FDX - Deviation Bank
#1
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 0
From: leaning to the left
Does anyone know what this means? Specifically the part I've highlighted in purple regarding being treated separately for deviation bank credit:
CBA 8.C.2.d.All deadhead travel shall be classified into two categories, Front/Back-End, and Mid-Trip. For the purpose of deviation bank credit, each category shall be treated separately. However, if a deadhead trip is changed or canceled by the Company, the associated deadhead bank monies remain intact. Within each category, a pilot’s bank credit shall be determined as set forth in Section 8.C.2.a. (above). 
CBA 8.C.2.d.All deadhead travel shall be classified into two categories, Front/Back-End, and Mid-Trip. For the purpose of deviation bank credit, each category shall be treated separately. However, if a deadhead trip is changed or canceled by the Company, the associated deadhead bank monies remain intact. Within each category, a pilot’s bank credit shall be determined as set forth in Section 8.C.2.a. (above). 
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
Does anyone know what this means? Specifically the part I've highlighted in purple regarding being treated separately for deviation bank credit:
CBA 8.C.2.d.All deadhead travel shall be classified into two categories, Front/Back-End, and Mid-Trip. For the purpose of deviation bank credit, each category shall be treated separately. However, if a deadhead trip is changed or canceled by the Company, the associated deadhead bank monies remain intact. Within each category, a pilot’s bank credit shall be determined as set forth in Section 8.C.2.a. (above). 
CBA 8.C.2.d.All deadhead travel shall be classified into two categories, Front/Back-End, and Mid-Trip. For the purpose of deviation bank credit, each category shall be treated separately. However, if a deadhead trip is changed or canceled by the Company, the associated deadhead bank monies remain intact. Within each category, a pilot’s bank credit shall be determined as set forth in Section 8.C.2.a. (above). 
This fixed a problem under the old CBA. One could have a double DH trip with front DH of $500 and back end DH of $500. The pilot would plan to spend $700 getting into position and $250 getting home at end of trip. Then while on trip, a revision which inserted a $1500 DH would happen and it would eliminate the back end DH. The pilot would have to take the scheduled mid trip as there was no other option that would meet parameters.
The trip started out with a $1000 bank and when the pilot blocked in at base, the bank was $2000 ($500 front and $1500 mid). Since $2000 was greater that $1000, $2000 was the final bank amount. But, $1500 of the $2000 had been used on the scheduled mid trip. Thus, only $500 was left in the bank, yet you had already spent $700 so you were out of pocket $200 due to a "retroactive" pairing revision.
This sounds complex and rare, but it really wasn't. It happened to me at least 5 but not 10 times over the last 7-8 years. I figured it out quickly and never overspent my front end. It happened enough on international trips especially that it was a fix item in negotiations. This splitting out the mid trip DH into its own accounting for accrual fixes this problem--especially since in most cases these late changes required the pilot to take the mid trip DH as scheduled. I asked the question and was assured that even though the banks were accrued separately, they could still be spent as if they were combined. We will see the company interpretation once they implement the programming.
#5
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 0
From: leaning to the left
Old contract all 3 types of DHs were one bank. New contract the mid trip DH was split out into its own accounting. According to NC, you can still spend deviation bank money without regard to bank (treat it like one total) but they are "earned" separately now.
This fixed a problem under the old CBA. One could have a double DH trip with front DH of $500 and back end DH of $500. The pilot would plan to spend $700 getting into position and $250 getting home at end of trip. Then while on trip, a revision which inserted a $1500 DH would happen and it would eliminate the back end DH. The pilot would have to take the scheduled mid trip as there was no other option that would meet parameters.
The trip started out with a $1000 bank and when the pilot blocked in at base, the bank was $2000 ($500 front and $1500 mid). Since $2000 was greater that $1000, $2000 was the final bank amount. But, $1500 of the $2000 had been used on the scheduled mid trip. Thus, only $500 was left in the bank, yet you had already spent $700 so you were out of pocket $200 due to a "retroactive" pairing revision.
This sounds complex and rare, but it really wasn't. It happened to me at least 5 but not 10 times over the last 7-8 years. I figured it out quickly and never overspent my front end. It happened enough on international trips especially that it was a fix item in negotiations. This splitting out the mid trip DH into its own accounting for accrual fixes this problem--especially since in most cases these late changes required the pilot to take the mid trip DH as scheduled. I asked the question and was assured that even though the banks were accrued separately, they could still be spent as if they were combined. We will see the company interpretation once they implement the programming.
This fixed a problem under the old CBA. One could have a double DH trip with front DH of $500 and back end DH of $500. The pilot would plan to spend $700 getting into position and $250 getting home at end of trip. Then while on trip, a revision which inserted a $1500 DH would happen and it would eliminate the back end DH. The pilot would have to take the scheduled mid trip as there was no other option that would meet parameters.
The trip started out with a $1000 bank and when the pilot blocked in at base, the bank was $2000 ($500 front and $1500 mid). Since $2000 was greater that $1000, $2000 was the final bank amount. But, $1500 of the $2000 had been used on the scheduled mid trip. Thus, only $500 was left in the bank, yet you had already spent $700 so you were out of pocket $200 due to a "retroactive" pairing revision.
This sounds complex and rare, but it really wasn't. It happened to me at least 5 but not 10 times over the last 7-8 years. I figured it out quickly and never overspent my front end. It happened enough on international trips especially that it was a fix item in negotiations. This splitting out the mid trip DH into its own accounting for accrual fixes this problem--especially since in most cases these late changes required the pilot to take the mid trip DH as scheduled. I asked the question and was assured that even though the banks were accrued separately, they could still be spent as if they were combined. We will see the company interpretation once they implement the programming.
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 0
However, from the original question, it looks to me like they are separating out the mid trip deviation bank from the front and back. That is a serious giveback, if I'm reading it right. Because, say you have a mid trip deadhead, it stands on it's own. If you spend more to deviate, you can't use the other bank, and if you jumpseat mid trip, the bank can't be used for front and back. I don't know if that's how it will be interpreted, but doesn't that look like how it's written? Bad deal.
#9
Maybe this will come in high on the list of deviation Bank favorites. It's a good thing that we got rid of FIRST CLASS?
Qatar Airways announces plans for world's longest flight - Telegraph
Qatar Airways announces plans for world's longest flight - Telegraph
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



