![]() |
Originally Posted by Rmk1991
(Post 1937736)
Why did she say TSA and Mesa are god awful??
|
Originally Posted by Rmk1991
(Post 1937736)
Why did she say TSA and Mesa are god awful??
|
Originally Posted by sublime259
(Post 1937956)
Um, because they are???
|
Yea if you guys want to use real information from accurate sources then here is the scoop. For the month of June Envoy had a CF of 94.98%, Mesa had 94.67 and TSA had a 94.25% completion factor. As far as "on time percentage" Envoy was on time 73.90%, Mesa 69.68%, and TSA was on time 60.29%.
So speaking for the Mesa vs Envoy debate looks like the Envoy guys really have nothing to boast about with only a CF of 0.31% better and a on time percentage of only 4.22% better. So explain to me how TSA and Mesa are just "god awful" and Envoy is the shimmering beacon of light in performance again? http://www.flightstats.com/go/Stats/...anceReports.do |
Originally Posted by BE24pilot
(Post 1937952)
Do you have a minuet marker form the recording. I missed this part when I listened the first time.
If not a "minuet", would a waltz be okay? |
Well from a strictly personal experience, I was scheduled to DH on TSA one day out of LGA and literally every single outbound flight that TSA had that day was cancelled. The departure board tends to show TSA cancellations rather frequently as well. As for Mesa, anytime I fly through DFW I witness the carnage of an endless string of angry passengers first-hand.
So no, my opinion isn't from crew room gossip. The performance that I've witnessed for AAG has been horrendous. |
Originally Posted by ScottyDo
(Post 1938006)
Yea if you guys want to use real information from accurate sources then here is the scoop. For the month of June Envoy had a CF of 94.98%, Mesa had 94.67 and TSA had a 94.25% completion factor. As far as "on time percentage" Envoy was on time 73.90%, Mesa 69.68%, and TSA was on time 60.29%.
So speaking for the Mesa vs Envoy debate looks like the Envoy guys really have nothing to boast about with only a CF of 0.31% better and a on time percentage of only 4.22% better. So explain to me how TSA and Mesa are just "god awful" and Envoy is the shimmering beacon of light in performance again? Airline Performance Reports |
Originally Posted by ScottyDo
(Post 1938006)
Yea if you guys want to use real information from accurate sources then here is the scoop. For the month of June Envoy had a CF of 94.98%, Mesa had 94.67 and TSA had a 94.25% completion factor. As far as "on time percentage" Envoy was on time 73.90%, Mesa 69.68%, and TSA was on time 60.29%.
So speaking for the Mesa vs Envoy debate looks like the Envoy guys really have nothing to boast about with only a CF of 0.31% better and a on time percentage of only 4.22% better. So explain to me how TSA and Mesa are just "god awful" and Envoy is the shimmering beacon of light in performance again? Airline Performance Reports The sad part is that a certain major airline is willing to let performance suffer in order to perpetuate the whipsaw by taking planes away from a certain regional and giving the planes to worse performing regionals. Quality doesn't matter as long as it's CHEAP. |
Originally Posted by Blackwing
(Post 1938004)
And your source of information is what exactly? Crew room gossip and internet chat forums?
|
Originally Posted by sublime259
(Post 1938031)
Well from a strictly personal experience, I was scheduled to DH on TSA one day out of LGA and literally every single outbound flight that TSA had that day was cancelled. The departure board tends to show TSA cancellations rather frequently as well. As for Mesa, anytime I fly through DFW I witness the carnage of an endless string of angry passengers first-hand.
So no, my opinion isn't from crew room gossip. The performance that I've witnessed for AAG has been horrendous. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:53 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands