Here Comes Swayne
#271
#272
Banned
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
We had one guy get into “Cecil’s” office to ask his advice and he got hired at mainline. I think after that one there was a stampede of Eagle drivers over to Cecil’s office. But they couldn’t get in to see him.
Got to have a gimmick bros.
On a side note. There’s NO WAY Eagle would have allowed videos to be made by a pilot back in the bad old days. That companies behavior couldn’t stand the light of day. So we wouldn’t have had that gimmick available to us.
Got to have a gimmick bros.
On a side note. There’s NO WAY Eagle would have allowed videos to be made by a pilot back in the bad old days. That companies behavior couldn’t stand the light of day. So we wouldn’t have had that gimmick available to us.
Last edited by V12Merlin; 02-06-2019 at 07:05 AM.
#274
Keep in mind that when someone chooses to become a public figure on Youtube, they give up much of their expectation of privacy.
#276
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 4,174
Likes: 157
There also is no rule that just because someone is "nice guy" or "good pilot" makes them immune to people not liking what they may or may not be doing.
#277
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
From: Resigned
I for one appreciate that they don’t crack down on stuff like this. Is it totally professional to do a thread like this? No, but this also isn’t an aa.com email chain. Anyway, the people demand a disgusting mustache.
#278
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 12
Usually on board with much of what you have to say, but why in the world would a thread like this not be allowed? There are some "posts" in it that are inflammatory or libel but there is no rule about discussing someone that posts on YouTube.
There also is no rule that just because someone is "nice guy" or "good pilot" makes them immune to people not liking what they may or may not be doing.
There also is no rule that just because someone is "nice guy" or "good pilot" makes them immune to people not liking what they may or may not be doing.
Now, that's all I'll say on this matter, in this thread or anywhere else, because my comments seem to have me teetering on being banned.
#280
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
That's a rather extraordinary claim.
An open avenue for discussion/criticism of a PUBLIC figure must NECESSARILY enable "shaming" and "bullying," along with legitimate scrutiny. You can regard it as an unfortunate "side effect" if you wish, but don't allow yourself to operate under the illusion that all the resentment, unfair criticism, and nasty thoughts will suddenly evaporate from the minds of "haters" once you forcefully muzzle all discussion of someone's publicly-distributed product.


