Search
Notices

FDX-Bid Rumors?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-2016, 06:29 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MEM MD-11 Capt
Posts: 175
Default

100-ish
ol'tigerguy is offline  
Old 03-21-2016, 08:07 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Position: Aeroflot
Posts: 179
Default

170ish 777 Capts
Waldorf is offline  
Old 03-22-2016, 07:06 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: Bus driver
Posts: 322
Default

Are we bidding under the old system, company picks your training date,or the new contractual system, we pick the training date?
Full pull is offline  
Old 03-22-2016, 07:32 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Walrus's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: Socket Drawer
Posts: 1,797
Default

Old system.
The Walrus is offline  
Old 03-22-2016, 06:24 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DaRaiders's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: On the corner, covered in Stickum
Posts: 375
Default

Originally Posted by Waldorf View Post
Heard no slots in Anc. Company wants the base to die from attrition.
Did anybody here go to the meeting in ANC with DD and TL and ask about the future of the ANC domicile?
DaRaiders is offline  
Old 03-23-2016, 06:20 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: Bus driver
Posts: 322
Default

So this MOAB bid will have training assigned for the next few years. Will we ever get a chance to bid for our training dates, as negotiated, before the next contract? The further we go into this contract the more I realize what a turd It is!
Full pull is offline  
Old 03-23-2016, 01:58 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 1559
Posts: 1,533
Default

Nope. Guarantee that the next MOAB, after this MOAB closes and produces a training letter just a few days before implementation of that section.
MX727 is offline  
Old 03-23-2016, 08:58 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,068
Default

Originally Posted by Full pull View Post
So this MOAB bid will have training assigned for the next few years. Will we ever get a chance to bid for our training dates, as negotiated, before the next contract? The further we go into this contract the more I realize what a turd It is!
Big picture wise, I'm not sure that there's a great solution right now for the main problem which is the throughput into/out of the 757/767 fleet. Looking at the training letters, it looks like all the fleets outside of the 75/76 could complete the training from the last bid by December training capacity wise but it would screw up 75/76 staffing because they can't train fast enough on those fleets.

Reading the new sec 24, conceptually it seems to based on the usual status quo around here of all the training letters ending pretty much at the same time going into the next bid. The way I read it, it's probably a better deal for us in general to use the current 24 until the training letters sync up. There is nothing in the new 24 that prohibits the company from denying someone a monthly training award due to new hire training, regulated age, or staffing needs of the FROM position. That's not a massive deal if the training letters are in sync as usual, but look at it now. A whole bunch of people would still be denied training slots due to new hires or staffing needs of their FROM position, i.e. just like the training letter right now, but the new 24 only allows one continuous slot denial payment per training slot (new Passover pay term). Seems like fewer people would get Passover/SDP if they used the new Sec 24 now with the letters out of sync.

Also there's nothing in there that mandates how many and what type of slots the company must offer each month. So let's say someone is going from the 75 to the 76. That's a differences training slot and maybe the company decides not to offer any of those for awhile instead putting out ITU slots and denying people based on new hire or FROM staffing. While I think the new Sec 24 will work largely as written when things are more normal training flow wise, I don't really see a better solution right now from our POV.
Daniel Larusso is offline  
Old 03-24-2016, 12:11 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 482
Default

I think there are a lot of 757 767 sims coming online. If 767 sim passes. Heard common type for 757 767 is going away for all airlines. Anyone hear we accepted 3 767 s and put them in the desert due to lack of pilots?
viperdriver is offline  
Old 03-24-2016, 12:54 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NoHaz's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: let it snow, let it snow, let it snow
Posts: 829
Default

Originally Posted by viperdriver View Post
Heard common type for 757 767 is going away for all airlines.
Probably working on a cargo cutout for that now
NoHaz is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
jsled
United
232
07-24-2016 09:34 AM
tsquare
Major
357
08-07-2010 12:14 PM
990Convair
Cargo
82
11-19-2008 10:39 PM
CAL EWR
Major
35
08-05-2007 07:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices