Search

Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

Envoy should sue ALPA...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-04-2014 | 10:18 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
From: doggy style
Default Envoy should sue ALPA...

No joke. Could you imagine any other industry where the union undercuts ITSELF to award work to another group of people under its own umbrella? Talk about a solid case for mis-representation. ALPA did not represent Eagle's best interests when they negotiated the PSA contract. I bet it could be argued they knew this would be the end result.
Reply
Old 09-04-2014 | 11:25 PM
  #2  
deltajuliet's Avatar
Living the Dream
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Default

They'd certainly have a case.

I wonder if a regional-only union would improve things. There might still be the potential for undercutting, but it stands to reason that it would be less likely without the influence of the majors.
Reply
Old 09-04-2014 | 11:31 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 0
Wink

Originally Posted by deltajuliet
They'd certainly have a case.

I wonder if a regional-only union would improve things. There might still be the potential for undercutting, but it stands to reason that it would be less likely without the influence of the majors.




The "potential for undercutting" would be less likely if Hulas and JO couldn't staff their undercutting operations, and the recent concessions at Brownstreak weren't voted in to begin with...
Reply
Old 09-04-2014 | 11:43 PM
  #4  
deltajuliet's Avatar
Living the Dream
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Default

Thank you for your contribution to the thread; unfortunately it's not the topic of discussion.
Reply
Old 09-05-2014 | 12:50 AM
  #5  
OnCenterline's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by bored
Not that it's right... but this same scenario has already played out under all the other legacy carrier umbrellas with their respective regionals. Envoy is unfortunately coming to the same party everyone else has been at for years. Sadly, the awful precedence has already been set, which would render a lawsuit futile.
^^^^^This.
Reply
Old 09-05-2014 | 01:15 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by OnCenterline
^^^^^This.
Exactly. Add to it that national signed off on two TAs in such AAG explicitly told you the terms they demand. Uncertain where you think ALPA is liable.
Reply
Old 09-05-2014 | 01:57 AM
  #7  
JoeMerchant's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
From: CRJ200 Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by DENpilot
No joke. Could you imagine any other industry where the union undercuts ITSELF to award work to another group of people under its own umbrella? Talk about a solid case for mis-representation. ALPA did not represent Eagle's best interests when they negotiated the PSA contract. I bet it could be argued they knew this would be the end result.
...says the former XJT pilot who just left XJT for Mesa in search of a quick upgrade.
Reply
Old 09-05-2014 | 02:53 AM
  #8  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,887
Likes: 122
Default

Originally Posted by deltajuliet
They'd certainly have a case.
No...they would not.

The bar for DFR is very, very high.

Folks often confuse ALPA National with ALPA *Local*...Locals like EGL and PSA, where individual pilots within that Local both negotiate their own CBAs (with assistance from National) and ratify or reject those CBAs.

EGL pilots *knew* contraction and even shutdown was a possibility when they rejected their TA. Having the hindsight of what happened to Comair, they rolled the dice and took their chances.

It sucks, but one cannot logically blame ALPA National for this without first and primarily casting "blame" where it truly belongs - the Local level.
Reply
Old 09-05-2014 | 03:33 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
No...they would not.

The bar for DFR is very, very high.

Folks often confuse ALPA National with ALPA *Local*...Locals like EGL and PSA, where individual pilots within that Local both negotiate their own CBAs (with assistance from National) and ratify or reject those CBAs.

EGL pilots *knew* contraction and even shutdown was a possibility when they rejected their TA. Having the hindsight of what happened to Comair, they rolled the dice and took their chances.

It sucks, but one cannot logically blame ALPA National for this without first and primarily casting "blame" where it truly belongs - the Local level.
Sure, but I'm pretty sure Moak's signature is required on these contracts. National endorses them. Hell, Moak was at the table for our BK contract at Endeavor. National could squash these contracts, but they don't. Shifting planes and destroying jobs is an abomination of union representation.
Reply
Old 09-05-2014 | 03:44 AM
  #10  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Paid2fly
The "potential for undercutting" would be less likely if Hulas and JO couldn't staff their undercutting operations, and the recent concessions at Brownstreak weren't voted in to begin with...
But they can.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TheManager
Major
9584
07-28-2015 12:15 PM
heykerrdog
Union Talk
16
10-27-2014 05:58 PM
CRJAV8OR
Major
36
03-27-2012 11:06 AM
PEACH
Union Talk
8
03-30-2010 08:40 AM
CE750
Major
103
03-29-2008 05:32 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices