 | 03:52 PM
  #125  
PRS Guitars's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,329
Likes: 4
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by EmbaeDriver
2 year flow yea yea good luck with that
He won't be waiting for the flow. He doesn't strike me as the type to sit back and wait for 6 to 9 years. I meant he'll be picked up by DAL, UAL, SWA, FDX, UPS or AA outside the flow. He probably has a solid network built.
Old 09-03-2018 | 08:48 PM
  #126  
SoFloFlyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
5 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 210
Default

Originally Posted by PRS Guitars
He won't be waiting for the flow. He doesn't strike me as the type to sit back and wait for 6 to 9 years. I meant he'll be picked up by DAL, UAL, SWA, FDX, UPS or AA outside the flow. He probably has a solid network built.
Just to add to this. Y’all better befriend him and stop taking a dump on his success thus far. Besides potentially having a decent network (or does?), he seems like an awesome guy to be around.
Old 09-04-2018 | 05:12 AM
  #127  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PRS Guitars
He won't be waiting for the flow. He doesn't strike me as the type to sit back and wait for 6 to 9 years. I meant he'll be picked up by DAL, UAL, SWA, FDX, UPS or AA outside the flow. He probably has a solid network built.
This brings up a question. Let's say a swayne-type person gets a couple of years of 121 time and gets an interview invitation at a major at 25. At the same time, a 40-year old captain who works for the same regional as the other guy and has at least twice the flight time and comparable educational credentials and achievements does not get an invite while applying during the same window. Isn't this a definition of age-based discrimination? Not even talking about the performance comparison during the interview because one of the two pilots hasn't even been given an opportunity to perform. Thoughts?

Last edited by pilotmunk; 09-04-2018 at 05:39 AM.
Old 09-04-2018 | 05:46 AM
  #128  
Senior LH
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: 320 CA
Default

Happens every day unfortunately.

Originally Posted by pilotmunk
This brings up a question. Let's say a swayne-type person gets a couple of years of 121 time and gets an interview invitation at a major at 25. At the same time, a 40-year old captain who works for the same regional as the other guy and has at least twice the flight time and comparable educational credentials and achievements does not get an invite while applying during the same window. Isn't this a definition of age-based discrimination? Not even talking about the performance comparison during the interview because one of the two pilots hasn't even been given an opportunity to perform. Thoughts?
Old 09-04-2018 | 07:26 AM
  #129  
PRS Guitars's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,329
Likes: 4
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by pilotmunk
This brings up a question. Let's say a swayne-type person gets a couple of years of 121 time and gets an interview invitation at a major at 25. At the same time, a 40-year old captain who works for the same regional as the other guy and has at least twice the flight time and comparable educational credentials and achievements does not get an invite while applying during the same window. Isn't this a definition of age-based discrimination? Not even talking about the performance comparison during the interview because one of the two pilots hasn't even been given an opportunity to perform. Thoughts?
The majors are hiring guys in their 60’s right now, so it’s going to be tough to prove age discrimination. He seems like the type of guy who will take to the steps to bolster his resume. He probably has some good mentors as well. This is what will get him an invite, not his age or his Vlog. He will put the work in, that’s not a knock on anybody here waiting to flow, just an observation based off watching the one video in the link.
Old 09-04-2018 | 07:58 AM
  #130  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PRS Guitars
The majors are hiring guys in their 60’s right now, so it’s going to be tough to prove age discrimination. He seems like the type of guy who will take to the steps to bolster his resume. He probably has some good mentors as well. This is what will get him an invite, not his age or his Vlog. He will put the work in, that’s not a knock on anybody here waiting to flow, just an observation based off watching the one video in the link.
Again, not talking about being hired but simply about being called in for an interview, i.e. being given an equal opportunity. One could argue that it doesn't matter how many candidates who are older than our 40-year old captain are invited to interview - as long as there's at least one less experienced younger person invited in place of a more experienced 40-year old, there's a case of ageism.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices