Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Envoy Airlines
15% smaller is "the best case scenario" - RW >

15% smaller is "the best case scenario" - RW

Search
Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

15% smaller is "the best case scenario" - RW

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-30-2020, 01:09 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2019
Posts: 486
Default

Originally Posted by Ciceda View Post
Just saying that people accepted lower pay and QOL rules because of Flow, and now flow is no more. Not wishing ill on any pilot group. Just pointing out that all the people who used to give out advice that you absolutely need to go someplace with flow "to have that in your back pocket" was giving out horrible advice. You pick a regional based on location, movement, pay, and QOL. Career progression will come no matter where you work during the good times, you do not need flow.
I agree. Sorry you guys are having a decrease
propellere is offline  
Old 06-30-2020, 01:12 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Swakid8's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,427
Default

Originally Posted by Ciceda View Post
Just saying that people accepted lower pay and QOL rules because of Flow, and now flow is no more. Not wishing ill on any pilot group. Just pointing out that all the people who used to give out advice that you absolutely need to go someplace with flow "to have that in your back pocket" was giving out horrible advice. You pick a regional based on location, movement, pay, and QOL. Career progression will come no matter where you work during the good times, you do not need flow.
You can't just say that flow is a bad deal. Hell, If someone lives in base, one that can argue that their QOL along with the ability to make decent money and having flow in the back pocket just to have options on the table just icing on the cake is overall a better deal. As a commuter, you would be looking either a WO or a non-WO regional that is either Republic (not bad depending where you are located), Skywest (not terrible depending on location), Mesa (Really?), ExpressJet (Really?), CommutAir (Really?) Air Wisconsin (Really?), Compass (shut down Really?), TSA (Shut Down Really), GoJet (doesn't look good but really?) Horizon (Terrible unless you live out west). There are only a handful of Regionals where one will see good pay and good QOL (Endeavor or Republic and I might toss Skywest in this category).

The point I am getting at is like you said, picking a regional based on location, qol, pay, movement all like depends on a person situation but flow can't be ignore when it comes to a choice between Regionals since it did create movement.
Swakid8 is offline  
Old 06-30-2020, 01:14 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2019
Posts: 486
Default

Originally Posted by coodrough568 View Post
What is aggravating is that if Eagle has to shrink due to scope, why won’t AA can Mesa, RAH or SKW. Envoy at full capacity alone could do all of Mesa’s flying and then some.
To accurately answer that question, you need to think like a business and not like a pilot. At the end of the day, it all comes down to profit. Mesa pays their pilots a lot less, and trust me I know first hand. It’s just business. Get somewhere you can get hours quickly and get out. Sitting on reserve just keeps you at a regional longer. Sorry to hear you guys are losing some flying and shrinking. The flying will come back in time. Hope for the best. Let’s work together, not against each other.
propellere is offline  
Old 06-30-2020, 01:44 PM
  #24  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,281
Default

Originally Posted by coodrough568 View Post
What is aggravating is that if Eagle has to shrink due to scope, why won’t AA can Mesa, RAH or SKW. Envoy at full capacity alone could do all of Mesa’s flying and then some.
They can't usually just "can" regionals... they have contracts for a set duration.

What they can do is reduce discretionary flying which is above the regionals contractual min (their "guarantee").

They can also opt not to renew any contracts which happen to expire in the downturn. This is likely for small operators, but less likely for jumbo regionals like SKW/RAH... they know they're going to need them again soon enough.

If they want to badly enough, they can make a deal with a regional to buy them out of their contract early. The cost of that will depend on exposure... if a regional just bought a bunch of new RJ's for a 15 year contract with a majot, buying out of that one will be monumentally expensive... it will be cheaper to just pay them during the downturn.

WO's are actually the easiest to reduce, since they can just do it. No need to do buyout's, or declare BK to get out of contracts.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-30-2020, 01:46 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 128
Default

Originally Posted by Ciceda View Post
Just saying that people accepted lower pay and QOL rules because of Flow, and now flow is no more. Not wishing ill on any pilot group. Just pointing out that all the people who used to give out advice that you absolutely need to go someplace with flow "to have that in your back pocket" was giving out horrible advice. You pick a regional based on location, movement, pay, and QOL. Career progression will come no matter where you work during the good times, you do not need flow.

I actually agree with everything you said, but not quite on the location part. Regionals open and close bases as frequently as celebrity’s change their spouses. I mean look at Compass who started out in the Midwest/East Coast and then finished their final year’s exclusively on the west coast. Don’t uproot your life chasing to live in base. My 2 cents.
BoldPilot is offline  
Old 06-30-2020, 01:50 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,465
Default

Originally Posted by BoldPilot View Post
I actually agree with everything you said, but not quite on the location part. Regionals open and close bases as frequently as celebrity’s change their spouses. I mean look at Compass who started out in the Midwest/East Coast and then finished their final year’s exclusively on the west coast. Don’t uproot your life chasing to live in base. My 2 cents.
You should probably favor those close to where you live when you're starting though. By the time your flavor of base closes, you probably have enough seniority to make commuting much more tolerable than it would have been commuting from the bottom of the list. But I agree, don't chase the base for a regional.
highfarfast is offline  
Old 06-30-2020, 02:04 PM
  #27  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 94
Default

Originally Posted by Freighthotdog View Post
How is it horrible advice to have flow as a backup plan? You’re at a regional airline, it’s meant to be a stepping stone not a long term flying job.
This is a myopic view. It’s a job, a job is a job. To say it’s a stepping stone is like saying any other “less-paying” job isn’t an actual “job.” Tell that to any customer service employee...

Who’s going to be on their deathbed and say, “man, I wish I would have made it to a major”?
jtsastre is offline  
Old 06-30-2020, 02:10 PM
  #28  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 94
Default

Originally Posted by Lex11incheSteel View Post
Us AAG WO's need to pressure ALPA to stop giving SkyWest (a non-union entity) flying and bring all Eagle flying back to AAG WO's!
The horror!
jtsastre is offline  
Old 06-30-2020, 02:52 PM
  #29  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Position: Airbus Driver
Posts: 46
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin View Post
I am pretty sure that the main reason for shrink is that AA mainline pilots are a hard no on even temporary scope relief. Scope is going to cause the AA Regional fleet to shrink.

As it should be.
AB321Driver is offline  
Old 06-30-2020, 02:55 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,107
Default

Originally Posted by coodrough568 View Post
What is aggravating is that if Eagle has to shrink due to scope, why won’t AA can Mesa, RAH or SKW. Envoy at full capacity alone could do all of Mesa’s flying and then some.


You can’t just terminate legally binding contracts without paying a penalty. They pulled force majeure with CPZ,but that was for a small amount of planes and right at the beginning of the Rona stuff


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Av8rPHX is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
208pilot
The Boneyard
2
08-24-2015 06:45 AM
GW258
Mergers and Acquisitions
270
09-30-2012 07:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices