Envoy
05-07-2018 | 11:41 AM
#8261
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
05-07-2018 | 11:46 AM
#8262
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 0
if that f/o was in the low 400's then that f/o knew very well when they voted in the contract during and after B.K., because there was a change in the this specific topic, force upgrade, but guess did not read any part of it.
05-07-2018 | 11:52 AM
#8263
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 12
Doesnt mean he didnt read it. He very well could have voted no for all you know.
05-07-2018 | 02:09 PM
#8267
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
From: middle seat in the back
No but it does indicate they went straight into a CA slot prior to a vacancy bid offering those slots to current FO’s. No one has a problem with street CA’s themselves, just the way the company went about it in violation of the bidding process in the contract. Not to mention RW’s email itself says they were hired as street CA’s not FO’s any arbitrator will also see it the same way.
05-07-2018 | 02:49 PM
#8268
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
What I’m saying is no one has a problem with the street ca’s individually person to person. Of course I know the knock on effect of bonuses and would rather pay rates to increase. But you can’t hate the person for signing on if the situation works for them, it’s not like they crossed a picket line
05-07-2018 | 03:20 PM
#8269
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
05-07-2018 | 03:22 PM
#8270
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
