Expressjet 3808
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 0
We don't ever allow the identification of crew members by name to the public, for obvious security reasons.
But we don't have a policy such that you can't reference specific flight numbers...we do it all the time (see the SWA wrong-airport thread in the Majors section).
It's up to the OP to decide whether this is the best way to deal with this sort of thing.
If he had asked me in advance I would have advised him not to post in this manner because it's going to get back to management...unless that's what he wanted. But it's way too late to shut the barn door now.
But I'll admit it's a bit disturbing that US 121 pilots are still flying with ice...intentionally or accidentally. I consider it non-trivial and is certainly a legit point of discussion on APC (maybe without the flight number next time).
But we don't have a policy such that you can't reference specific flight numbers...we do it all the time (see the SWA wrong-airport thread in the Majors section).
It's up to the OP to decide whether this is the best way to deal with this sort of thing.
If he had asked me in advance I would have advised him not to post in this manner because it's going to get back to management...unless that's what he wanted. But it's way too late to shut the barn door now.
But I'll admit it's a bit disturbing that US 121 pilots are still flying with ice...intentionally or accidentally. I consider it non-trivial and is certainly a legit point of discussion on APC (maybe without the flight number next time).
This OP is all about looking like a hero. An intelligent person would have phoned pro-standards, or even spoke to the XJT CP directly. And then, like you said, for the benefit of all, talked about it in general terms on this board.
What he did is basically defamation. And I call into question his interpretation of the situation based on his very questionable judgement in posting about it. I wasn't there, I don't know, and that's kinda the point.
In the case of WN landing on the wrong runway. Well that's irrefutable, so I see it as different.
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Remember this? deicing the russian way.flv - YouTube
In Soviet Russia, ice de-planes.
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
From: Home with my family playing with my daughter as much as possible
I understand the safety factor...but on APF? We have to be more professional than this folks. All conversations are open to the public. This could have been handled differently...
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Here at Skywest the feds knowing allowed an airplane to takeoff with frost on the wings. The Fed actually took his own pictures! Then subsequently tried to suspend both crewmember's licenses when they returned to SLC from the outstation.
#35
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
If you fly the public expect scrutiny. If you play fast and loose you might get called out. There is nothing stopping a informed passenger calling a news station and blasting the story. If indeed the crew intended to deice this matter will go nowhere but maybe the OP provided some positive stimulus to the crew to wake up and realize their responsibility. Posting on here maybe be indiscreet but taking off with frost covered wings is reckless.
#36
Because, "frost" to me is just like the little frozen condensation left after fueling, anymore than that is "ice" IMO. But someone else might think of lots of actual ice obstructing flow and hence a severe safety issue.
Either way, listing and airline, and flight number on APC or any public forum may get this crew in trouble. It would have been better to say something like "on a regional jet yesterday, XXXXXX happened prior to takeoff, is this an issue?" and just see what people think about it.
No need to cause a panic, and possible damage this crews career over what is likely a misunderstanding by a passenger.
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
If you fly the public expect scrutiny. If you play fast and loose you might get called out. There is nothing stopping a informed passenger calling a news station and blasting the story. If indeed the crew intended to deice this matter will go nowhere but maybe the OP provided some positive stimulus to the crew to wake up and realize their responsibility. Posting on here maybe be indiscreet but taking off with frost covered wings is reckless.
Posting it on APF is inappropriate for the same reason it's inappropriate for a dunk guy to argue with his wife on the front lawn of his trailer park.
#38
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
The crew wouldn't get in trouble because the passenger doesn't know what they are talking about. The crew might get in trouble if they were being careless and carelessness in aviation is deadly. With stakes that high lets not promote keeping mistakes in the shadows.
#39
Line Holder
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 27
From: 737 CA
I remember reading a thread months ago...I think by a FedEx pilot who observed a foreign (Asian if I recall) airline taking off without deicing while on a deadhead. Every reply was vilifying the flight crew and demanding they never fly on them again.
EWR doesn't deice anywhere near the runways, they do it near the terminals. You'd think someone riding in the back (a crewmember no less) would be a little bit aware of what was going on.
Just think how the replies would be in this thread if this wasn't a US crew represented by the almighty ALPA.
EWR doesn't deice anywhere near the runways, they do it near the terminals. You'd think someone riding in the back (a crewmember no less) would be a little bit aware of what was going on.
Just think how the replies would be in this thread if this wasn't a US crew represented by the almighty ALPA.
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: FO
I'm sure they were going to de ice, who said has to be at the gate. No PA omg the nerve!....your welcome for the ride!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



