![]() |
Originally Posted by SkipperBaloo
(Post 2569431)
Or rent a car
This way I got to have a couple glasses of wine in business class, wake up in Paris. Look around. Have a couple glasses of wine in business class, wake up home. |
Got nothing to say about Expressjet one way or another. Just wanted to get that grammatically incorrect broken (or removed) link superseded on the Regional page.
|
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 2577059)
Got nothing to say about Expressjet one way or another. Just wanted to get that grammatically incorrect broken (or removed) link superseded on the Regional page.
|
I’d say morale here is probably at the lowest I’ve seen yet. I came back from 2 months off and it’s really almost to the point where it could be dangerous. Hate to say it because I’m guilty too.
|
Originally Posted by calmwinds
(Post 2577116)
You are the first person to comment on the Xjet forum in 10 days. You can tell a dying regional when no one asks any questions about it, no one complains about it, no one cares about it enough to even make a stupid comment.
|
Originally Posted by DirkDiggler
(Post 2577183)
I’d say morale here is probably at the lowest I’ve seen yet. I came back from 2 months off and it’s really almost to the point where it could be dangerous. Hate to say it because I’m guilty too.
|
Originally Posted by Puck Hawg
(Post 2577452)
That’s a pretty dumb statement. Just because I’m aggravated with the company doesn’t mean I’m going to endanger anyone’s life. If anything, it makes it safer....ya know, flying fuel efficient and making sure you block out ten early, 14 late just to help the company keep up with performance numbers.....
|
I have heard that some employee groups are getting early retirement buyouts....
Is that true? And if so-why? Why would the company want to reduce cost structure if they shut down soon? |
Originally Posted by DirkDiggler
(Post 2577555)
I agree. But it doesn't mean it's not going on. And they say checklist noncompliance is basically at an all time high. When morale is low, pilots tend to drift from standards. Doesn't have to be all in flight. Sloppy uniforms, showing up late, lav overflowing (who cares go anyway), mx things that are overlooked to get to the hotel quicker, the list goes on.
|
Originally Posted by jcountry
(Post 2577669)
I have heard that some employee groups are getting early retirement buyouts....
Is that true? And if so-why? Why would the company want to reduce cost structure if they shut down soon? I too don’t understand this. Guess they aren’t quitting as fast as the pilots. |
Originally Posted by afterburn81
(Post 2577748)
Flight attendants are being offered retirement packages as we speak. I personally know several guys and gals retiring by June 1st. Not sure of other groups though. Haven’t heard.
I too don’t understand this. Guess they aren’t quitting as fast as the pilots. WH would the company care to get rid of ones at the top end? They can furlough for free. I wonder if skyw is looking to sell the certificate or some such-and trying to make the work group which would come with it cheaper. Only explanation I can come up with. |
Perhaps there is a merger in the works, and that work group isn’t coming with it. Just another rumor I’ve heard on the line, but rumors are a dime a dozen and RARELY have truth behind them.
|
Originally Posted by PhantomHawk
(Post 2577813)
Perhaps there is a merger in the works, and that work group isn’t coming with it. Just another rumor I’ve heard on the line, but rumors are a dime a dozen and RARELY have truth behind them.
Early retirements and buyouts aren’t cheap. I know they aren’t doing this pit of the kindness of their hearts. (We’ve seen exactly how kind their hearts are.) |
Originally Posted by afterburn81
(Post 2577748)
Flight attendants are being offered retirement packages as we speak. I personally know several guys and gals retiring by June 1st. Not sure of other groups though. Haven’t heard.
|
Originally Posted by jcountry
(Post 2577669)
I have heard that some employee groups are getting early retirement buyouts....
Is that true? And if so-why? Why would the company want to reduce cost structure if they shut down soon? |
Originally Posted by JuniorFO
(Post 2577914)
Because they aren't shutting down. People who believe XJT is shutting down are completely misinformed.
|
Originally Posted by JuniorFO
(Post 2577914)
Because they aren't shutting down. People who believe XJT is shutting down are completely misinformed.
|
Originally Posted by PhantomHawk
(Post 2577684)
A professional does their job to a certain standard, regardless of their emotional response to how screwed it seems we are. Or.....these people should leave. Compromising safety because you’re butt-hurt about working on the Titanic is really stupid. That path leads to an eventual loss of career or even lives.
|
Originally Posted by afterburn81
(Post 2577748)
Flight attendants are being offered retirement packages as we speak. I personally know several guys and gals retiring by June 1st. Not sure of other groups though. Haven’t heard.
I too don’t understand this. Guess they aren’t quitting as fast as the pilots. |
Supposedly the training department was instructed to create a transition course ERJ -> CRJ. That’s right, that’s not backwards. Heard recently from someone at AQP ground school.....
|
Originally Posted by da42pilot
(Post 2579831)
Supposedly the training department was instructed to create a transition course ERJ -> CRJ. That’s right, that’s not backwards. Heard recently from someone at AQP ground school.....
|
Originally Posted by da42pilot
(Post 2579825)
The flight attendants didn’t get an integrated seniority list with the ERJ side, that’s why.
Furloughs cost $0 |
Originally Posted by da42pilot
(Post 2579831)
Supposedly the training department was instructed to create a transition course ERJ -> CRJ. That’s right, that’s not backwards. Heard recently from someone at AQP ground school.....
|
If the CRJ-700 finds a home somewhere with UAL operations, they have to open the bidding up to the whole list. That’s one possible scenario. I can’t imagine we would waste time training people for an operation that isn’t going to exist in 6 months.
BUT.......it is ExpressJet, so logic has no place in this discussion. My bad. |
Originally Posted by PhantomHawk
(Post 2580049)
If the CRJ-700 finds a home somewhere with UAL operations, they have to open the bidding up to the whole list. That’s one possible scenario. I can’t imagine we would waste time training people for an operation that isn’t going to exist in 6 months.
BUT.......it is ExpressJet, so logic has no place in this discussion. My bad. |
Originally Posted by PhantomHawk
(Post 2580049)
If the CRJ-700 finds a home somewhere with UAL operations, they have to open the bidding up to the whole list. That’s one possible scenario. I can’t imagine we would waste time training people for an operation that isn’t going to exist in 6 months.
BUT.......it is ExpressJet, so logic has no place in this discussion. My bad. |
Terry's update
Originally Posted by Bozo
(Post 2581196)
Actually your statement about open the bid is not correct. There is a fence on the 700. The protection is through approx. Dec 1 2018.
|
Originally Posted by UASCOMPILOT
(Post 2581205)
Those plane will be placed with SKY mark my words and I did cross the t's and dot my i's Terry!
|
Originally Posted by jcountry
(Post 2580028)
I still don’t get it.
Furloughs cost $0 employees? |
Originally Posted by Blackhawk
(Post 2581241)
I don’t think Inc will have the pilots to fly them in addition to the 30+ new airplanes being delivered to them this year.
Plus its not realy a net gain. OO AA 200’s going away. Only half going to UA. |
Originally Posted by UASCOMPILOT
(Post 2581205)
Those plane will be placed with SKY mark my words and I did cross the t's and dot my i's Terry!
|
Originally Posted by msprj2
(Post 2581243)
Does the company have to pay unemployment to those furloughed
employees? I think they pay unemployment taxes (insurance) for everyone through the years, but I don’t think they pay extra if furloughs happen. |
Originally Posted by UASCOMPILOT
(Post 2581205)
Those plane will be placed with SKY mark my words and I did cross the t's and dot my i's Terry!
|
Originally Posted by jcountry
(Post 2581405)
I don’t think so.
I think they pay unemployment taxes (insurance) for everyone through the years, but I don’t think they pay extra if furloughs happen. Didn't they come out and say they will not dispute any unemployment claims? If the company plans to be around for any reasonable amount of time this makes zero business sense. |
Originally Posted by unit monster
(Post 2584264)
They pay a pre determined rate based on successful unemployment claims, the higher the ratio of claims to active employees the higher the unemployment insurance taxes they pay. So no, they don't pay directly, but unemployment taxes will increase.
Didn't they come out and say they will not dispute any unemployment claims? If the company plans to be around for any reasonable amount of time this makes zero business sense. Still hard to figure why they would pay any kind of severance if they just plan to bankrupt or liquidate |
Does anyone have a verifiable person that actually received a severance package? It’s one thing to not dispute unemployment... but with an airline that gives $8 turkey vouchers as a holiday bonus, I am highly doubtful anyone received a severance package. Let’s be realistic here. Names/titles or it didn’t happen.
|
Originally Posted by DirkDiggler
(Post 2585100)
Does anyone have a verifiable person that actually received a severance package? It’s one thing to not dispute unemployment... but with an airline that gives $8 turkey vouchers as a holiday bonus, I am highly doubtful anyone received a severance package. Let’s be realistic here. Names/titles or it didn’t happen.
(I’d consider that a severance package.) |
What do you mean? You could retire whenever you want. Maybe another thing to retain travel benefits as a “retiree.” Penalty free 401k distributions start at 59-1/2. Allowing someone to retire is no big perk. If you’re financially set you can retire tomorrow. I’m talking severance, someone getting a fat check. That’s the only thing that matters and it probably hasn’t happened.
|
FAs are being offered some sort of pittance for early retirement. It’s like 2 months pay or something like that.
|
Federal WARN Act
If a company is conducting a mass layoff they have to give at least 60 days notice to employees affected, unless it's a liquidation or other urgent situation. Also, some states require that the state be notified of the mass layoff. Giving people severance is so they don't sue the company; as part of severance the employee usually signs a document waiving their rights to sue. Severance is not required by law in most states.
You can go to this website to see which employers in Georgia are conducting layoffs that require notice: WARN Website Data Listings - Georgia Department of Economic Development I don't see Expressjet anywhere on there, which probably means that as of now there is no announced plan for widespread layoffs or shutdown of the business. The people who are being terminated are probably part of a smaller number of layoffs that doesn't trigger the thresholds for Federal WARN Act reporting. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:55 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands