Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   ExpressJet (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/expressjet/)
-   -   Will ExpressJet survive this? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/expressjet/128757-will-expressjet-survive.html)

ReadOnly7 04-18-2020 12:51 AM


Originally Posted by uipilot45x (Post 3034871)
Okay, but any troll worth his weight should at least try to answer a simple question.

He’s not going to answer because he knows he will get edited or banned for it.

BusBoy88 04-18-2020 01:48 AM


Originally Posted by uipilot45x (Post 3034895)
He especially doesn’t know how to deliver a punchline.

The guy is like 50 plus and hates life because he never made it to the big leagues. He'll also probably try to tell you he didn't move on because "not everyone wants to work for mainline". But everyone on here knows his personality is what would preclude him from moving on to one of the more sought after jobs.

HotDogSonicBoom 04-18-2020 03:46 AM


Originally Posted by BusBoy88 (Post 3034957)
The guy is like 50 plus and hates life because he never made it to the big leagues. He'll also probably try to tell you he didn't move on because "not everyone wants to work for mainline". But everyone on here knows his personality is what would preclude him from moving on to one of the more sought after jobs.

Honestly, what makes any of us think s/he actually has a job? I wouldn’t be surprised if the person maybe used to fly but doesn’t anymore. All s/he does is go into every forum and disrupt it. They really have no life

uipilot45x 04-18-2020 04:50 AM


Originally Posted by ReadOnly7 (Post 3034951)
He’s not going to answer because he knows he will get edited or banned for it.

I think you hit the nail right on the head.

Melit 04-18-2020 05:35 AM

Good morning..

Melit 04-18-2020 05:37 AM


Originally Posted by HotDogSonicBoom (Post 3034974)
Honestly, what makes any of us think s/he actually has a job? I wouldn’t be surprised if the person maybe used to fly but doesn’t anymore. All s/he does is go into every forum and disrupt it. They really have no life

Disrupt as in tell the truth? You guys weren’t thumping your chest about taking Mesa’s 175’s?

HotDogSonicBoom 04-18-2020 05:49 AM


Originally Posted by Melit (Post 3035018)
Disrupt as in tell the truth? You guys weren’t thumping your chest about taking Mesa’s 175’s?

No. I didn’t. You’re lying now. Show me where I did that.

DBono 04-18-2020 06:51 AM


Originally Posted by Longhornmaniac8 (Post 3034928)
For what it's worth, at YX, we received word yesterday we will not be doing any flying for UA in IAH or DEN for at least the next three months. I know the situation is fluid, but it's kind of difficult to imagine UA doing that if they intend on letting XJT fly west, as it were.

Longhorn, I've been wondering whether the YX/OO model of owning all/most of their airplanes in this environment is as much of an advantage as people seem to think. Seems to me the key question is how much is financed and what is the cost of servicing those notes? Those are fixed costs that don't rise and fall with the amount of flying. Any feel for this for YX and OO?

simscott 04-18-2020 06:57 AM


Originally Posted by DBono (Post 3035083)
Longhorn, I've been wondering whether the YX/OO model of owning all/most of their airplanes in this environment is as much of an advantage as people seem to think. Seems to me the key question is how much is financed and what is the cost of servicing those notes? Those are fixed costs that don't rise and fall with the amount of flying. Any feel for this for YX and OO?

I would think owning their own planes provides collateral for restructuring or loans needed.

amcnd 04-18-2020 07:38 AM

And off loads the responsibility from the Major partner.. Allows UA/DL/AA to not have that debt when there seeking credit...

Softpayman 04-18-2020 11:02 AM


Originally Posted by Melit (Post 3034723)
There is no reason.

I’ll tell you what’s funny. Somebody working for Mesa acting strong. Mesa will always be Mesa.

terks43 04-18-2020 12:56 PM


Originally Posted by Softpayman (Post 3035272)
I’ll tell you what’s funny. Somebody working for Mesa acting strong. Mesa will always be Mesa.

He doesn’t work at Mesa bud. He’s a troll on our boards to.

DBono 04-18-2020 03:59 PM


Originally Posted by simscott (Post 3035091)
I would think owning their own planes provides collateral for restructuring or loans needed.

Thus the question of how much they still owe on the planes. If the plane is registered to you, you're considered the owner, but if you borrowed 80% of the value to buy it and have only paid back a little of that, then there is not much equity left to serve as collateral.

flightlessbirds 04-18-2020 05:02 PM


Originally Posted by DBono (Post 3035479)
Thus the question of how much they still owe on the planes. If the plane is registered to you, you're considered the owner, but if you borrowed 80% of the value to buy it and have only paid back a little of that, then there is not much equity left to serve as collateral.

Exactly! Similar to 2008 — home ownership is great but if you don’t have enough equity to weather an asset value decrease without the ability to keep cash flows coming in it can quickly become a weight around your neck and not a help through turbulent times.

It was this thinking that informed my earlier post. Maybe some of these outfits that own their planes are the ‘underwater homeowners’ caught unemployed in 2008. In which case there might be some really cheap airframes available as they pawn some off in distressed times to save the company. Not a pretty picture but one I’m thinking more about.

captive apple 04-18-2020 05:22 PM

Sure owning your own (financed) aircraft means the bank and not your customer is the one to shut you down. Pros and cons.
What is abnormal about this, what would a bank do with planes nobody in THE WORLD can fill right now? Repo and storage would have an associated cost. Until there is a buyer somewhere in the world a banks bet is to be made whole later by the current owner.

Melit 04-19-2020 06:56 AM


Originally Posted by Softpayman (Post 3035272)
I’ll tell you what’s funny. Somebody working for Mesa acting strong. Mesa will always be Mesa.

Thanks for proving my point. Karma! This is the only group that openly trash talks other pilot groups. Mesa, GoJets and Skywest. ManAir doesn’t even own a tug... lol

HighWingingIt 04-19-2020 08:27 AM


Originally Posted by Melit (Post 3035787)
Thanks for proving my point. Karma! This is the only group that openly trash talks other pilot groups. Mesa, GoJets and Skywest. ManAir doesn’t even own a tug... lol


Interesting...you must not hangout in the AA WO forums

itsmytime 04-19-2020 08:31 AM


Originally Posted by HighWingingIt (Post 3035866)
Interesting...you must not hangout in the AA WO forums

or republic.

uipilot45x 04-19-2020 09:00 AM


Originally Posted by Melit (Post 3035787)
Thanks for proving my point. Karma! This is the only group that openly trash talks other pilot groups. Mesa, GoJets and Skywest. ManAir doesn’t even own a tug... lol

There you go with ManAir again. What’s the dig? Where’s the punchline?

Itsajob 04-19-2020 09:25 AM


Originally Posted by uipilot45x (Post 3035894)
There you go with ManAir again. What’s the dig? Where’s the punchline?

The punchline is that he gets a response. Asking a question that has an unpleasant answer, or talking about some of the stuff going on right now may involve ideas or possibilities that people don’t want to hear, but he just says stuff to stir the pot. Keep feeding trolls, and they keep coming back.

blockplus 04-19-2020 07:33 PM

Manair is a river in India. Maybe this human is from that part of the world and is longing for the old country.
https://youtu.be/yQ7c6FK8jgA

sMFer 04-19-2020 08:21 PM


Originally Posted by Melit (Post 3034813)
so you admit it ?


Here’s a question you can answer. Why are you a 50+ year old regional lifer?

BusBoy88 04-19-2020 09:04 PM


Originally Posted by sMFer (Post 3036289)
Here’s a question you can answer. Why are you a 50+ year old regional lifer?

Uh oh.....Melit hates that question! That's why he's so angry deep down inside.

Tpinks 04-19-2020 10:31 PM

for reference, Republic’s 2019 Q2/3 staffing cost was 271 million. All airlines were awarded 76% of what they requested to spread the 25 billion evenly through all that requested it. So while ExpressJet may not have received any money, I’m sure the money is allocated. It’s a mater of your management and the treasury coming to an agreement on executing all of this. Same thing with us.


Originally Posted by KCaviator (Post 3033365)
According to our CEO, every regional is under $100 million except YX and OO. For whatever it’s worth.

EDIT: Clearly didn’t see the post right above this. BB spreading #FakeNews.

No, actually he said and I quote “Meanwhile all our regional competitors (except for skywest) fell under the $100 Million Threshold”.
Expressjet operates 50 seaters, they are no longer our competitor. He never made the claim that “every regional” was below 100 mil.

captive apple 04-20-2020 09:42 AM


SEC. 4112. PANDEMIC RELIEF FOR AVIATION WORKERS.
(a) FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR EMPLOYEE WAGES, SALARIES, AND BENEFITS.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, to preserve aviation jobs and compensate air carrier industry workers, the Secretary shall provide financial assistance that shall exclu- sively be used for the continuation of payment of employee wages, salaries, and benefits to—
(1) passenger air carriers, in an aggregate amount up to $25,000,000,000;
(2) cargo air carriers, in the aggregate amount up to $4,000,000,000; and
(3) contractors, in an aggregate amount up to $3,000,000,000.
(b) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary, may use $100,000,000 of the funds made available under section 4120(a) for costs and administrative expenses associated with providing financial assistance under this subtitle.
This is all I could find about $100,000,000 in the law.
What is the significance of $100,000,000 that is being discussed in this thread?

gatorhater 04-20-2020 12:18 PM


Originally Posted by Tpinks (Post 3036332)
Expressjet operates 50 seaters, they are no longer our competitor.

That is a VERY short sighted view. The majors allocate flying and if Regional A can do it at a better value than Regional B the plane will move.

Do you think Wendy’s and Taco Bell are
not competitors because their food options are different? They are certainly competing for your dollar budgeted for food.

If you truly believe your statement please stick to operating planes and never apply to manage anything. Your employees will deserve better.

pangolin 04-20-2020 03:07 PM


Originally Posted by Melit (Post 3032279)
ManAir didn’t get it. United didhttps://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sm977

We don’t know of ANY denials. We only know yes or not yet.

Itsajob 04-20-2020 03:16 PM


Originally Posted by gatorhater (Post 3036729)
That is a VERY short sighted view. The majors allocate flying and if Regional A can do it at a better value than Regional B the plane will move.

Do you think Wendy’s and Taco Bell are
not competitors because their food options are different? They are certainly competing for your dollar budgeted for food.

If you truly believe your statement please stick to operating planes and never apply to manage anything. Your employees will deserve better.

Could it be that he meant they won’t be a competitor because of the statements that United has made regarding 50 seat flying? Currently, 76 seat and 50 seat operators fight for the same scraps, but if United did away with 50 seat flying, then a 50 seat only operator would go away and no longer be competition.

Melit 04-20-2020 03:29 PM


Originally Posted by HighWingingIt (Post 3035866)
Interesting...you must not hangout in the AA WO forums

WO are different then staffing companies..

gatorhater 04-20-2020 03:42 PM


Originally Posted by Itsajob (Post 3036880)
Could it be that he meant they won’t be a competitor because of the statements that United has made regarding 50 seat flying? Currently, 76 seat and 50 seat operators fight for the same scraps, but if United did away with 50 seat flying, then a 50 seat only operator would go away and no longer be competition.

Unless United does away with 50 seaters at Regional A and replaces them with 70+ from B thereby leaving B with no planes.

The fact remains, until there is a definite announcement they better treat each other as the competition or someone is going to get caught with their pants down and not like the result. Maybe Xjet, SkyW, Mesa...who knows but it’s time for mgmt to keep their head on a swivel.

AboveMins 04-20-2020 05:08 PM

Unfortunately, Mesa will never go away. The industry will always need a barometer to help measure where the absolute bottom of the industry is, both in cost and quality. They're a cockroach living though the apocalypse.

Melit 04-20-2020 05:42 PM


Originally Posted by AboveMins (Post 3036986)
Unfortunately, Mesa will never go away. The industry will always need a barometer to help measure where the absolute bottom of the industry is, both in cost and quality. They're a cockroach living though the apocalypse.

In June they pick up MKE-IAH with the 175’s.

701EV 04-20-2020 05:48 PM


Originally Posted by Melit (Post 3037011)
In June they pick up MKE-IAH with the 175’s.


In July in will be a E-145XR :)

701EV

ReadOnly7 04-20-2020 06:16 PM


Originally Posted by Itsajob (Post 3036880)
Currently, 76 seat and 50 seat operators fight for the same scraps....

I read the “town hall” transcripts, and it said we (UAL) we’re down 70% and UAX was down 40%.

Sounds to me like mainline is left with the scraps, while UAX is gnawing on the main course.
🤮

Itsajob 04-20-2020 06:39 PM


Originally Posted by ReadOnly7 (Post 3037030)
I read the “town hall” transcripts, and it said we (UAL) we’re down 70% and UAX was down 40%.

Sounds to me like mainline is left with the scraps, while UAX is gnawing on the main course.
🤮

Cant wait to hear the spread in May when we’re down 90%.

Melit 04-20-2020 07:21 PM


Originally Posted by AboveMins (Post 3036986)
Unfortunately, Mesa will never go away. The industry will always need a barometer to help measure where the absolute bottom of the industry is, both in cost and quality. They're a cockroach living though the apocalypse.

You mad bro? At least Mesa has money to buy airplanes! C5 got some bail out money. Did your staffing company get some? Be thankful United is letting you fly there airplanes..For now! Customer’s would rather be on the175’s.

Melit 04-20-2020 07:30 PM

Why aren’t you guy’s ****ed at United? They let you use their 175’s for a second, then said no more and passed them on.

Melit 04-20-2020 07:35 PM


Originally Posted by AboveMins (Post 3036986)
Unfortunately, Mesa will never go away. The industry will always need a barometer to help measure where the absolute bottom of the industry is, both in cost and quality. They're a cockroach living though the apocalypse.

But Mesa got awarded 175’s to fly

Melit 04-20-2020 08:24 PM


Originally Posted by AboveMins (Post 3036986)
Unfortunately, Mesa will never go away. The industry will always need a barometer to help measure where the absolute bottom of the industry is, both in cost and quality. They're a cockroach living though the apocalypse.

It’s Karma. You guy’s should never have said your talking Mesa’s airplanes! Especially since you have no money!!!

Bluesteal 04-20-2020 08:33 PM


Originally Posted by Melit (Post 3037098)
It’s Karma. You guy’s should never have said your talking Mesa’s airplanes! Especially since you have no money!!!

Do you even know what is going on?? You don't even have to tell me what airline you fly for because everything is coming down. Oil just crashed today, you are going to be on the street and you are here laughing at Xjt, get ready for the streets, cause thats where we all are heading! You won't be laughing pretty soon


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:30 AM.


Website Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands