![]() |
Originally Posted by boiler07
(Post 2029599)
The training center is capable of it so what's your point?
All I hear on that is silence, exept for 205 upgrades next year. Is it me, or have the jackals called in reinforcements from the woods ? Sure seems like it. :cool: |
Originally Posted by boiler07
(Post 2029607)
Yet you overlooked, or were content, with OP misrepresenting the 2.5 year upgrade as being applicable to those hired in 2014 or earlier.
You accuse others of only choosing the facts that support their agenda, and I hope you realize you're doing the same. Whether the employees believe management to be untrustworthy or not, doesn't effect the fact that what they are saying about the upgrade IS possible. |
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 2029610)
An unsubstantiated claim. Besides, even if it was, they'd have to run twice that many through to include new-hires (that almost certainly are not likely to exist every month in the future). That's perhaps 1500 long-term training events over that 18 months and the bubble alone would likely cripple Envoy to mimic where RAH is now. If what is you say is true, then management should have no trouble confirming their intentions to match your claim of their capabilites.
All I hear on that is silence, exept for 205 upgrades next year. Is it me, or have the jackals called in reinforcements from the woods ? Sure seems like it. :cool: |
Originally Posted by boiler07
(Post 2029608)
Uh oh, it's those pesky facts again. Guess he should have checked the seniority list before making stuff up.
This ag386 character most likely does NOT work at Envoy and created his profile with the specific intention to carpet bomb. My guess it's one of the usual anti-Envoy posters with an alter ego. Maybe a certain current Spirit pilot. Or one of the PSA funny guys. Next time he should leave out specific-false-details if he wants to pretend to be somebody else. Oops!! |
Originally Posted by boiler07
(Post 2029607)
Yet you overlooked, or were content, with OP misrepresenting the 2.5 year upgrade as being applicable to those hired in 2014 or earlier.
You accuse others of only choosing the facts that support their agenda, and I hope you realize you're doing the same. Nothing more than trolls. |
Originally Posted by Skyvector
(Post 2029605)
Are you sure about all that? Because there is only ONE pilot on the seniority list currently who is a May 2013 hire...and he works on Christmas.
Want to try again? |
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 2029614)
Overlooked as that was never part of my assertions. I'm not required to validate every other members posts, but I do realize it makes an attractive diversion when you've run out of rocks.
You would often point out half truths and misrepresentation by some notorious envoy pilots who were in fact stretching the truth. The fact is that you were more than happy to point those out, but every time someone posted something negative about envoy, you would conveniently not apply the same standard to them. This OP is just another example. |
Originally Posted by FlameNSky
(Post 2029548)
Damn it, AMF! I told you to post that after dinner. You were too quick. Now everyone is going to know the super secret conspiracy that eaglefly was so smart to have already figured out, the clandestine branch of the Secret Service charged with ensuring the belief in aliens and envoy's flow. We are doing really well on the aliens thing but we are really dropping the ball on envoy. Darn, eaglefly and his super intelligence.
|
Originally Posted by boiler07
(Post 2029616)
So we're clear, how exactly would management "confirm their intentions"?
If they cannot make a coherent argument for that with specifics, it falls into the "heard that before" catagory of unrealized promises, which BTW is a Loooooooog file. Good luck with that. :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by boiler07
(Post 2029620)
Actually, you commonly represented yourself as a mediator of sorts by only looking at the facts.
You would often point out half truths and misrepresentation by some notorious envoy pilots who were in fact stretching the truth. The fact is that you were more than happy to point those out, but every time someone posted something negative about envoy, you would conveniently not apply the same standard to them. This OP is just another example. Sorry...........wrong guy. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:38 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands