Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Envoy Airlines
Envoy 2022: The Flow of Charlie Bucket >

Envoy 2022: The Flow of Charlie Bucket

Search
Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

Envoy 2022: The Flow of Charlie Bucket

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-06-2022, 11:56 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Default

Originally Posted by duck of death View Post
Am I missing something? If you took the bonus you have that money in the bank. If you wait until your flow to mainline, you get an additional 70 K plus the 50 K annual bonus. If you go straight to AA outside of the flow, they’re paying you 70 K anyways but not 50 K in retention bonus. How is AA saving money by not hiring you outside the flow? If you didn’t take the bonus they’re not gonna pay you a signing bonus anyway.

For what it’s worth I’m hearing now of more and more pilots getting CJO’s that aren’t anywhere near flow. Either the dam is about to break or more of us are starting to figure out the magic formula.
Either way you leave Envoy, you have to be replaced. If you get hired elsewhere then AAG doesn’t have to pay you either. If you stay to flow then Envoy gets you for longer.

The $2K a month up to $50K is a drop in the bucket compared to the other $100K (30+70) of that equation, especially if hired outside of flow. AAG didn’t come up with the idea of a RETENTION bonus to hire you early.

While you may have that first $30K in the bank, if you leave you have to pay it back.
pitchattitude is offline  
Old 01-06-2022, 11:58 AM
  #12  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 70
Default

Are you artistic? Anyone who took the retention bonus would have to pay it back unless they flow. So if they leave before flow, they just saved 30k right there.
When you flow, envoy gives you 70k on your last paycheck. If you leave before your flow, they don’t have to pay that. So they saved another 70k.
The other 50k is split over two years and is only paid out if you worked a certain amount of hours per year. So if you leave, you wouldn’t be eligible.

So if AA hired a future flow then they’d miss out on saving all that money. Or they can refuse to hire future flows and hire anyone else and not have to pay out.
fatman is offline  
Old 01-06-2022, 04:52 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BigZ's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,055
Default

That's a great theory, but take a step back and think about it for a minute or two.
...
...
...
Let's not hire eagle people to save 100k and have the competition snag them. Profit!
Seriously?
BigZ is offline  
Old 01-06-2022, 05:44 PM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2020
Position: Gear Slinger
Posts: 48
Default

Originally Posted by BigZ View Post
That's a great theory, but take a step back and think about it for a minute or two.
...
...
...
Let's not hire eagle people to save 100k and have the competition snag them. Profit!
Seriously?
They’re only losing cheap B scale labor. Meanwhile, thousands of non WO pilots are lined up outside AAG HQ that won’t cost $100k+ on day 1 of training.

The goal of the bonus was to continue to staff the regional for the next 2-3 years. Not so they can pay every WO pilot that gets an offer elsewhere $100k to skip flow.
MidsizeSUV is offline  
Old 01-06-2022, 06:01 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Default

Originally Posted by MidsizeSUV View Post
They’re only losing cheap B scale labor. Meanwhile, thousands of non WO pilots are lined up outside AAG HQ that won’t cost $100k+ on day 1 of training.

The goal of the bonus was to continue to staff the regional for the next 2-3 years. Not so they can pay every WO pilot that gets an offer elsewhere $100k to skip flow.
Yes! That $100-150K was a RETENTION bonus to keep WOs staffed with captains, as was the flow. The flow alone has proved to not be enough but they obviously decided increasing it wasn’t the route they wanted to take.

Union just said next bid is likely to have some forced upgrades so it pretty obvious current “solutions” aren’t working to keep things staffed.

I saw more than a few who bid the 145 knowing it was junior and that they would leave before they got to training so could collect a few months of captains pay on the way out the door. IDK if the LOA providing captain pay as of award date allows Envoy to reduce pay if you give two week notice.
pitchattitude is offline  
Old 01-07-2022, 07:55 AM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 47
Default

Originally Posted by pitchattitude View Post
Yes! That $100-150K was a RETENTION bonus to keep WOs staffed with captains, as was the flow. The flow alone has proved to not be enough but they obviously decided increasing it wasn’t the route they wanted to take.

Union just said next bid is likely to have some forced upgrades so it pretty obvious current “solutions” aren’t working to keep things staffed.

I saw more than a few who bid the 145 knowing it was junior and that they would leave before they got to training so could collect a few months of captains pay on the way out the door. IDK if the LOA providing captain pay as of award date allows Envoy to reduce pay if you give two week notice.
It's definitely way more than a few. They'll need a new vacancy bid
Ddts is offline  
Old 01-07-2022, 08:13 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Default

Originally Posted by Ddts View Post
It's definitely way more than a few. They'll need a new vacancy bid
Even with as many are leaving, they are unlikely to run the next bid early. They will not be through the start of the training cycle for everyone on this bid that stays before the next bid closes. It just means those awarded in April will all be going to training sooner. Whether they are forward thinking enough to make the next bid bigger or do something to try and slow attrition is the big question, but knowing this company, if they do, it won’t happen by the next bid.
pitchattitude is offline  
Old 01-07-2022, 02:09 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cujo665's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Semi-Retired...
Posts: 3,137
Default

We told them Charlie wouldn’t need flow….

we were right again.
Cujo665 is offline  
Old 01-07-2022, 02:21 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Position: Resigned
Posts: 1,547
Default

Burn baby burn. They can keep hiring, displacing, whatever. All our check airmen are getting hired, and ultimately to convert an ass in class into an ass in a seat they need to be able to train them.
NoValueAviator is offline  
Old 01-07-2022, 03:27 PM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 48
Default

Originally Posted by pitchattitude View Post
Union just said next bid is likely to have some forced upgrades so it pretty obvious current “solutions” aren’t working to keep things staffed.
So if you have a seniority higher than many that went to Captain on this bid, is it better to bid next time or just make the compnay force the upgrade? And if being forced is better than bidding, why would anyone bid?
JustAsking is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
68cobra
Envoy Airlines
193
10-31-2022 04:22 PM
Gooselives
Envoy Airlines
117
07-02-2020 10:14 AM
HanSoolu
Envoy Airlines
153
07-15-2019 01:50 PM
GodIsGood
Envoy Airlines
154
09-05-2016 11:52 AM
forgot to bid
Major
485
04-03-2009 07:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices