Airline Pilot Central Forums
Page 35 of 47
« First
25
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
45
Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   ExpressJet (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/expressjet/)
-   -   Contract 2018 (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/expressjet/116300-contract-2018-a.html)

calmwinds 09-12-2018 12:46 PM
Originally Posted by Melit (Post 2673082)
INC will still be majority owner after Jan 2019 so that will trigger section 6 however
That clause was dropped out of section 6.

da42pilot 09-12-2018 12:54 PM
Originally Posted by calmwinds (Post 2673133)
That clause was dropped out of section 6.
Quietly dropped...

Melit 09-12-2018 12:54 PM
Originally Posted by calmwinds (Post 2673133)
That clause was dropped out of section 6.
By who and why? Because United is not buying xjet? So OO is still pulling the strings? What if OO tells United no thanks we can't staff any new airframes or they don't want to invest millions of dollars to start the 175 program? Maybe the clause was dropped but still applies? You know, a loop hole type deal?

WesternSkies 09-12-2018 01:06 PM
A appreciate the posting and charts and hoping someone in Sapa with snap shot them for when we get company charts in a month or two.

Republic 2018 pay?!? SkyWest is about to move to 2019 pay with or without the current negotiations.
What does that average line include because that is going to move if expressjet/ASA go from the bottom to third.

BlueRaiderAV8R 09-12-2018 01:09 PM
Originally Posted by Melit (Post 2673136)
By who and why? Because United is not buying xjet? So OO is still pulling the strings? What if OO tells United no thanks we can't staff any new airframes or they don't want to invest millions of dollars to start the 175 program? Maybe the clause was dropped but still applies? You know, a loop hole type deal?


It was due to SEC law


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

calmwinds 09-12-2018 01:18 PM
Originally Posted by Melit (Post 2673136)
By who and why? Because United is not buying xjet? So OO is still pulling the strings? What if OO tells United no thanks we can't staff any new airframes or they don't want to invest millions of dollars to start the 175 program? Maybe the clause was dropped but still applies? You know, a loop hole type deal?
The 20 175’s are still in Section 6. Only the ownership part was dropped. Clauses dropped from contracts never apply.

BlueRaiderAV8R 09-12-2018 01:21 PM
I can’t post


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

BlueRaiderAV8R 09-12-2018 01:32 PM
Test


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

TNerjav8r 09-12-2018 01:39 PM
Originally Posted by calmwinds (Post 2673149)
The 20 175’s are still in Section 6. Only the ownership part was dropped. Clauses dropped from contracts never apply.


The union and co say the SkyWest clause is still in effect. The SEC caused it’s removal


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

TNerjav8r 09-12-2018 01:41 PM
Originally Posted by calmwinds (Post 2673149)
The 20 175’s are still in Section 6. Only the ownership part was dropped. Clauses dropped from contracts never apply.
Company and union say that OO clause is still in effect. There was an SEC future looking statement issue. That clause can’t be available to the public..but the language can be “socialized”


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:07 AM.
Page 35 of 47
« First
25
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
45
Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands