Buyer's remorse??
#471
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 281
I believe the Atlas long term contract is up in April. Don’t like seeing their plane on our ramps either.
Next time you are in ATL during the day. We probably have 5-6 wide bodies and a few narrow bodies on the ramp. You think ATL is a giant manufacturing city?
Most of those FedEx planes are to get the belly freight from cities we do not operate our own planes too. One city for example Lagos Nigeria!
Next time you are in ATL during the day. We probably have 5-6 wide bodies and a few narrow bodies on the ramp. You think ATL is a giant manufacturing city?
Most of those FedEx planes are to get the belly freight from cities we do not operate our own planes too. One city for example Lagos Nigeria!
While I agree that there is not a lot of manufacturing in ATL, there are a $4!tt0n of warehouses and consumers. We take relatively full loads there often on the 767 and equal legs out. Picking up a single can from Lagos or Cairo isn’t a big deal, that’s the nature of a network and business expansion.
There comes a point when DL doesn’t want to sell that space to accommodate their pax, or we don’t want to buy it. Then we put a plane on the route. I understand the need for limits and a clear philosophy articulated to the pilots, maybe trigger points, but to a certain extent this is how you build and expand your product offering. Would you rather we not explore new business because we can’t fill a 757 to that country?
#472
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,139
.
While I agree that there is not a lot of manufacturing in ATL, there are a $4!tt0n of warehouses and consumers. We take relatively full loads there often on the 767 and equal legs out. Picking up a single can from Lagos or Cairo isn’t a big deal, that’s the nature of a network and business expansion.
There comes a point when DL doesn’t want to sell that space to accommodate their pax, or we don’t want to buy it. Then we put a plane on the route. I understand the need for limits and a clear philosophy articulated to the pilots, maybe trigger points, but to a certain extent this is how you build and expand your product offering. Would you rather we not explore new business because we can’t fill a 757 to that country?
While I agree that there is not a lot of manufacturing in ATL, there are a $4!tt0n of warehouses and consumers. We take relatively full loads there often on the 767 and equal legs out. Picking up a single can from Lagos or Cairo isn’t a big deal, that’s the nature of a network and business expansion.
There comes a point when DL doesn’t want to sell that space to accommodate their pax, or we don’t want to buy it. Then we put a plane on the route. I understand the need for limits and a clear philosophy articulated to the pilots, maybe trigger points, but to a certain extent this is how you build and expand your product offering. Would you rather we not explore new business because we can’t fill a 757 to that country?
#473
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
This is what I was trying to say in post #462 above. Like you said, we should have trigger points that work both ways. Otherwise we keep could keep seeing situations such as what is happening with ASL recently where those flights are simply moved over to other airlines. Scope is existential to our livelihoods and pilots need to understand that. They need to know that right now the bigger risk isn’t FedEx going out of business and the pension going to the PBGC. The bigger risk is that we don’t own any of our flying. It’s like going through life without any insurance of any kind. It’s great not to have to pay the premiums, until the day you wished you had that insurance policy.
The company couldn’t afford or be competitive replacing our FedEx flying (Within Scope/RLA/NMB) purview in large amounts with contractors due to the penalty payments it would trigger. Didn’t 6-8 airframes cost them over 22 million for a 14 month period. Multiply that over a larger scale. Then add in the cost of the actual contract for the third-party vendor to fly it. Are you not understanding the math?
The 9th freedom rights flying isn’t able to be scoped under the RLA/NMB and hold any credibility within international courts. Read up on UA flight attendants case. It’s case law. Plain and simple.
The belly freight I agree needs more defined language. As others and myself have pointed out though it obviously can’t be counted on for consistent service. It is obviously purely being used as supplemental only when pax airlines have availability. International flying for the passenger airlines is still subdued so they have a little extra room. When things get back to normal, no way they are kicking revenue passengers off to take our half priced boxes.
Last edited by Noworkallplay; 02-11-2023 at 01:50 PM.
#475
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,139
The company couldn’t afford or be competitive replacing our FedEx flying (Within Scope/RLA/NMB) purview in large amounts with contractors due to the penalty payments it would trigger. Didn’t 6-8 airframes cost them over 22 million for a 14 month period. Multiply that over a larger scale. Then add in the cost of the actual contract for the third-party vendor to fly it. Are you not understanding the math?
The 9th freedom rights flying isn’t able to be scoped under the RLA/NMB and hold any credibility within international courts. Read up on UA flight attendants case. It’s case law. Plain and simple.
The belly freight I agree needs more defined language. As others and myself have pointed out though it obviously can’t be counted on for consistent service. It is obviously purely being used as supplemental only when pax airlines have availability. International flying for the passenger airlines is still subdued so they have a little extra room. When things get back to normal, no way they are kicking revenue passengers off to take our half priced boxes.
The 9th freedom rights flying isn’t able to be scoped under the RLA/NMB and hold any credibility within international courts. Read up on UA flight attendants case. It’s case law. Plain and simple.
The belly freight I agree needs more defined language. As others and myself have pointed out though it obviously can’t be counted on for consistent service. It is obviously purely being used as supplemental only when pax airlines have availability. International flying for the passenger airlines is still subdued so they have a little extra room. When things get back to normal, no way they are kicking revenue passengers off to take our half priced boxes.
As for your freedoms, you’ve been rebuked on that already. And you conviniently ignore posts you are rebuked. We used to do a lot of flying ASL does now they didn’t do last month, If you don’t think that’s about management picking them once us, I don’t know what else to tell you. The RLA and our contract applies to us anywhere we fly, That is separate than cabotage and Nth freedom rights. I’m talking about the flights we have the rights to (ie flights taken over by ASL). Why do you keep arguing management’s talking points? This isn’t just about belly freight! And what about crew compliment? Your silence is deafening after I pointed out delta and Hawaiin have that language. Scope isn’t just about one thing. It’s multifaceted and all facets need improvements. We should be able to agree on that. It won’t take away from your decision to come here by realizing that our contract isn’t the best in many areas. For what we do, all sections of our contract should be best!
#477
17 yrs on property. This place has changed, culture changed, vibe has changed, it’s simply NOT the place it used to be. The “FedEx pilot” glory has faded, management doesn’t respect us, they don’t think we deserve to be properly compensated. I CANNOT honestly look into someone’s eyes asking if they should come here and say “yes”…the feeling sucks, it really does…it wasn’t that way a long time ago. So, don’t apply here, go elsewhere. If I was on property less than 5 yrs and were young, I’d totally bail. Good luck with your choice, and I wish everyone a happy, safe, healthy career.
#478
17 yrs on property. This place has changed, culture changed, vibe has changed, it’s simply NOT the place it used to be. The “FedEx pilot” glory has faded, management doesn’t respect us, they don’t think we deserve to be properly compensated. I CANNOT honestly look into someone’s eyes asking if they should come here and say “yes”…the feeling sucks, it really does…it wasn’t that way a long time ago. So, don’t apply here, go elsewhere. If I was on property less than 5 yrs and were young, I’d totally bail. Good luck with your choice, and I wish everyone a happy, safe, healthy career.
It sucks to not be at the place that is, at least in one's own mind, the top.
But really FX was only at the top due to attrition of the pax airlines around us post 9/11. They have since rebounded and left us very far behind in QOL matters, and now pay, while we have been looking through a straw at our payrates.
As FXLAX said in other words, for the Billions in profits we rake in for the shareholders, for the domestic ball-busting schedules we fly, for the nasty stuff we carry and are exposed to, we (along with UPS, even though they get time in SDF vs. MEM) should have the leading contract in every section.
Last edited by CloudSailor; 02-12-2023 at 09:58 AM.
#479
17 yrs on property. This place has changed, culture changed, vibe has changed, it’s simply NOT the place it used to be. The “FedEx pilot” glory has faded, management doesn’t respect us, they don’t think we deserve to be properly compensated. I CANNOT honestly look into someone’s eyes asking if they should come here and say “yes”…the feeling sucks, it really does…it wasn’t that way a long time ago. So, don’t apply here, go elsewhere. If I was on property less than 5 yrs and were young, I’d totally bail. Good luck with your choice, and I wish everyone a happy, safe, healthy career.
after 2015, I went hard at work doing other things, and to the younger ones I would highly recommend finding alternative means of earning income.
#480
17 yrs on property. This place has changed, culture changed, vibe has changed, it’s simply NOT the place it used to be. The “FedEx pilot” glory has faded, management doesn’t respect us, they don’t think we deserve to be properly compensated. I CANNOT honestly look into someone’s eyes asking if they should come here and say “yes”…the feeling sucks, it really does…it wasn’t that way a long time ago. So, don’t apply here, go elsewhere. If I was on property less than 5 yrs and were young, I’d totally bail. Good luck with your choice, and I wish everyone a happy, safe, healthy career.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post