2% pay raise in Oct 2020
09-10-2020 | 08:06 AM
#341
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,425
Likes: 0
From: 757 Capt
Well, that didn’t work.
FedEx EIN is 621721435
This is the link that pops up under a google search for form 5500 filings.
Pension filings lag, so don’t expect to find a 2020 one
Most recent one was filed in 2020, but it’s for plan year 2018. I blame the lawyers
https://www.efast.dol.gov/portal/app...execution=e2s1
FedEx EIN is 621721435
This is the link that pops up under a google search for form 5500 filings.
Pension filings lag, so don’t expect to find a 2020 one
Most recent one was filed in 2020, but it’s for plan year 2018. I blame the lawyers
https://www.efast.dol.gov/portal/app...execution=e2s1
09-10-2020 | 12:19 PM
#342
Banned
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
Zero additional Reserve Lines will go to it.
Unless you have some secret information that indicates the Company feels they need more flexibility somehow, and sees the need to push to modify the percentage of known R days required in the Bidpack to something less than 80%.
Survey's open. All it would take to go back to the nirvana of Pre-CBA2015 is requiring all known R days be published in the bidpack, return the R day conflict drop to CBA 2011 language (Whole Blocks didn't drop for conflicts), and allow Involuntary Conversions of Reserve Lines.
Involuntary Conversions were rare, but they sucked huge.
And I could certainly be wrong here, but I think more people like having the easier R day drops and the ability to use the View\Add window to improve their lot in life than are upset over the reduction in Reserve Lines.
Unless you have some secret information that indicates the Company feels they need more flexibility somehow, and sees the need to push to modify the percentage of known R days required in the Bidpack to something less than 80%.
Survey's open. All it would take to go back to the nirvana of Pre-CBA2015 is requiring all known R days be published in the bidpack, return the R day conflict drop to CBA 2011 language (Whole Blocks didn't drop for conflicts), and allow Involuntary Conversions of Reserve Lines.
Involuntary Conversions were rare, but they sucked huge.
And I could certainly be wrong here, but I think more people like having the easier R day drops and the ability to use the View\Add window to improve their lot in life than are upset over the reduction in Reserve Lines.
Thanks for providing real information on what issues we had prior to 2015 and what issues the contract resolved. I appreciate the facts you provide as apposition to the gripping others provide.
09-10-2020 | 01:46 PM
#343
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
stop telling the truth. Stop talking about the gains we have made and the issues that have been fixed in our last 2 contracts. Start talking in generalities and acting like all we have done is gotten screwed. It’s unbelievable to hear those who have been around for 15-20 years who forget about the issues 15-20 years ago that no longer exists. Well guess what the survey is open so maybe they will ask to go back to pre 2015 cba.
Thanks for providing real information on what issues we had prior to 2015 and what issues the contract resolved. I appreciate the facts you provide as apposition to the gripping others provide.
Thanks for providing real information on what issues we had prior to 2015 and what issues the contract resolved. I appreciate the facts you provide as apposition to the gripping others provide.
09-11-2020 | 10:30 AM
#344
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,626
Likes: 0
Stop telling the truth. Stop talking about the gains we have made and the issues that have been fixed in our last 2 contracts. Start talking in generalities and acting like all we have done is gotten screwed. It’s unbelievable to hear those who have been around for 15-20 years who forget about the issues 15-20 years ago that no longer exists. Well guess what the survey is open so maybe they will ask to go back to pre 2015 CBA.
Thanks for providing real information on what issues we had prior to 2015 and what issues the contract resolved. I appreciate the facts you provide as apposition to the gripping others provide.
Thanks for providing real information on what issues we had prior to 2015 and what issues the contract resolved. I appreciate the facts you provide as apposition to the gripping others provide.
The company is going to expand the use of PBS. They'll dangle another carrot in front of our faces to "fix" an issue they created and we'll bite off on it.
Since the internet lives forever, I will gladly say "I WAS COMPLETELY WRONG and YOU ALL WERE RIGHT" if we go without an increase in PBS. Right now the bidpacks are running 1/5 - 1/3 PBS and varies month to month, equipment to equipment.
What basis do you have that we will hold the line to PBS? We didn't last contract.
09-11-2020 | 11:26 AM
#345
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,174
Likes: 1
It doesn’t help us to impune the character of an entire body, especially on hearsay. Is it even the same 15 people then versus now? It’s doesn’t help to generalize all of them in that manner. I’m not sure why that doesn’t make sense to you?
09-11-2020 | 11:28 AM
#346
Banned
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
He's telling the truth. He just ignores or disagrees that in exchange for what he had "fixed" (company made problem) we now have PBS on property and they've taken away some reserve lines.
The company is going to expand the use of PBS. They'll dangle another carrot in front of our faces to "fix" an issue they created and we'll bite off on it.
Since the internet lives forever, I will gladly say "I WAS COMPLETELY WRONG and YOU ALL WERE RIGHT" if we go without an increase in PBS. Right now the bidpacks are running 1/5 - 1/3 PBS and varies month to month, equipment to equipment.
What basis do you have that we will hold the line to PBS? We didn't last contract.
The company is going to expand the use of PBS. They'll dangle another carrot in front of our faces to "fix" an issue they created and we'll bite off on it.
Since the internet lives forever, I will gladly say "I WAS COMPLETELY WRONG and YOU ALL WERE RIGHT" if we go without an increase in PBS. Right now the bidpacks are running 1/5 - 1/3 PBS and varies month to month, equipment to equipment.
What basis do you have that we will hold the line to PBS? We didn't last contract.
09-11-2020 | 11:35 AM
#347
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,174
Likes: 1
KISS
A-fund as is
maxed b-plan with cash over cap.
retirement healthcare improvement (since they refuse to keep a-plan growing with growth of income which was as it was intended)
NO PBS, schedules are already bad enuf.
3-4 % raise.
Thats it. My daughter in HS could negotiate that in few weeks. Go into section 6 with a vote...old school.
A-fund as is
maxed b-plan with cash over cap.
retirement healthcare improvement (since they refuse to keep a-plan growing with growth of income which was as it was intended)
NO PBS, schedules are already bad enuf.
3-4 % raise.
Thats it. My daughter in HS could negotiate that in few weeks. Go into section 6 with a vote...old school.
Your aim is low, especially on pay rates.
09-11-2020 | 11:40 AM
#348
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,174
Likes: 1
With hard line bidding and conflicts how else would you cover those trips? I guess you could have a 2 day turnaround after the conflict input window and then make a bunch of lines out of the conflict trips and then have a 2nd bid but that process would take 7 days minimum. So do we make the total bid window longer?
There are many airlines still using hard line bidding. Maybe we should look at what they do?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
