Search
Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Logging SFTY Pilot Time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-22-2009, 04:52 PM
  #11  
On Reserve
 
olkev's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: PPL
Posts: 16
Default

I've been thinking of doing some safety pilot work and obviously, I am glad I ran across this post.

So, what is the bottom line here? The letter seems a little vague as it relates to what the safety pilot can log.
olkev is offline  
Old 09-22-2009, 06:34 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MEMpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 204
Default

Originally Posted by NoyGonnaDoIt View Post
I don't think that anyone responded to the PIC part.

In the scenario as you posted it, you can't log PIC time either. Logging PIC as a safety pilot is based on 61.51(e)(1)(iii) – "is acting as pilot in command of an aircraft on which more than one pilot is required..."

IOW, in order to log PIC as a safety pilot, you need to be acting as PIC. You say in your post that the other pilot was the PIC, not you.

So you can't log PIC although, if you want, you may log the time as SIC under 61.51(f)(2)
Incorrect. As long as the arrangement has been set between the two pilots, and one is wearing a view limiting device, then both may log PIC time legally. The problem many have with interpretation is that there is a difference between 'acting pic' and 'logging pic.'
MEMpilot is offline  
Old 09-22-2009, 06:36 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MEMpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 204
Default

I didn't mean to sound curt with the presumptuous 'incorrect.'

apologies
MEMpilot is offline  
Old 09-23-2009, 03:43 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 826
Default

Originally Posted by MEMpilot View Post
I didn't mean to sound curt with the presumptuous 'incorrect.'

apologies
Especially when your "incorrect" is incorrect.

Read the reg (where it says you need to be acting as PIC to log PIC in this case) and the FAA's 16 year old legal opinion: http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/...1993/Hicks.rtf
NoyGonnaDoIt is offline  
Old 09-23-2009, 03:46 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 826
Default

Originally Posted by olkev View Post
I've been thinking of doing some safety pilot work and obviously, I am glad I ran across this post.

So, what is the bottom line here? The letter seems a little vague as it relates to what the safety pilot can log.
The opinion posted earlier deals with logging cross country as a safety pilot.

Check out the FAA Chief Counsel opinion I linked to in response to Mem's post for logging PIC or SIC.

That should cover your question, but for a very unofficial summary FAQ Page
NoyGonnaDoIt is offline  
Old 09-23-2009, 06:55 AM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 37
Default

Originally Posted by NoyGonnaDoIt View Post
The opinion posted earlier deals with logging cross country as a safety pilot.

Check out the FAA Chief Counsel opinion I linked to in response to Mem's post for logging PIC or SIC.

That should cover your question, but for a very unofficial summary FAQ Page
That FAQ page is absolutely incorrect. How can you log SIC time while flying a Part 91 flight where and SIC is not required?

Both pilots in the above operation should log PIC for the time that they are acting as PIC. Pilot A logs the entire flight, and pilot B logs only the time which pilot A is in simulated instrument conditions.
RCFlyer is offline  
Old 09-23-2009, 07:33 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gajre539's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: EMB-170 FO
Posts: 383
Default

The letter on post # 3 was posted at our flight school last week. The second pilot cannot log cross country time but can log safety pilot when the first pilot is under the hood.

I agree, you cannot log SIC in Part 91 where an SIC is not required, but I've seen weirder things in logbooks.
Gajre539 is offline  
Old 09-23-2009, 08:06 AM
  #18  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,281
Default

Originally Posted by Gajre539 View Post
The letter on post # 3 was posted at our flight school last week. The second pilot cannot log cross country time but can log safety pilot when the first pilot is under the hood.

I agree, you cannot log SIC in Part 91 where an SIC is not required, but I've seen weirder things in logbooks.
Correct. There is no such thing as unless the type certificate or the regs in question (usually a 135/121 OPSPEC) require an SIC.

A safety pilot can log total time and PIC. He might as well log both. He can also log category/class (ASEL, AMEL, etc), type, and night if applicable.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 09-23-2009, 10:04 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 826
Default

Originally Posted by RCFlyer View Post
That FAQ page is absolutely incorrect. How can you log SIC time while flying a Part 91 flight where and SIC is not required?
Sorry you don't like the rule as the FAA has interpreted it for a long time.

Read the rule. Read the Chief Counsel opinion. Me, I've given up arguing about this.
NoyGonnaDoIt is offline  
Old 09-23-2009, 10:06 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 826
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Correct. There is no such thing as unless the type certificate or the regs in question (usually a 135/121 OPSPEC) require an SIC..
You mean like FAR 91.109?
NoyGonnaDoIt is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CRMcaptain
Flight Schools and Training
48
10-01-2014 06:38 PM
beebopbogo
Aviation Law
28
08-25-2009 05:06 PM
vagabond
Hiring News
4
04-08-2009 08:03 AM
MrBigAir
Aviation Law
21
11-06-2008 08:00 AM
EmbraerFlyer
Career Questions
4
08-02-2008 02:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices