Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

Furloughs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-05-2020 | 09:04 PM
  #61  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DirkDiggler
It amazes me, these greedy executives and CEO's. Over the last 10 years the airlines have posted billions upon billions in profits, of which 96% of that went towards shareholder buybacks. Now a rainy day comes along and they cry to congress they have no money. Meanwhile over the past decade the executives have amassed their own little fortunes. Now congress, using the American taxpayer dollars bails them out, to protect maybe some jobs. But in the end a good amount of people will still probably be furloughed anyway. It's almost criminal.
Sure they made billions over the years, and now they're losing billions each month. That's not a rainy day, it's an apocalypse. But it's the CEOs fault for being greedy. They should have foreseen a cataclysmic event that would dwarf 9/11 and make it look like a minor slowdown.
Reply
Old 05-05-2020 | 11:34 PM
  #62  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: FO
Default

Originally Posted by dmspilot
Sure they made billions over the years, and now they're losing billions each month. That's not a rainy day, it's an apocalypse. But it's the CEOs fault for being greedy. They should have foreseen a cataclysmic event that would dwarf 9/11 and make it look like a minor slowdown.
Maybe a bit of both. The share buybacks have (or had) become absurd in scope and magnitude. Imagine what UAL could have done with just half of what they blew on buybacks-facility improvements, GSE, software, etc...or even a rainy day fund. They went into this disaster with essentially zero money in the bank. I'm not saying keep a few billion in the bank, but a few hundred million wouldn't hurt, to blunt the initial impact of whatever disaster struck. The activist investors need to be kept on a leash. Management seems loyal to them but as soon as UAL dumps 2B into buybacks the investors sell and move on. So much for loyalty.
Reply
Old 05-06-2020 | 04:33 AM
  #63  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Default

A few hundred million is about 3 days of operating expenses. They now have about 9 billion in cash which covers about 3 months of operating expenses.
Reply
Old 05-06-2020 | 05:05 AM
  #64  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by beefburrito
A few hundred million is about 3 days of operating expenses. They now have about 9 billion in cash which covers about 3 months of operating expenses.
3 months operating expenses is nothing when revenue is practically zero. A bunch of that cash is in the form of loans which have to be paid back with interest. You also don’t go into bankruptcy broke, it takes money to play that game. United is being criticized for making aggressive cuts in workers hours, downgrading positions, and preparing now for a smaller company this fall. As a result, our cash burn is about half of what AA and DAL.
Reply
Old 05-06-2020 | 05:13 AM
  #65  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Delsol
Maybe a bit of both. The share buybacks have (or had) become absurd in scope and magnitude. Imagine what UAL could have done with just half of what they blew on buybacks-facility improvements, GSE, software, etc...or even a rainy day fund. They went into this disaster with essentially zero money in the bank. I'm not saying keep a few billion in the bank, but a few hundred million wouldn't hurt, to blunt the initial impact of whatever disaster struck. The activist investors need to be kept on a leash. Management seems loyal to them but as soon as UAL dumps 2B into buybacks the investors sell and move on. So much for loyalty.
United went into this with money in the bank. Airlines thought that 9/11 was the worst case scenario and there was money in the bank to ride that out. This is unprecedented. It makes 9/11 look like a mild financial setback. Companies plan for rainy days, but no airline ever thought that 4-5 months of near zero revenue was even a remote possibility.
Reply
Old 05-06-2020 | 06:51 AM
  #66  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob
3 months operating expenses is nothing when revenue is practically zero. A bunch of that cash is in the form of loans which have to be paid back with interest. You also don’t go into bankruptcy broke, it takes money to play that game. United is being criticized for making aggressive cuts in workers hours, downgrading positions, and preparing now for a smaller company this fall. As a result, our cash burn is about half of what AA and DAL.
Agreed.

I was responding to the poster prior to me that said they should have a few hundred million sitting around and was pointing out that they DO have that and that it's a drop in the bucket compared to what they need.
Reply
Old 05-06-2020 | 07:48 AM
  #67  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob
3 months operating expenses is nothing when revenue is practically zero. A bunch of that cash is in the form of loans which have to be paid back with interest. You also don’t go into bankruptcy broke, it takes money to play that game. United is being criticized for making aggressive cuts in workers hours, downgrading positions, and preparing now for a smaller company this fall. As a result, our cash burn is about half of what AA and DAL.
United is being criticized because the CARE cash is specifically for employee payroll. Cutting hours is not allowed. United should return the money.
Reply
Old 05-06-2020 | 08:00 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RJpilot1
United is being criticized because the CARE cash is specifically for employee payroll. Cutting hours is not allowed. United should return the money.
The problem is, the money infusion didn’t come with instructions on how it was to be distributed. The company has attorneys to parse every word in the Act and bend them whichever way best suits the company’s need.
Reply
Old 05-06-2020 | 08:02 AM
  #69  
UnitedExpress's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RJpilot1
United is being criticized because the CARE cash is specifically for employee payroll. Cutting hours is not allowed. United should return the money.
On the surface it appears XJT is following exactly what United is doing.
Reply
Old 05-06-2020 | 08:04 AM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob
3 months operating expenses is nothing when revenue is practically zero. A bunch of that cash is in the form of loans which have to be paid back with interest. You also don’t go into bankruptcy broke, it takes money to play that game. United is being criticized for making aggressive cuts in workers hours, downgrading positions, and preparing now for a smaller company this fall. As a result, our cash burn is about half of what AA and DAL.
Southwest, Spirit, and probably some of the other low cost carriers are licking their chops right now. While the legacies will shrink, these guys will grab market share that will be ceded as this is winding down.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KCaviator
Republic Airways
43
05-07-2020 10:05 AM
bender
Delta
405
04-19-2020 08:09 AM
Bumm
Major
11
03-18-2020 09:31 AM
Whacker77
Regional
4
06-15-2009 06:03 PM
CRM1337
Major
0
09-15-2005 06:47 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices