Originally Posted by martyByrde
(Post 2844792)
Regardless of who is at fault, I believe the union doesn't know what to do. The answer to failed negotiations can’t be a do-nothing, business as usual, “cool down period.” And if the union is banking on low new-hire turnout to become their leverage, don’t forget what happened when the company needed DECs.
|
Originally Posted by LowvalueFO
(Post 2844783)
I am going to say there is a 50/50 at fault here - the union went too far, should have just asked for no concessions and straight up pay increases only. That's what PSA and Piedmont got.
While it would have been nice, now we are getting delayed even further on the pay ... MANAGEMENT is the one saying they, themselves, went too far. AIP or nothing should be everyone's stance right now. |
Originally Posted by Cyio
(Post 2844855)
You are completely wrong. Hell the union did great, the company screwed up. If we took just pay at this point it would be weak and anger many people.
Meanwhile, the other 2 WO's get paid, while you get 0, nada, zilch. Pedro saves millions on a monthly basis and looks good in the eyes of Daddy AA. |
Originally Posted by Cyio
(Post 2844855)
You are completely wrong. Hell the union did great, the company screwed up. If we took just pay at this point it would be weak and anger many people.
|
Lot of newer accounts on here saying “pay raise now at any cost!” today.
|
Originally Posted by LowvalueFO
(Post 2844871)
You really don't get it, they got played like many times before ...
Meanwhile, the other 2 WO's get paid, while you get 0, nada, zilch. Pedro saves millions on a monthly basis and looks good in the eyes of Daddy AA. |
Originally Posted by LowvalueFO
(Post 2844871)
You really don't get it, they got played like many times before ...
Meanwhile, the other 2 WO's get paid, while you get 0, nada, zilch. Pedro saves millions on a monthly basis and looks good in the eyes of Daddy AA. |
Originally Posted by LowvalueFO
(Post 2844783)
I am going to say there is a 50/50 at fault here - the union went too far, should have just asked for no concessions and straight up pay increases only. That's what PSA and Piedmont got.
While it would have been nice, now we are getting delayed even further on the pay ... |
Hold the line!
Demand the AIP! |
Originally Posted by highfarfast
(Post 2844892)
Hold our ground for AIP, which includes backpay. It all works out.
This right where. Nothing and I mean NOTHING less than this. We should be on par with Endeavour honestly for all that we do. |
Originally Posted by MD-11Loader
(Post 2844901)
Our pay isn’t the same as PSA though. I assume you know that, correct? PSA is on a blended rare, we are on two scales for captains, which means over 60% of your captains make significantly less than the rest of them. The union found a way to mitigate that disparity which would have left the B scale pilots underpaid. I applaud them for that. I don’t just want a raise. I want a raise that puts my total compensation on par with or better than PSA. Anything else is unacceptable.
|
#WeWantTheAIP
|
Originally Posted by blackbox348
(Post 2845133)
#WeWantTheAIP
|
Originally Posted by BigZ
(Post 2845143)
#WeWantTheAIP+2
|
Originally Posted by Voski
(Post 2845148)
#WeWantTheAIP+3
|
Originally Posted by Voski
(Post 2845148)
#WeWantTheAIP+3
#WeWantTheAIP+5 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Inclined plane
(Post 2845165)
#WeWantTheAIP+5
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by BigZ
(Post 2845168)
Let's just fast forward to #GroupII-1
|
Bump
👆... |
LOWEST PAID and Firing pilots!! :mad::(
|
FOR THOSE STILL KEEPING TRACK
Monday will be: 1. Our 7th paycheck at significantly lower rates than PSA. 2. 103/105 days since the PSA raise announcement/back pay date. 3. 38/61 days since the Piedmont raise announcement/back pay date. 4. 30 days since Envoy backed out of the AIP. 5. The company will have saved (very conservatively) over $9 million by this time. (Average $13/hr raise) x (40 hours credit average per pay period) x (7 pay periods) x (2500 pilots) 6. There probably will still be 20-25 new hires come Monday as well. |
Originally Posted by MEGAFUPM
(Post 2850362)
FOR THOSE STILL KEEPING TRACK
Monday will be: 1. Our 7th paycheck at significantly lower rates than PSA. 2. 103/105 days since the PSA raise announcement/back pay date. 3. 38/61 days since the Piedmont raise announcement/back pay date. 4. 30 days since Envoy backed out of the AIP. 5. The company will have saved (very conservatively) over $9 million by this time. (Average $13/hr raise) x (40 hours credit average per pay period) x (7 pay periods) x (2500 pilots) 6. There probably will still be 20-25 new hires come Monday as well. |
Originally Posted by havick206
(Post 2850514)
How many days since EDV pay raise?
|
You can ***** all you want, as long as Envoy is filling classes (spoiler ALERT - they still do) Management sees no reason for raises, short and simple ...
|
Originally Posted by LowvalueFO
(Post 2850529)
You can ***** all you want, as long as Envoy is filling classes (spoiler ALERT - they still do) Management sees no reason for raises, short and simple ...
|
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2850741)
DUI’s? Multiple checkride failures? Don’t know jack about IFR? Come to Envoy and flow to AA. We’re the new Mesa.
Raises must happen to attract quality applicants. #ENVOYtheMESAofAAGwhollyowneds |
Failure rate
Anybody know the failure rate on new hires? I would think the union should have access to that information. Someone said the reason the DEC program was shut down was high failure rate. I know first hand of several OTS hires that didn’t make it through training. But just because of the company’s spite for pilots, they would probably waste more money on training than pay for a quality product. They have certainly shown this to be the case with all that were forced to upgrade into the CRJ or 145 only to turn right around for another upgrade to what they wanted, or in at least one case, CRJ, then 145 and finally 175. I personally know of at least one that went 175-145-175 and another that was DEC and has gone 145-175 and is scheduled to go back to the 145. Not sure if he put a bid in to go back to the 175 on this bid or not.
Bottom line is the company could have avoided a lot of training waste and lost productivity but didn’t want to talk to the union because they knew there were things they would have to change that would benefit the pilots to change what would avoid the training churn. They can also get better quality applicants and fewer failure with raises that would allow them to be more selective. |
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 2850765)
Anybody know the failure rate on new hires? I would think the union should have access to that information. Someone said the reason the DEC program was shut down was high failure rate. I know first hand of several OTS hires that didn’t make it through training. But just because of the company’s spite for pilots, they would probably waste more money on training than pay for a quality product. They have certainly shown this to be the case with all that were forced to upgrade into the CRJ or 145 only to turn right around for another upgrade to what they wanted, or in at least one case, CRJ, then 145 and finally 175. I personally know of at least one that went 175-145-175 and another that was DEC and has gone 145-175 and is scheduled to go back to the 145. Not sure if he put a bid in to go back to the 175 on this bid or not.
Bottom line is the company could have avoided a lot of training waste and lost productivity but didn’t want to talk to the union because they knew there were things they would have to change that would benefit the pilots to change what would avoid the training churn. They can also get better quality applicants and fewer failure with raises that would allow them to be more selective. |
Originally Posted by LowvalueFO
(Post 2850805)
You can bet your tushi that they have run the numbers - just speaking from former employment it was a common practice and still was cheaper than paying higher wages across the board - so again, decent class sizes - no raises at all ... get used to it and bend over ... =) ... as the Union will absolutely not ruffle any feathers as pointed out many times before for various reasons.
They know what they are doing. I'm convinced you're new. |
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2850835)
A lot of current union members have been dealing with this mafia management team for better part of 2 decades.
They know what they are doing. I'm convinced you're new. |
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2850835)
A lot of current union members have been dealing with this mafia management team for better part of 2 decades.
They know what they are doing. I'm convinced you're new. Yeah I did not think so ... That 2 decades have done ****, they still get played just fine by management ... |
Originally Posted by LowvalueFO
(Post 2850948)
Are you serious now ??? ... I am sure you are joking ... but hey how is that pay raise coming for ya? - or how about the new reserve rules?
Yeah I did not think so ... That 2 decades have done ****, they still get played just fine by management ... You posting the same thing over and over again doesn't change my mind. |
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2850958)
I'm fine without a pay raise. I'd rather have what the union negotiated and what the company initially agreed to.
You posting the same thing over and over again doesn't change my mind. Filler |
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2850958)
I'm fine without a pay raise. I'd rather have what the union negotiated and what the company initially agreed to.
You posting the same thing over and over again doesn't change my mind. |
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2850958)
I'm fine without a pay raise. I'd rather have what the union negotiated and what the company initially agreed to.
You posting the same thing over and over again doesn't change my mind. I’m fine without a pay raise. Really? No pay raise? I'd rather have what the union negotiated and what the company initially agreed to. While we don’t know the details, pretty sure the AIP included at least something close to pay parity. That’s what everyone has said they want. Pay increase with out concessions. |
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 2851020)
Wait. You said two different things.
I’m fine without a pay raise. Really? No pay raise? I'd rather have what the union negotiated and what the company initially agreed to. While we don’t know the details, pretty sure the AIP included at least something close to pay parity. That’s what everyone has said they want. Pay increase with not concessions. |
Originally Posted by Cyio
(Post 2851033)
Yeah I have to agree. I haven’t been able to follow the logic of their posts.
|
Originally Posted by BigZ
(Post 2851083)
What he meant was we aren't twisting our panties in a knot for A pay raise right MEOW. We want good and proper AIP or better.
|
Endeavor is growing this fall, adding 60 pilots per month. That will put pressure on our recruiting (and everyone else).
|
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2851103)
Endeavor is growing this fall, adding 60 pilots per month. That will put pressure on our recruiting (and everyone else).
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:46 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands