Notices

TA???

Old 04-11-2026 | 05:41 PM
  #101  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 37
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy
Section 1

1. Expanded Definitions (Affiliate, Control, Entity, and “Not Operationally Feasible”)

2. Additional Part 121 Certificate Coverage
​​​​​​3. Scope Penalty Rate (SPR) Definition 4. Progressive Wet-Lease Penalty Schedule

5. Annual Wet-Lease Hours Notice and Calculation

6. 30-Day Wet-Lease Notice Requirement

7. Penalty Framework for Wet Leases Exceeding Two Bid Periods

8. Additional Penalty for Wet Leases Exceeding 26 Weeks

9. Quarterly Scope Reporting, Information Requests, and Meetings

10. No Involuntary Furlough During Section 1.B.6 Wet Leasing

11. Furlough-Related Wet-Lease Penalties and Recall Requirement

12. Parent, Affiliate, Alter-Ego, and Successorship Language

My biggest complaint is in Section 1.B.6. The old language was this:“b. Except for the minimum two aircraft wet leasing referred to above, during the bid periods described in this paragraph, the Company shall not wet lease more than the net gain of trunk aircraft scheduled to be added and brought into service in any calendar year. Should the Company violate the four bid period restriction, the Company shall pay to the Association the following for each wet lease conducted the greater of the number of block hours scheduled or flown, times 2.0, times the highest hourly rate for a three (3) man crew with fifteen (15) years of pay longevity, in addition to the international override, if any.”


The new language no longer uses that direct net gain of trunk aircraft cap. Instead, it allows wet leasing subject to a progressive penalty schedule based on:
  • wet-lease block hours
  • as a percentage of prior-year FedEx trunk revenue block hours
  • with different thresholds depending on whether the Prior Calendar Year Net Aircraft Difference is negative or non-negative.
Basically, if the trunk fleet shrinks, they are now allowed to wet lease with a financial penalty.

Probably the biggest concession of the TA IMO.
Last 2 sentences are spot on.
Reply
Old 04-11-2026 | 05:47 PM
  #102  
P-3Bubba's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 78
From: P-3C
Default

Originally Posted by Topgum
Soft scope and reduced furlough protection is a scary recipe. That alone is a hard no
You’d vote no to a million dollar recovery payment and Delta +10. Why? The SCOPE!!! FURLOUGH!!!

So they walk all over scope everyday and everywhere from belly frieght to trucking from the HUB during Peak and they’ll do it forever to make $1. They threatened to furlough at least 5 times in the last 2 years. Didn’t do it.

Also, GOT SCOPE? It’s improved from TA23. So keep being ur HARD NO. Ur a LEGO cartoon.

-Bubs
Reply
Old 04-11-2026 | 06:34 PM
  #103  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 37
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by P-3Bubba
You’d vote no to a million dollar recovery payment and Delta +10. Why? The SCOPE!!! FURLOUGH!!!

So they walk all over scope everyday and everywhere from belly frieght to trucking from the HUB during Peak and they’ll do it forever to make $1. They threatened to furlough at least 5 times in the last 2 years. Didn’t do it.

Also, GOT SCOPE? It’s improved from TA23. So keep being ur HARD NO. Ur a LEGO cartoon.

-Bubs
Scope and furlough protection is huge unless you’re approaching retirement, which I’m guessing is the case with you. Just ask the boys at the original Airborne Express.
Superior pay rates and max high 5 doesn’t matter much when displaced to the right seat or furloughed.
I need a contract as much as anyone but not willing to settle for destruction by way of shrinkage. If it’s not a possibility then great, change the language and put that in writing.
Reply
Old 04-11-2026 | 06:52 PM
  #104  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 37
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by P-3Bubba
You’d vote no to a million dollar recovery payment and Delta +10. Why? The SCOPE!!! FURLOUGH!!!

So they walk all over scope everyday and everywhere from belly frieght to trucking from the HUB during Peak and they’ll do it forever to make $1. They threatened to furlough at least 5 times in the last 2 years. Didn’t do it.

Also, GOT SCOPE? It’s improved from TA23. So keep being ur HARD NO. Ur a LEGO cartoon.

-Bubs
So you feel like they’ve walked all over scope and claim they have threatened you 5 times in 2 years, yet you don’t want contractual protection from that situation. Ok
Reply
Old 04-11-2026 | 06:55 PM
  #105  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 204
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by P-3Bubba
You’d vote no to a million dollar recovery payment and Delta +10. Why? The SCOPE!!! FURLOUGH!!!

So they walk all over scope everyday and everywhere from belly frieght to trucking from the HUB during Peak and they’ll do it forever to make $1. They threatened to furlough at least 5 times in the last 2 years. Didn’t do it.

Also, GOT SCOPE? It’s improved from TA23. So keep being ur HARD NO. Ur a LEGO cartoon.

-Bubs
No for scope. Block 3 for reference. It passes 60-65%.
Reply
Old 04-11-2026 | 08:02 PM
  #106  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 10
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy
Section 1

1. Expanded Definitions (Affiliate, Control, Entity, and “Not Operationally Feasible”)

2. Additional Part 121 Certificate Coverage
​​​​​​3. Scope Penalty Rate (SPR) Definition 4. Progressive Wet-Lease Penalty Schedule

5. Annual Wet-Lease Hours Notice and Calculation

6. 30-Day Wet-Lease Notice Requirement

7. Penalty Framework for Wet Leases Exceeding Two Bid Periods

8. Additional Penalty for Wet Leases Exceeding 26 Weeks

9. Quarterly Scope Reporting, Information Requests, and Meetings

10. No Involuntary Furlough During Section 1.B.6 Wet Leasing

11. Furlough-Related Wet-Lease Penalties and Recall Requirement

12. Parent, Affiliate, Alter-Ego, and Successorship Language

My biggest complaint is in Section 1.B.6. The old language was this:“b. Except for the minimum two aircraft wet leasing referred to above, during the bid periods described in this paragraph, the Company shall not wet lease more than the net gain of trunk aircraft scheduled to be added and brought into service in any calendar year. Should the Company violate the four bid period restriction, the Company shall pay to the Association the following for each wet lease conducted the greater of the number of block hours scheduled or flown, times 2.0, times the highest hourly rate for a three (3) man crew with fifteen (15) years of pay longevity, in addition to the international override, if any.”


The new language no longer uses that direct net gain of trunk aircraft cap. Instead, it allows wet leasing subject to a progressive penalty schedule based on:
  • wet-lease block hours
  • as a percentage of prior-year FedEx trunk revenue block hours
  • with different thresholds depending on whether the Prior Calendar Year Net Aircraft Difference is negative or non-negative.
Basically, if the trunk fleet shrinks, they are now allowed to wet lease with a financial penalty.

Probably the biggest concession of the TA IMO.
Your missing a critical point in our current scope:

”Should, at the end of the calendar year, the Company actually bring into service fewer trunk aircraft than were scheduled and based on the schedule, the Company wet leased more aircraft than would have been permitted if the scheduled additions were the same as the actual deliveries, then the Company shall pay to the Association the same monies it would have paid the Association as calculated under Section 1.B.6.a.”

There are no hard caps or limits in our current scope. Anything can be exceeded as long as the company pays the penalty. This hasn’t worsened in TA2026, the formula has just changed to make it simpler to calculate and understand.
Reply
Old 04-12-2026 | 04:45 AM
  #107  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 695
Likes: 54
Default

Originally Posted by Topgum
Soft scope and reduced furlough protection is a scary recipe. That alone is a hard no
There is no reduced furlough protections, the removal of 4a2b/c simply doesn't allow the company to abuse the crew force under the guise of preventing furloughs. Now, the company will have to man the fleets properly and factor in training costs before they furlough rather than simply taking the cost out of every pilots hide.

Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy
Section 1

1. Expanded Definitions (Affiliate, Control, Entity, and “Not Operationally Feasible”)

2. Additional Part 121 Certificate Coverage
​​​​​​3. Scope Penalty Rate (SPR) Definition 4. Progressive Wet-Lease Penalty Schedule

5. Annual Wet-Lease Hours Notice and Calculation

6. 30-Day Wet-Lease Notice Requirement

7. Penalty Framework for Wet Leases Exceeding Two Bid Periods

8. Additional Penalty for Wet Leases Exceeding 26 Weeks

9. Quarterly Scope Reporting, Information Requests, and Meetings

10. No Involuntary Furlough During Section 1.B.6 Wet Leasing

11. Furlough-Related Wet-Lease Penalties and Recall Requirement

12. Parent, Affiliate, Alter-Ego, and Successorship Language

My biggest complaint is in Section 1.B.6. The old language was this:“b. Except for the minimum two aircraft wet leasing referred to above, during the bid periods described in this paragraph, the Company shall not wet lease more than the net gain of trunk aircraft scheduled to be added and brought into service in any calendar year. Should the Company violate the four bid period restriction, the Company shall pay to the Association the following for each wet lease conducted the greater of the number of block hours scheduled or flown, times 2.0, times the highest hourly rate for a three (3) man crew with fifteen (15) years of pay longevity, in addition to the international override, if any.”


The new language no longer uses that direct net gain of trunk aircraft cap. Instead, it allows wet leasing subject to a progressive penalty schedule based on:
  • wet-lease block hours
  • as a percentage of prior-year FedEx trunk revenue block hours
  • with different thresholds depending on whether the Prior Calendar Year Net Aircraft Difference is negative or non-negative.
Basically, if the trunk fleet shrinks, they are now allowed to wet lease with a financial penalty.

Probably the biggest concession of the TA IMO.
Even in a shrinking fleet under current scope, the company is allowed to wet lease a minimum of two aircraft for 4 bid periods without penalty. So last year, they could wet lease 2 aircraft for 133 days without penalty even prior to the MD grounding.
Reply
Old 04-12-2026 | 05:22 AM
  #108  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 581
Likes: 128
From: B767
Default

Originally Posted by Topgum
So you feel like they’ve walked all over scope and claim they have threatened you 5 times in 2 years, yet you don’t want contractual protection from that situation. Ok
why would we need contractual protection from furlough when it would be exceedingly difficult for the company to pull it off with any sense of timeliness or financial benefit? It would take years for butts to get shuffled into new seats the way we run and train big bids. Regarding scope, the company is going to do whatever they need to do- following the CBA or not. Turning this deal down for those two things alone is insane.
Reply
Old 04-12-2026 | 06:40 AM
  #109  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 695
Likes: 54
Default

Originally Posted by Temocil27
why would we need contractual protection from furlough when it would be exceedingly difficult for the company to pull it off with any sense of timeliness or financial benefit? It would take years for butts to get shuffled into new seats the way we run and train big bids. Regarding scope, the company is going to do whatever they need to do- following the CBA or not. Turning this deal down for those two things alone is insane.
Not to mention that under the TA, the company can not enter into a wet lease agreement while any pilot is furloughed. Any agreements that are already in effect require a penalty payment, no free wet lease. That is a furlough protection that we currently don't have. Under current book, the company can wet lease a minimum of two aircraft for 4 bid periods without penalty, even if they furlough.
Reply
Old 04-12-2026 | 08:34 AM
  #110  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 73
Likes: 31
From: FO
Default

Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy
Section 1

1. Expanded Definitions (Affiliate, Control, Entity, and “Not Operationally Feasible”)

2. Additional Part 121 Certificate Coverage
​​​​​​3. Scope Penalty Rate (SPR) Definition 4. Progressive Wet-Lease Penalty Schedule

5. Annual Wet-Lease Hours Notice and Calculation

6. 30-Day Wet-Lease Notice Requirement

7. Penalty Framework for Wet Leases Exceeding Two Bid Periods

8. Additional Penalty for Wet Leases Exceeding 26 Weeks

9. Quarterly Scope Reporting, Information Requests, and Meetings

10. No Involuntary Furlough During Section 1.B.6 Wet Leasing

11. Furlough-Related Wet-Lease Penalties and Recall Requirement

12. Parent, Affiliate, Alter-Ego, and Successorship Language

My biggest complaint is in Section 1.B.6. The old language was this:“b. Except for the minimum two aircraft wet leasing referred to above, during the bid periods described in this paragraph, the Company shall not wet lease more than the net gain of trunk aircraft scheduled to be added and brought into service in any calendar year. Should the Company violate the four bid period restriction, the Company shall pay to the Association the following for each wet lease conducted the greater of the number of block hours scheduled or flown, times 2.0, times the highest hourly rate for a three (3) man crew with fifteen (15) years of pay longevity, in addition to the international override, if any.”


The new language no longer uses that direct net gain of trunk aircraft cap. Instead, it allows wet leasing subject to a progressive penalty schedule based on:
  • wet-lease block hours
  • as a percentage of prior-year FedEx trunk revenue block hours
  • with different thresholds depending on whether the Prior Calendar Year Net Aircraft Difference is negative or non-negative.
Basically, if the trunk fleet shrinks, they are now allowed to wet lease with a financial penalty.

Probably the biggest concession of the TA IMO.
Originally Posted by Topgum
Last 2 sentences are spot on.
For Topgum can you explain what it is that is spot on? (or for NotMrNiceGuy since he made the original post and claimed that 1.B.6 was the biggest concession), can you explain how our current scope rules (specifically section 1.B.6) work under the following three scenarios (both under present book, and under the proposed TA). If its such a big concession it should be easy for you to explain exactly what the concession is and why its so much worse than present book. The scenarios are:

1) Net change of zero to the trunk fleet.
2) Net decrease of the trunk fleet.
3) Net increase of the trunk fleet.

Thanks in advance,
Sled
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices