Negotiating Committee
11-22-2019, 06:16 PM
#12
Line Holder
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Posts: 39
Originally Posted by dera
Having a lifer could be a good thing. The company cannot use flow as blackmail on getting things done.
"Forget the AIP, this is what we will give you. And you will sign, if you want to flow".
"Forget the AIP, this is what we will give you. And you will sign, if you want to flow".
11-22-2019, 06:36 PM
#14
Porco Rosso
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,522
Originally Posted by dera
Having a lifer could be a good thing. The company cannot use flow as blackmail on getting things done.
"Forget the AIP, this is what we will give you. And you will sign, if you want to flow".
"Forget the AIP, this is what we will give you. And you will sign, if you want to flow".
You want someone who won't flow negotiating for you, because all the other folks who negotiated for you sold y'all down the river for their own flow's sake.
11-22-2019, 07:13 PM
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,465
Man...
I can not believe I'm making a post in agreement with Dera.
I've always thought the guys that intend on staying here are the guys best suited for representing us. Give it a little thought, more than the surface "he's not like me" kinda thought, and I think you'll agree.
I can not believe I'm making a post in agreement with Dera.
I've always thought the guys that intend on staying here are the guys best suited for representing us. Give it a little thought, more than the surface "he's not like me" kinda thought, and I think you'll agree.
11-23-2019, 09:21 AM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
Sorry, but whether or not what you say is factual, you lose credibility with creating a new username to say it.
I have pretty good information that there are at least a few new members on the negotiating committee that want to work for some QOL improvements.
I want to see some changes in both QOL and flow, but of course, who knows what will come out of any of this
I have pretty good information that there are at least a few new members on the negotiating committee that want to work for some QOL improvements.
I want to see some changes in both QOL and flow, but of course, who knows what will come out of any of this
Management has just one desire. Keep their costs to an absolute low while while simultaneously keeping pilot morale and expectations even lower.
11-23-2019, 11:45 AM
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Originally Posted by Crimson5
Racist, seriously? While I don’t agree with the post, there was never any mention of race.
Also you dont make it cheaper at regionals just to get your flow because then there is always a cheaper alternative. When and if flow stops it will be to late to fight for things. You will barely keep what you have.
If you keep the regionals as a cheap operation, why would mainline bring flying back to mainline. Please dont mention the hiring for the next 10 years, one big world screw up and that's all out the window. You play the averages, you all are putting all the eggs in one basket.
Last edited by tomgoodman; 11-23-2019 at 12:16 PM. Reason: Deleted racial provocation
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
