Full time FPL and reduced BLGs?
#31
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
And we potentially only lose 10% of our pilots in 3 years if the TA doesn't provide any reason to leave before 65.
How overmanned are we? If you believe what management put out, at least 800. If you use the SAM, we need to lose just over 500 pilots to get it back above 70 hours in a 4 week month.
How overmanned are we? If you believe what management put out, at least 800. If you use the SAM, we need to lose just over 500 pilots to get it back above 70 hours in a 4 week month.
How overmanned are we? Good question. I don’t think the company has officially said. Along with any really helpful information. Pretty much every communication from them is vague to the limit.
Even if we don’t get a TA in 3 years (extremely unlikely IMO), there will still be early retirements, how many is anyone’s guess.
You are also assuming 0 new flying.
Just observations.
#32
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 703
Likes: 56
How overmanned are we? Good question. I don’t think the company has officially said. Along with any really helpful information. Pretty much every communication from them is vague to the limit.
Even if we don’t get a TA in 3 years (extremely unlikely IMO), there will still be early retirements, how many is anyone’s guess.
You are also assuming 0 new flying.
Just observations.
Even if we don’t get a TA in 3 years (extremely unlikely IMO), there will still be early retirements, how many is anyone’s guess.
You are also assuming 0 new flying.
Just observations.
Who said it will take 3 years from now to get a TA? What I said is that when a TA gets ratified, if there isn't an improvement for those who can retire, then they will probably stick around.
You seem to be leaning on the far side of the spectrum that we will have mass retirements, and increase in business over the next 3 years. I am just pointing out the other side of the spectrum. What happens will probably be in the middle. We will see. However, if you are junior, or living pay check to pay check, I would start planning for that rainy day just in case.
#33
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
You’re right I just went back and looked in regard to the staffing. Probably just mentally tossed that info when I read it. The Sam is a much better method to determine staffing but also has its flaws as it does not include all flying accomplished each month.
Nobody says it will take 3 years to get a TA. I’m just saying if you look out 3 years you basically solve the manning issue more or less if flying remains the same with just mandatory retirements.
I’m fairly junior but not in the bottom 20 percent. Plenty in savings.
Nobody says it will take 3 years to get a TA. I’m just saying if you look out 3 years you basically solve the manning issue more or less if flying remains the same with just mandatory retirements.
I’m fairly junior but not in the bottom 20 percent. Plenty in savings.
Last edited by windshearmaxthr; 11-11-2024 at 05:37 AM.
#34
4a was intended as a "break glass in case of emergency" measure and they are using it as a management tool.
#35
The company is quite clearly and disingenuously manipulating the SAM in an effort to get to 4a2c. Without 4a2c they wouldn't be incentivized to falsely drive the SAM (and with it our QOL) into the toilet. They have demonstrated that if they want to get to 4a2c they will manipulate their way there and we can grieve the methodology later after "taking the L".
Furlough will come anyway once we're in 4a2c if that's what they want to do. If it's not then they won't. 4a2c has little bearing on the issue, but it is driving a knife into trip and line QOL that will be very difficult to claw back.
Furlough will come anyway once we're in 4a2c if that's what they want to do. If it's not then they won't. 4a2c has little bearing on the issue, but it is driving a knife into trip and line QOL that will be very difficult to claw back.
#36
It was Block 2 (Cutler), Block 4 (Comer) and Block 11 (Beckwith). Pretty pathetic!
#37
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 703
Likes: 56
What is driving a knife into QOL is picking up disputed pairings. We do it to ourselves.
#39
You have missed the point entirely. The point is that the decision to furlough is not 4a2c driven. If they want to furlough they will and all 4a does is cause them to butcher everyone's QOL to do so. 4a doesn't protect anyone from furlough unless there's only an EXTREMELY marginal case to furlough. If the case to furlough is extremely marginal then they're unlikely to do so anyway.
In the meantime, 4a incentivizes the company to destroy EVERYONE's QOL and W2 just to keep their furlough options open.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



