Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 2132073)
Well, by the looks of Envoy's last new hire class, just about anything isn't good for the flow. It doesn't matter WHY they don't come to Envoy, only that they don't......and that's NOT good for you because without the new bottom tiers being constructed in the pyramid below you, those now at or near the bottom STAY on the bottom. Considering Envoy only has a relatively small amount of E-175's and the CRJ's and EMB's are worthless to the few newbie's out there, what's the plan ?
Looks to be a VERY cold New York winter there, I'm sorry to say. Sounds like more and more over on EL are starting to finally get it. Whether it's 38 new hires per month to make the 2.5 year upgrade and/or 38 new hires per month to have the flow work as promised. They aren't getting anywhere close. Look at the thread regarding the withholding of FO's from their Captain upgrades. The Envoy ALPA e-mail has a desperate tone to it. Even they have realized that management doesn't fulfill their promises. Only the few here who have their heads buried in the sand continue to cling to the VP of Ops 2.5/5.5 Flow Baby Flow model. |
Originally Posted by ag386
(Post 2132119)
Something these seriously pro-envoy types here seemingly will never get, you must have new hires in at least in numbers that are close to the amount of people leaving for retirement, attrition, flow, medical or other reasons.
Whether it's 38 new hires per month to make the 2.5 year upgrade and/or 38 new hires per month to have the flow work as promised. They aren't getting anywhere close. Look at the thread regarding the withholding of FO's from their Captain upgrades. The Envoy ALPA e-mail has a desperate tone to it. Even they have realized that management doesn't fulfill their promises. Only the few here who have their heads buried in the sand continue to cling to the VP of Ops 2.5/5.5 Flow Baby Flow model. Here's a quick story for you...I have a friend that went to Atlas about 2 years ago. He texted me last week saying he was on an American Eagle aircraft operated by TSA and said "when the hell did that happen?" Mind you, he spent about 7 years here. Moral of the story? He moved on to bigger and better things and never looked back. He couldn't care less about this place, nor should he. Why? Because he has a life and he doesn't work here anymore! |
Originally Posted by Eaglepilot84
(Post 2132121)
We get it. Envoy f'd you and you're butt hurt. How come you don't post in the Allegiant threads? It's a serious question.
Here's a quick story for you...I have a friend that went to Atlas about 2 years ago. He texted me last week saying he was on an American Eagle aircraft operated by TSA and said "when the hell did that happen?" Mind you, he spent about 7 years here. Moral of the story? He moved on to bigger and better things and never looked back. He couldn't care less about this place, nor should he. Why? Because he has a life and he doesn't work here anymore! It's a serious question. If you're going to preach that mantra or criticize others for it, you shouldn't violate it yourself. :cool: |
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 2132136)
Why then do you post on threads of airlines YOU don't work for ?
It's a serious question. If you're going to preach that mantra or criticize others for it, you shouldn't violate it yourself. :cool: |
Originally Posted by Eaglepilot84
(Post 2132137)
Relax Francis, I just like f'ing with you because you're such a lunatic. So forgive me for posting on an AA thread once.
I understand though. Considering your increasingly precarious situation at Envoy, "f'ing" with me must be one of the few ways you have left to get off, so again..... .....your welcome. ;) |
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 2132168)
Lunatic ? That slur was already used against me today...
|
Poor eaglyfly. "Everyone's attacking me" in 3....2.....1.....
|
Originally Posted by FlameNSky
(Post 2132204)
Ever stop to think that maybe everybody is right?
|
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 2132234)
Nope. A few bad apples don't represent the entire orchard. ;)
|
If Envoy withheld 5 from flowing earlier this year and they are withholding 12 FO's from their upgrade to make it through the summer, what makes anyone think that they would never withhold from the flow in the future to continue to operate their schedule?
They have a reprieve this summer as the furloughees return. As I've said before, late this fall as the overall pilot group shrinks to the maximum point that Envoy can accept and still operate it's schedule, you will see withholding of the flow beyond just the metered amounts. The entire regional industry is in slow motion collapse and Envoy managers still can't see the light of the oncoming train. |
Originally Posted by ag386
(Post 2132315)
If Envoy withheld 5 from flowing earlier this year and they are withholding 12 FO's from their upgrade to make it through the summer, what makes anyone think that they would never withhold from the flow in the future to continue to operate their schedule?
They have a reprieve this summer as the furloughees return. As I've said before, late this fall as the overall pilot group shrinks to the maximum point that Envoy can accept and still operate it's schedule, you will see withholding of the flow beyond just the metered amounts. The entire regional industry is in slow motion collapse and Envoy managers still can't see the light of the oncoming train. Guess what? We are still flowing. The flow is working as intended. Get over it! |
Originally Posted by cr700
(Post 2132333)
It is beyond stupidity as to why you keep posting when you don't even work here. I'm curious as to how you even got an ATP with the mental deficiencies you exhibit.
Guess what? We are still flowing. The flow is working as intended. Get over it! |
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 2132335)
Except the flow isn't working as intended. And why does it matter who posts where? As near as I can tell, pilots from a bunch of different airlines post in different threads. So why would you care who posts in the Envoy thread?
As for the flow, technically they are flowing the minimum required, but when the Letter T situation is resolved, then it should get interesting as even with the flow spigot nothing more then a drip for months and possibly the remainder of the year, Envoy will almost certainly have fewer pilots at the end of the year then they do now. Although the busy Summer flying season will be over, the holiday season will be upon us and that should be ugly considering I think most of the E-175 slots will be filled and no one wants to fly the right seat of Envoy's CRJ's or EMB's. By next Summer when Enviy is still smaller then later this year a rinse and repeat of now only on steroids is a real possibility and might be the hull-blown crisis management here has kicked the can to with no can then left to kick. Something simply has gotta give within 12 months and that may or may not be a place a junior Envoy pilot (all F/O's) will want to find themselves in. That just the way I see it, anyway. |
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 2132357)
Because when you have no valid opposing argument, irrelevancy is one of the few places left to run. That and name calling and personal attack. Some are convinced they make legitimate substitutes for proper rebuttal and it works for them.
As for the flow, technically they are flowing the minimum required, but when the Letter T situation is resolved, then it should get interesting as even with the flow spigot nothing more then a drip for months and possibly the remainder of the year, Envoy will almost certainly have fewer pilots at the end of the year then they do now. Although the busy Summer flying season will be over, the holiday season will be upon us and that should be ugly considering I think most of the E-175 slots will be filled and no one wants to fly the right seat of Envoy's CRJ's or EMB's. By next Summer when Enviy is still smaller then later this year a rinse and repeat of now only on steroids is a real possibility and might be the hull-blown crisis management here has kicked the can to with no can then left to kick. Something simply has gotta give within 12 months and that may or may not be a place a junior Envoy pilot (all F/O's) will want to find themselves in. That just the way I see it, anyway. Why are you so hung up on a place you don't even work? Are you just upset that you had to wait many years to flow while Envoy will have young guys flowing while spending less than 1/2 of the time you spent there? |
Originally Posted by cr700
(Post 2132333)
It is beyond stupidity as to why you keep posting when you don't even work here. I'm curious as to how you even got an ATP with the mental deficiencies you exhibit.
Guess what? We are still flowing. The flow is working as intended. Get over it! I bet you are in the office right now boasting "yeah I post something on APC every(workday) to keep those liars(truthsayers) in check!" (head shrug) |
No new selections have been made. No announcements regarding how many will flow during the recall process, and technically we should flow zero as these are not new hire classes.
Even if they flow 5-10 people per month during recalls it's still missing the originally advertised flow totals by a mile. Thing is, nobody knows exactly how many are coming back. The manner in which they are calling furloughs prevents calculating solid number. Flow could normalize this summer, or more likely, towards the end of the year. Just add 3-5 months to your projected date. |
Originally Posted by cr700
(Post 2132362)
Your arguments are just baseless facts and a bunch of innuendo. Supposedly you work at AA. If so, and that's a big if, you've achieved the brass ring.
Why are you so hung up on a place you don't even work? Are you just upset that you had to wait many years to flow while Envoy will have young guys flowing while spending less than 1/2 of the time you spent there? If he is at AA, maybe he doesn't think 16 years of waiting for a flow that he was promised would originally work in a max of 3 is "working as advertised". Stop trying to be a snake oil salesman and sell a flow that has very little guarantees to it, hasn't worked right in the past, and you are already stretching the truth as "working as advertised" on anyway. |
Originally Posted by cr700
(Post 2132362)
Your arguments are just baseless facts and a bunch of innuendo. Supposedly you work at AA. If so, and that's a big if, you've achieved the brass ring.
Originally Posted by cr700
(Post 2132632)
Why are you so hung up on a place you don't even work? Are you just upset that you had to wait many years to flow while Envoy will have young guys flowing while spending less than 1/2 of the time you spent there?
Pilots at Envoy are flowing in less than half the time it took me ? Interesting. Well, in the interest of providing factual information, what is the present longevity of the most recent Envoy flows and what will be the longevity of the last 824 flow ? If the answer to either is less then 5.5 years, then yes, your claim is accurate. If not, then it is itself "baseless fact". The future Protected Pilots (actually only the recent new-hires) are only PROJECTED to flow in that time frame, not guaranteed (the more senior ones or about 80% will not). For historical reference, I was contractually projected to flow in 2 years and management then stated to ALL Eagle pilots at that time they'd be at AA in less then 5 years, so my point of the legitimacy of projections and promises (AKA "Cocktails & Dreams") is neither baseless, nor innuendo. Your position of the 5.5 year flow to AA IS innuendo based on the math that is collapsing more every passing day. Even if the PP continues where the 824 leaves off, by late 2017 (at the earliest) those pilots will have what, close to 7-8 years at Envoy which is well over half the time it took me and my points to the present and future Charlie Bucket's is that 5.5/6 years is highly unlikely considering not only the past, but even more ominously, the present. |
Originally Posted by PilotCrusader
(Post 2132368)
Perhaps he can't stand seeing liars like yourself sucker in more unsuspecting new hires with drivel like "The flow is working as advertised!"
If he is at AA, maybe he doesn't think 16 years of waiting for a flow that he was promised would originally work in a max of 3 is "working as advertised". Stop trying to be a snake oil salesman and sell a flow that has very little guarantees to it, hasn't worked right in the past, and you are already stretching the truth as "working as advertised" on anyway. Actually, not much difference in date spans from present pilots from a Eagle/Envoy longevity standpoint. I'll reiterate for the record, I'd be happy NO Envoy pilot (well, perhaps a dozen or so :cool:) wait any longer then necessary to get to AA as virtually all deserve it IMO (exept the aforementioned dozen) and most of them will indeed have a much faster climb up the pole once at AA then I have/will. That's cool as I plan to even help them out by NOT flying to 65 and getting out of their way ASAP. |
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 2131963)
What if it trickles just enough to keep you there, but not get you to AA to fast ? Sure, ALL would go to another legacy and most would go to an LCC, but most aren't geared for corporate, haven't planned on leaving the industry and virtually NONE would make a lateral move to the bottom of another regionals list in this environment.
People might threaten to leave, but when their guard was down and they were more honest (when strategically they shouldn't have been) in what seemed like an innocent EL poll, IIRC about 70% said they are committed to Envoy come what may. Few present captains can duplicate their income outside an RJ captains job and many of the F/O's are in too deep to move anywhere but up to legacy or LCC. I think Envoy knows they've got most pilots by the short-hairs and aren't worried too much with non-expected attrition, especially if the flow DOESN'T stop, but just slows to a more modest 20/month or in a consolidation scenario, the equivalent of that for present Envoy PP's. I don't know if you keep up with the hiring news going on above the regional level, but things are changing quickly. Most of the bottom tier LCC jobs are pretty easy to attain, it just takes a little groundwork. Corporate jobs are opening up all over as corporate pilots shuffle into the regionals to try and get 121 time on their resume for the legacies. Overseas jobs are there and attainable if a pilot is so inclined. And the legacies are not slowing down. For most FO's that are staying, their top choice is AA. They aren't going to hustle for a job at Frontier or head overseas to Emirates to get out of the regional rat race. They are staying here, and watching what happens. Maybe FO's here felt trapped in the past, but I promise you, most that want out now, are getting out. How much will they put up with, should the flow be modified or slowed (outside of the contract)? My guess is, not much. I think we both agree that within the next year something will happen. We can't flow 30/month and hire 10. It's not sustainable. I think they need us. I think they will figure out they need us more than we need them. Same goes for PDT and PSA. Their model is not working and they still need their RJ's flying. |
Well, I think it's time to go back to the job search. I'm not holding out for AA. This management has lost my confidence completely. Even with bonus cash and retention for FOs, I can't imagine them having the desire to save or fix any of our problems. They go for the easy way, and it fails them because the pilots suffer by their actions. It's a shame, I really liked DFW.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
Been trying to apply therefor last 2 years with no callback.
5500TT, 4900ME, 2350PIC, 1650TPIC (part 121 and 135). Clean PRIA, Driving and FAA Current part 135 Types is CL65, CL600, E145, CE500 Never failed anything. Do have G7 on resume |
New Envoy Information
^^^^^^^ Where?
|
Originally Posted by highflyer1980
(Post 2132527)
^^^^^^^ Where?
|
Originally Posted by AdiosMikeFox
(Post 2132366)
No new selections have been made. No announcements regarding how many will flow during the recall process, and technically we should flow zero as these are not new hire classes.
Even if they flow 5-10 people per month during recalls it's still missing the originally advertised flow totals by a mile. Thing is, nobody knows exactly how many are coming back. The manner in which they are calling furloughs prevents calculating solid number. Flow could normalize this summer, or more likely, towards the end of the year. Just add 3-5 months to your projected date. We are going to be flowing 12-15 pilots per month to the LUS side as the furloughs return to the LAA side. It is apparent that they will likely be contacting people at the last minute to fill those flow slots. |
I know they're not getting many out of each batch, but no guarantees that it will remain consistent.
Source? I've heard no numbers yet but it was rumored to be 5-10 per class. I believe that yes, it will be the LUS bases due to the AA furloughs being required to go back to AA equipment. |
I will be interviewing in the coming weeks and was just advised that the sim portion has been removed from the interview process.
|
Originally Posted by Mistek89
(Post 2132703)
I will be interviewing in the coming weeks and was just advised that the sim portion has been removed from the interview process.
|
Originally Posted by Shiner
(Post 2132431)
I don't know if you keep up with the hiring news going on above the regional level, but things are changing quickly. Most of the bottom tier LCC jobs are pretty easy to attain, it just takes a little groundwork. Corporate jobs are opening up all over as corporate pilots shuffle into the regionals to try and get 121 time on their resume for the legacies. Overseas jobs are there and attainable if a pilot is so inclined. And the legacies are not slowing down.
For most FO's that are staying, their top choice is AA. They aren't going to hustle for a job at Frontier or head overseas to Emirates to get out of the regional rat race. They are staying here, and watching what happens. Maybe FO's here felt trapped in the past, but I promise you, most that want out now, are getting out. How much will they put up with, should the flow be modified or slowed (outside of the contract)? My guess is, not much. I think we both agree that within the next year something will happen. We can't flow 30/month and hire 10. It's not sustainable. I think they need us. I think they will figure out they need us more than we need them. Same goes for PDT and PSA. Their model is not working and they still need their RJ's flying. Yes, they need you, but even if they increase pay, you're still in an RJ and not building AA seniority and that doesn't bring in newbies, nor prevent people from bailing to the likes of Jet a Blue or Spirit, let alone Delta or United, both of which are slated to have very robust hiring schedules over the next few years. Putting you on the AA list, even a staple will require APA and AA pilot approval and Parker just blew another loogie in the BOD's face and thus AA pilots, so there will be NO interest in bailing him out of his RJ addiction without serious contractual modifications akin to parity with Delta and I don't see any chance at least for now of that until 2020 or beyond. AFAIC, the farce of the culture change that did happen just in the WRONG direction means most here would prefer to fold their arms and watch Rome burn in regards to his regional conundrum even at the expense of contraction at mainline. Parker bombed in his chance to demonstrate an ethical compass and will receive no consideration from the mainline pilot group unless either he pony's up a Delta package or the APA BOD settles for scraps and passes that to the pilots who might then repeat history and run for .15 on the dollar again. |
Originally Posted by DilsonWic
(Post 2132528)
Dude. Its APC. A place full of BS and name calling. What'd ya expect?
Just asking because it wasn't specific has to what airline that was referenced. But if you think the troll card should be played. Okay. |
Originally Posted by AdiosMikeFox
(Post 2132613)
I know they're not getting many out of each batch, but no guarantees that it will remain consistent.
Source? I've heard no numbers yet but it was rumored to be 5-10 per class. I believe that yes, it will be the LUS bases due to the AA furloughs being required to go back to AA equipment. |
Thanks. I wonder why nothing official has been released on the matter.
|
New Envoy Information
Fear of mass exodus?
Come to think of it, I believe most have become numb from the bad news airline. |
Originally Posted by cr700
(Post 2132333)
It is beyond stupidity as to why you keep posting when you don't even work here. I'm curious as to how you even got an ATP with the mental deficiencies you exhibit.
Guess what? We are still flowing. The flow is working as intended. Get over it! A Ponzi or Pyramid scheme requires unsuspecting saps that will provide money or a service to keep the facade going. The service is bodies that will fly as FO's and the facade is the flow. The problem is, there very, very few pilots out there to keep the facade going for Envoy and thus the reason that the flow will collapse on itself inside of 12 months. When I say collapse, I mean that the numbers going over will be cut sharply. Envoy may let 8 or 10 a month go only if they can staff what they need to fly. |
Originally Posted by cr700
(Post 2132333)
It is beyond stupidity as to why you keep posting when you don't even work here. I'm curious as to how you even got an ATP with the mental deficiencies you exhibit.
Guess what? We are still flowing. The flow is working as intended. Get over it! |
Originally Posted by ag386
(Post 2132961)
We are so glad to have you back. You gave us loads of good information here as to how this flow is going to continue to work.
A Ponzi or Pyramid scheme requires unsuspecting saps that will provide money or a service to keep the facade going. The service is bodies that will fly as FO's and the facade is the flow. The problem is, there very, very few pilots out there to keep the facade going for Envoy and thus the reason that the flow will collapse on itself inside of 12 months. When I say collapse, I mean that the numbers going over will be cut sharply. Envoy may let 8 or 10 a month go only if they can staff what they need to fly. I'm far from a defender of envoy management. In fact, I think they're kids who don't know *** they're doing. But one thing I'll never do is spew my opinion as fact, like you do. Btw, you never answered my question about your obsession with envoy either! Rumor is that you got "asked to resign" for busting one too many check rides?! Is this true? |
Originally Posted by Buzzlightyear
(Post 2132980)
If you call one new hire last class working then yes, like a charm.
|
Originally Posted by Skyvector
(Post 2133029)
How many in the next class?
|
Originally Posted by PilotJ3
(Post 2133078)
Rumor is around 13-15 with 12 E-175 slots available.
Once we do, we will be able to offer more E175s to new hires and for upgrades. Plus, with an increased training capacity the +90 options come into play..with a few other variables to work out. |
They've already said they're not farming out sim time. How are they going to fix capacity with finite sim availability?
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:24 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands