Search

Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

non precision approaches

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-2007 | 02:54 AM
  #1  
Hondata's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Piper 140 commercial student
Default non precision approaches

I'm starting to do instrument approaches I think i have the ILS down but what would you say is the most difficult non precision approach to do?
Reply
Old 05-23-2007 | 03:35 AM
  #2  
planecrazyjenn's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
From: BE-76
Default

A lot of people say the NDB approach gives them trouble. The hardest part at first is often keeping good situational awareness. If you can picture where you are it'll really help. If you aren't familiar with using a GPS, those approaches can be a little weird at first. VOR's are pretty straight forward. They will all come to you. Practice on flight sim. Call out your altitudes so you don't below through MDA. It's certainly not the real thing, but it'll help you get down procedures...so you don't end up blowing through altitudes on your checkride. I've seen several people do that.
Reply
Old 05-23-2007 | 03:56 AM
  #3  
dbtownley's Avatar
Owner
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: TC-12B (SELRES)
Default

Originally Posted by Hondata
I'm starting to do instrument approaches I think i have the ILS down but what would you say is the most difficult non precision approach to do?
The hardest np approach we do in the King Air is a no heading NDB approach. Basically it is all done with timed turns using the RMI needles. It is a SA tool about where you are on the approach and which direction (and for how long) do you need to turn. However, NDB's are pretty much done, but again it is a SA tool. I have flown some stuck card VORs and TAC in my day.
Reply
Old 05-23-2007 | 08:43 AM
  #4  
the King's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
From: JS32 FO
Default

the hardest NP to do is the one you aren't prepared for. No kidding. We do approaches at an airport 20 miles south. A favorite is a VOR/DME approach with a 10 nm arc. So that gives a student about 5 minutes to brief an approach and set up before they hit the arc. Add wind and you get a real test of cockpit management.

Stay ahead of the aircraft by doing checklists, setting up before the approach, getting WX, etc. and you'll see the approaches are more or less the same.
Reply
Old 05-23-2007 | 10:54 AM
  #5  
FlyerJosh's Avatar
Chief Jeppesen Updater
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,080
Likes: 0
From: Executive Transport Driver
Default

Originally Posted by dbtownley
The hardest np approach we do in the King Air is a no heading NDB approach. Basically it is all done with timed turns using the RMI needles. It is a SA tool about where you are on the approach and which direction (and for how long) do you need to turn. However, NDB's are pretty much done, but again it is a SA tool. I have flown some stuck card VORs and TAC in my day.

Which brings up the question, why would you train for that? I guess that my philosophy has always been train as you fly. Fly as you train. I don't understand training for situations that I'll never encounter? Trust me if I'm doing timed turns to headings in real life, I sure as heck am not going to be shooting an NDB approach. (At least not if you're here in the US).

I understand the Situational Awareness, but there comes a point when you can take a scenario too far...
Reply
Old 05-23-2007 | 01:25 PM
  #6  
PhantomAir's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: C172S, PA44
Default

For me it's the NDB and GPS approaches.
Reply
Old 05-28-2007 | 05:43 AM
  #7  
dbtownley's Avatar
Owner
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: TC-12B (SELRES)
Default

Originally Posted by FlyerJosh
Which brings up the question, why would you train for that? I guess that my philosophy has always been train as you fly. Fly as you train. I don't understand training for situations that I'll never encounter? Trust me if I'm doing timed turns to headings in real life, I sure as heck am not going to be shooting an NDB approach. (At least not if you're here in the US).

I understand the Situational Awareness, but there comes a point when you can take a scenario too far...
Josh,

I totally agree with you as for the "not going to be shooting an NDB (no heading) approach" for real. I have shot some stuck card VOR's and TAC's in the C-2, but the NDB is the only way we have the ability to bulid that type of SA. However, we do not have the ability to "fail" the RMI card without failing the NAV needles too. It comes down to, where am I, where do I need to go, which way do I turn. The other squadron down here flys the T-44 (BE90) and they have a "god box" located in the co-pilot's arm rest. This is a mod that the Navy did for the advanced mulit instrument training. Those aircraft can shoot the stuck card approaches. The Military stills flys aircraft with steam gages and is SLOWLY making its way to RNP. Until we update our planes to digital (EFIS, etc) then we will continue on the path we are doing now. Hopefully, it will be soon.

DT
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
avi8tor4life
Hangar Talk
26
08-24-2011 02:12 PM
wannabepilot
Hangar Talk
6
05-14-2007 03:31 AM
ToiletDuck
Hangar Talk
3
08-17-2006 12:02 PM
AUS_ATC
Hangar Talk
14
03-15-2006 01:22 PM
flier2005
Regional
16
12-29-2005 09:56 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices