Search
Notices

Negotiations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-2022, 12:34 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: Fetal in the hub
Posts: 410
Default

Originally Posted by FDX1 View Post
That is the most moronic sentiment and. Shows zero thought about the seriousness of this post.

The entire concept is akin to having an abortion, hoping that the next baby will be more acceptable.

But hey- you do you, I’ll weigh the entirety of the agreement and vote up or down based on the merits of the final product.
This entire statement codifies why this pilot group is the weakest I've been apart of in nearly 30 years in this business.

We've telegraphed the concessionary horse trading mentality that we have from the beginning. The notion that we were going to "amend" vitally important parts of the contract outside of section 6 says everything we need to know about what the leadership believes is the right direction.

I don't need to wait to read that. Sometimes the baby is stillborn and ya know it in advance.

But you go on ahead.

We are in a position where we are given praise for team effort, but also given the same old "you're a cost to be minimized" treatment. The scary thing is many of the clowns in this joint actually believe that's the way things SHOULD be.

As to this oft repeated, entirely wrong, and misguided prattle about public negotiation, nothing said in this or any other forum matters to negotiations. What matters is WILL YOU ACCEPT ANY CONCESSIONS IN A TA presented? Its pretty damn clear to me lots of folks here will and the NC believes that too. I've been through several airline contract negotiations including at least one other here and never once was the deciding factor what someone said on the internet.
Shaman is offline  
Old 01-08-2022, 03:10 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,093
Default

Originally Posted by Temocil27 View Post
Other ALPA airlines have forums on their union websites. At a previous airline, it was a pretty active place where we could say whatever was on our minds without fear of public scrutiny. DEAR FDX ALPA, MAYBE WE CAN HAVE A FEDEX PILOT FORUM WHERE WE CAN DISCUSS PRIVATE MATTERS IN PRIVATE?
Someone brought it up in a PUB call a while back, MEC shot it down. They're happy being among the short list of union airlines that don't have one.

Originally Posted by Frank717 View Post
While I understand your sentiments, I advise everyone that NOTHING is ever private. Even airlines have pulled “secure” WhatsApp, ALPA and APC forums as part of ‘discovery’ during lawsuits and trials. I’m a ALPA guy, not at your company, but still just want to warn everyone, they are watching. F & H and your company have people who comb these post daily, cross check names with other emails, IP addressed and anything they can. Don’t ever post anything that you don’t want to see in a trial is my advice.

Nothing is private. Even “van” talk has shown up in courtrooms, so just be cautious.
Some other unions have clauses in their CBAs that posts on the union forum can't be used by the company for disciplinary action against a pilot nor for litigation against the union even if the company manages to get screenshots. So yes, not "private" but also a relatively "safe place" for the pilot group to engage. FedEx pilots do not have a safe place to engage which is why the union is so weak.
threeighteen is offline  
Old 01-08-2022, 08:34 AM
  #23  
Aspiring PSA Captain
 
Merle Haggard's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2020
Posts: 824
Default

Originally Posted by threeighteen View Post
Someone brought it up in a PUB call a while back, MEC shot it down. They're happy being among the short list of union airlines that don't have one.



Some other unions have clauses in their CBAs that posts on the union forum can't be used by the company for disciplinary action against a pilot nor for litigation against the union even if the company manages to get screenshots. So yes, not "private" but also a relatively "safe place" for the pilot group to engage. FedEx pilots do not have a safe place to engage which is why the union is so weak.
Not necessarily. The UAL MEC has forums. Their MEC chairman controls the conversation at a level akin to Chairman Mao. Not surprisingly, anything that doesn't perfectly reflect the views of he and his buddies is purged. They wind up using it as an instrument to consolidate and maintain power.
Merle Haggard is offline  
Old 01-08-2022, 11:21 AM
  #24  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
Default

Originally Posted by threeighteen View Post
Someone brought it up in a PUB call a while back, MEC shot it down. They're happy being among the short list of union airlines that don't have one.



Some other unions have clauses in their CBAs that posts on the union forum can't be used by the company for disciplinary action against a pilot nor for litigation against the union even if the company manages to get screenshots. So yes, not "private" but also a relatively "safe place" for the pilot group to engage. FedEx pilots do not have a safe place to engage which is why the union is so weak.
Yes, we have places to engage our representatives and it’s called LEC meetings. PUB calls have also been going on since Covid. Kickoff rally just a few months ago also. A simple phone call or email also works. I have engaged with my representative a few times. Having an open forum for people to say whatever they want and having that owned by a union is a massive liability. This is why United pulls stuff from theirs constantly. If you choose not to show up that’s your fault.
Noworkallplay is offline  
Old 01-08-2022, 11:35 AM
  #25  
maxing the min/Moderator
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: 757
Posts: 1,357
Default

Originally Posted by threeighteen View Post
Someone brought it up in a PUB call a while back, MEC shot it down. They're happy being among the short list of union airlines that don't have one.



Some other unions have clauses in their CBAs that posts on the union forum can't be used by the company for disciplinary action against a pilot nor for litigation against the union even if the company manages to get screenshots. So yes, not "private" but also a relatively "safe place" for the pilot group to engage. FedEx pilots do not have a safe place to engage which is why the union is so weak.

Which union would this be?
jetlaggy is offline  
Old 01-08-2022, 11:53 AM
  #26  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
Default

Originally Posted by jetlaggy View Post
Which union would this be?

The poster is misinformed. No such “clause” exists in the USA and would never hold up in court. As we all know anything can be used against you in court, especially if it can be construed as a work action or slander.
Noworkallplay is offline  
Old 01-08-2022, 11:58 AM
  #27  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
Default

Originally Posted by Shaman View Post
This entire statement codifies why this pilot group is the weakest I've been apart of in nearly 30 years in this business.

We've telegraphed the concessionary horse trading mentality that we have from the beginning. The notion that we were going to "amend" vitally important parts of the contract outside of section 6 says everything we need to know about what the leadership believes is the right direction.

I don't need to wait to read that. Sometimes the baby is stillborn and ya know it in advance.

But you go on ahead.

We are in a position where we are given praise for team effort, but also given the same old "you're a cost to be minimized" treatment. The scary thing is many of the clowns in this joint actually believe that's the way things SHOULD be.

As to this oft repeated, entirely wrong, and misguided prattle about public negotiation, nothing said in this or any other forum matters to negotiations. What matters is WILL YOU ACCEPT ANY CONCESSIONS IN A TA presented? Its pretty damn clear to me lots of folks here will and the NC believes that too. I've been through several airline contract negotiations including at least one other here and never once was the deciding factor what someone said on the internet.
I was at a legacy previous to this. You are incorrect. Every negotiations has areas in which pilots get stuff and areas the company gets something. Usually the amount that one side gets compared to another has to do with who has the bargaining power. Look at the bankruptcy era. The pay raises gained by the passenger airlines post bankruptcy era have been funded by scope/code share gives. PBS also funded gains a legacy airlines in the past 10 years. Now the favor is on the side of labor. But to act as if it’s called negotiations for another reason is ill educated.

Why do you think wide-body jobs make up a fraction of the jobs a legacy airlines now?

Last edited by Noworkallplay; 01-08-2022 at 12:08 PM.
Noworkallplay is offline  
Old 01-08-2022, 03:36 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
opt0712's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 670
Default

Originally Posted by Merle Haggard View Post
Not necessarily. The UAL MEC has forums. Their MEC chairman controls the conversation at a level akin to Chairman Mao. Not surprisingly, anything that doesn't perfectly reflect the views of he and his buddies is purged. They wind up using it as an instrument to consolidate and maintain power.
This isn't UAL. It seems you had quite a fire on the UAL boards when you were there. I'd implore you to bring that same fire here at purple and get involved with our union.
opt0712 is offline  
Old 01-08-2022, 03:39 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 210
Default

What is the sound that is made when a tree falls over in the forest and nobody is there to care that the tree was at a legacy before?
BLOB is offline  
Old 01-08-2022, 05:47 PM
  #30  
Aspiring PSA Captain
 
Merle Haggard's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2020
Posts: 824
Default

Originally Posted by opt0712 View Post
This isn't UAL. It seems you had quite a fire on the UAL boards when you were there. I'd implore you to bring that same fire here at purple and get involved with our union.
The point was that a union sponsored board is A) Not a panacea and B) can be easily misused by the leadership. An example would be a constant scrubbing of the board to ensure that only posts supportive of a pancake retirement plan make the cut. That is the type of thing that goes on at UAL ALPA forum. If you want to see just what the MEC wants you to see, then let's go ahead and get ourselves an ALPA sponsored forum. Finally, I have never worked at UAL - just have some vested interests there.
Merle Haggard is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DMEarc
Regional
1249
12-17-2010 10:37 PM
Purple Nugget
Cargo
5
10-18-2010 05:45 PM
1257
Major
15
10-14-2010 11:47 AM
Freighter Captain
Atlas/Polar
3
08-03-2005 03:19 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
05-27-2005 09:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices