Surrendering Passport
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2011
Posts: 166
?? I thought they needed permission past 84 hours. Thought you could refuse past 84 extra hours. This doesn’t sound legal. Did you tell them no?
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,224
If you let them keep you out past 84 hours involuntarily, that’s your problem. You should have told them to build you a deadhead home.
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 333
Wrong!
Consent:permission for something to happen or agreement to do something.
Sounds like to me they need to have permission first. It shouldn’t be the pilot’s responsibility to have them rebuild the pairing.
At 84 hours CRS should be automatically getting the pilot back to domicile, if they would like him/her to extend past 84, they need to get their permission first.
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 1559
Posts: 1,533
Contract says it requires “consent” by the pilot to go past 84 hours. They never asked, which they should do before extending a pilot past 84.
Consent:permission for something to happen or agreement to do something.
Sounds like to me they need to have permission first. It shouldn’t be the pilot’s responsibility to have them rebuild the pairing.
At 84 hours CRS should be automatically getting the pilot back to domicile, if they would like him/her to extend past 84, they need to get their permission first.
Consent:permission for something to happen or agreement to do something.
Sounds like to me they need to have permission first. It shouldn’t be the pilot’s responsibility to have them rebuild the pairing.
At 84 hours CRS should be automatically getting the pilot back to domicile, if they would like him/her to extend past 84, they need to get their permission first.
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,820
Contract says it requires “consent” by the pilot to go past 84 hours. They never asked, which they should do before extending a pilot past 84.
Consent:permission for something to happen or agreement to do something.
Sounds like to me they need to have permission first. It shouldn’t be the pilot’s responsibility to have them rebuild the pairing.
At 84 hours CRS should be automatically getting the pilot back to domicile, if they would like him/her to extend past 84, they need to get their permission first.
Consent:permission for something to happen or agreement to do something.
Sounds like to me they need to have permission first. It shouldn’t be the pilot’s responsibility to have them rebuild the pairing.
At 84 hours CRS should be automatically getting the pilot back to domicile, if they would like him/her to extend past 84, they need to get their permission first.
Were you not aware that there was a limit in the contract to how long they could extend you?
If you were aware of that limit, did you contact them as soon as you saw your pairing revision?
Unless you were totally unaware that there is an extension limit in the contract (your fault if so), then you should have contacted scheduling and told them that you did not want to extend beyond the 84 hours. They would have revised your pairing to get you back to base within 84 hours.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UnlimitedAkro
Regional
1
07-11-2007 03:51 PM