Pay raises... not such a good deal.
07-24-2019, 08:29 PM
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Originally Posted by slantgolf
I’m just going off what envoy published: up to 15% pay raises for captains. I hope its better. But idk why envoy would publish less than they could. If the pay raise for captains was going to be 20%, you know they’d brag about it like it was god’s gift to regional flying.
And 0.1% is still “up to” 15%. Prepare to be underwhelmed.
07-24-2019, 08:35 PM
#22
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 46
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
You’re right. If even one pilot is eligible for 15.1%, Envoy would claim it.
And 0.1% is still “up to” 15%. Prepare to be underwhelmed.
And 0.1% is still “up to” 15%. Prepare to be underwhelmed.
07-25-2019, 03:02 AM
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Pawn
Posts: 1,138
Originally Posted by Varsity
I would say with almost certainty Captains got screwed.
We got Piedmont pay rates. Fly a 175, the largest and heaviest RJ out there, for ERJ140 rates.
This is so far from the AIP, I almost don't believe it.
We got Piedmont pay rates. Fly a 175, the largest and heaviest RJ out there, for ERJ140 rates.
This is so far from the AIP, I almost don't believe it.
The AIP still would have paid you the B scale with the small RJ rates. How do people not understand this? What helped make up the difference in the money that you wouldn’t make compared to PSA was the sick bank payout.
Last edited by MD-11Loader; 07-25-2019 at 03:27 AM.
07-25-2019, 03:10 AM
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 1,609
Originally Posted by Varsity
I would say with almost certainty Captains got screwed.
We got Piedmont pay rates. Fly a 175, the largest and heaviest RJ out there, for ERJ140 rates.
This is so far from the AIP, I almost don't believe it.
We got Piedmont pay rates. Fly a 175, the largest and heaviest RJ out there, for ERJ140 rates.
This is so far from the AIP, I almost don't believe it.
If pay banding wasn’t here and people got paid based on equipment, then you would still be paid the 145 rate BECAUSE YOU WOULDNT FLY THE 175!!!!!!!!!!!!
In your world you would be paid PDT rates and fly soon to be PDT airplanes.
07-25-2019, 04:13 AM
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 344
Originally Posted by Pedro4President
If pay banding wasn’t here and people got paid based on equipment, then you would still be paid the 145 rate BECAUSE YOU WOULDNT FLY THE 175!!!!!!!!!!!!
In your world you would be paid PDT rates and fly soon to be PDT airplanes.
In your world you would be paid PDT rates and fly soon to be PDT airplanes.
07-25-2019, 01:45 PM
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 217
“First officer pay over $50 an hour!”
Yeah, by 0.4%
This place was so good way back when I started. In the RW/PF era, this company has become an amazing marketing company selling crap pay for mini mainline jets.
Just saw Pedro was awarded Most Admired CEO of North Texas.
Yeah, by 0.4%
This place was so good way back when I started. In the RW/PF era, this company has become an amazing marketing company selling crap pay for mini mainline jets.
Just saw Pedro was awarded Most Admired CEO of North Texas.
07-25-2019, 01:48 PM
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 217
“Pedro consistently cons veterans and college kids into unscrupulous employment agreements that undermine the value of quality pilots all while driving profit margins higher and higher.”
That should be the opening salvo
That should be the opening salvo
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
