Search

Notices

4a.2.b/c

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-15-2023 | 04:16 PM
  #1  
Merle Haggard's Avatar
Thread Starter
Aspiring PSA Captain
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 203
Default 4a.2.b/c

It is unconscionable and frankly stupid to me that we repeatedly agree to this clause without any qualifications. I am quite sure that the ever-present "intent" of 4.a.2.b. was to help the cause in the event of a force majeure event like 9-11, a war, a natural disaster, etc. How has it become a fallback for management to backtrack on poor decision making or changing their minds about strategy, or just being bent over by activists? It should really be tied to a certain number of consecutive unprofitable quarters or some other metric that proves that the management is in a corner. Invoking 4.a.2.c. while profitable is ludicrous and we need to tighten that $h!t up in TA 2.0.
Reply
Old 07-15-2023 | 04:34 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2023
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Merle Haggard
It is unconscionable and frankly stupid to me that we repeatedly agree to this clause without any qualifications. I am quite sure that the ever-present "intent" of 4.a.2.b. was to help the cause in the event of a force majeure event like 9-11, a war, a natural disaster, etc. How has it become a fallback for management to backtrack on poor decision making or changing their minds about strategy, or just being bent over by activists? It should really be tied to a certain number of consecutive unprofitable quarters or some other metric that proves that the management is in a corner. Invoking 4.a.2.c. while profitable is ludicrous and we need to tighten that $h!t up in TA 2.0.
^^^^^THIS^^^^^
Reply
Old 07-15-2023 | 04:44 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,201
Likes: 32
From: 4A2FU
Default

Originally Posted by Merle Haggard
It is unconscionable and frankly stupid to me that we repeatedly agree to this clause without any qualifications. I am quite sure that the ever-present "intent" of 4.a.2.b. was to help the cause in the event of a force majeure event like 9-11, a war, a natural disaster, etc. How has it become a fallback for management to backtrack on poor decision making or changing their minds about strategy, or just being bent over by activists? It should really be tied to a certain number of consecutive unprofitable quarters or some other metric that proves that the management is in a corner. Invoking 4.a.2.c. while profitable is ludicrous and we need to tighten that $h!t up in TA 2.0.
amen brother
Reply
Old 07-15-2023 | 06:45 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2023
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Merle Haggard
It is unconscionable and frankly stupid to me that we repeatedly agree to this clause without any qualifications. I am quite sure that the ever-present "intent" of 4.a.2.b. was to help the cause in the event of a force majeure event like 9-11, a war, a natural disaster, etc. How has it become a fallback for management to backtrack on poor decision making or changing their minds about strategy, or just being bent over by activists? It should really be tied to a certain number of consecutive unprofitable quarters or some other metric that proves that the management is in a corner. Invoking 4.a.2.c. while profitable is ludicrous and we need to tighten that $h!t up in TA 2.0.
Exactly. Express made over $1 billion in operating income in FY 2023. In Q4 (ending May 31 of this year), they made $430 million at 4.1% operating margin. To be threatening furloughs right now is almost comical.
Reply
Old 07-16-2023 | 03:49 AM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Merle Haggard
It is unconscionable and frankly stupid to me that we repeatedly agree to this clause without any qualifications. I am quite sure that the ever-present "intent" of 4.a.2.b. was to help the cause in the event of a force majeure event like 9-11, a war, a natural disaster, etc. How has it become a fallback for management to backtrack on poor decision making or changing their minds about strategy, or just being bent over by activists? It should really be tied to a certain number of consecutive unprofitable quarters or some other metric that proves that the management is in a corner. Invoking 4.a.2.c. while profitable is ludicrous and we need to tighten that $h!t up in TA 2.0.

excellent perspective
Reply
Old 07-16-2023 | 07:22 AM
  #6  
Flying Boxes's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TomAce
Exactly. Express made over $1 billion in operating income in FY 2023. In Q4 (ending May 31 of this year), they made $430 million at 4.1% operating margin. To be threatening furloughs right now is almost comical.
FedEx isn’t.

ALPA IS!
Reply
Old 07-16-2023 | 08:44 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Flying Boxes
FedEx isn’t.

ALPA IS!
Ya but the NC has the inside info on what the company will do if the TA is voted down. ALPA at the regional level has more balls than FX ALPA. What a joke.
Reply
Old 07-16-2023 | 11:18 AM
  #8  
CloudSailor's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Nordhavn
... ALPA at the regional level has more balls than FX ALPA...
That has been exactly my experience.
Reply
Old 07-16-2023 | 11:31 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,813
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Nordhavn
Ya but the NC has the inside info on what the company will do if the TA is voted down. ALPA at the regional level has more balls than FX ALPA. What a joke.
Too bad you’re not a Fedex pilot. We may need some people to fill some MEC positions.
Reply
Old 07-16-2023 | 12:41 PM
  #10  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 140
Likes: 21
Default

Originally Posted by Nordhavn
Ya but the NC has the inside info on what the company will do if the TA is voted down. ALPA at the regional level has more balls than FX ALPA. What a joke.
ALPA leadership at FedEx is an absolute joke. May and Norman should be ashamed at themselves for providing a concessionary industry worst divisive contract then essentially threatening probationary ALPA members with a furlough who don’t even have a vote in the matter. How it is not a complete conflict of interest to have 2/4 of the major players in this negotiation retiring very soon while trying to negotiate an increased pension at the last minute is beyond me.

As someone who would absolutely be furloughed in the event of a furlough DO NOT vote yes for this because of the fear inducing slander these boobs are regurgitating. Those of us on the so called chopping block IF that were to happen would land just fine with every passenger carrier on earth hiring and regional airlines offering 100k signing bonuses and direct entry captain positions with longevity honored. Try me

Fedex has been nothing short of a disappointment for me so far and a long ways away from the bs that was spoken to us during indoc by management pilots about the best job in the world, how much money we are going to make, hiring 7000 pilots…

before you tell me to leave I can promise you I’m looking at all options and very seriously considering it
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices