Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Flight Schools and Training
Will Flight Schools survive in Cali >

Will Flight Schools survive in Cali

Search
Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Will Flight Schools survive in Cali

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-04-2010, 08:41 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SomedayRJ's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: BE50C (A), BE95 (A), C172S (B)
Posts: 349
Default

Originally Posted by Ottopilot View Post
Just one more of a thousand reasons to leave CA. I defected in 1996 after living there for about 30 years (from birth). I don't miss the People's Republic of Kalifornia.
We've lost our way in this state, for sure. I could expand, but we're talking flying here...suffice to say that we no longer have our priorities in order. (As a Californian import, this makes me sad.)

I wonder, though, if a challenge to the law could be made in Federal court. Seems to me California is trying to regulate aviation ( = interstate commerce = no, you can't, as a state)...I'm not a lawyer, but I'm pretty sure regulating aviation and flight schools is an FAA responsibility, not the People's Republic.
SomedayRJ is offline  
Old 07-04-2010, 09:40 AM
  #12  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,480
Default

Originally Posted by slipped View Post
Yeah this place sucks. Nazi Germany
This could be a record for Godwin's Law to kick in!
Fishfreighter is offline  
Old 07-04-2010, 05:54 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SomedayRJ's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: BE50C (A), BE95 (A), C172S (B)
Posts: 349
Default

Originally Posted by Fishfreighter View Post
This could be a record for Godwin's Law to kick in!
Yeah, I'm not sure where that one came from.

Seriously, though...perhaps California's government is a good argument for the republican (small 'r') form of government rather than a direct democracy. Our current form of mob rule has >=75% of the State's budget as mandatory spending through State constitutional amendments, meaning that our legislators get to play with smaller pieces of the pie. Result? Hope you don't like roads, higher education and all the other stuff that built Californian prosperity.
SomedayRJ is offline  
Old 07-04-2010, 07:20 PM
  #14  
Piper Commander
 
Illini's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: PA44 - Right
Posts: 302
Default

What about airlines doing IOE in the state? Who is responsible for the fees? The airline or the Check Airman?
Illini is offline  
Old 07-05-2010, 12:04 PM
  #15  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,261
Default

MOD INPUT: Let's steer clear of general political discussion and stick to the specifics of the aviation issue here.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 07-05-2010, 02:57 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SomedayRJ's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: BE50C (A), BE95 (A), C172S (B)
Posts: 349
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
MOD INPUT: Let's steer clear of general political discussion and stick to the specifics of the aviation issue here.
Yeah, sorry about that...it's just my $0.02 that the current political mess in California created the need for alternative revenues ( = non tax).

I don't know how California plans to enforce this, either. It seems like the INTENT here is to get firms that take large chunks of students' money up front to straighten up and fly right—not saying that these firms don't yet do this, but I can think of a few places (Silver State!) where folks paid for something they didn't get. The side effect is that a lot of folks are gonna get caught up as a side effect.

“Individual flight instructors not having an established place of business other than their residence also were fully exempted from the Reform Act provided they do not negotiate formal contracts of indebtedness or require any advance payments. Exemptions from some, but not all, provisions of the Reform Act also were provided for Flight instruction schools certified by the Federal Aviation Administration that were operating in California on December 31, 1990.”
So I read that as: if you are a 141/142 operator certificated prior to December 31, 1990, or a freelancer, you need not pay, as long as you don't make your students borrow money.
SomedayRJ is offline  
Old 07-06-2010, 05:33 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 585
Default

Head here for the latest updates:
NATA - CA Flight Training Issue Update

No one is exempt. Remember, this is a CA money grab. If you really feel the need to see if you're exempt, fill out the application and pay the $250 application "fee".
jedinein is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scrivener
Flight Schools and Training
3
02-22-2010 03:38 PM
xfzz
Fractional
15
10-27-2009 05:37 PM
Longbow64
Part 135
117
07-23-2009 08:46 AM
Viper25
Aviation Law
18
06-09-2009 11:38 AM
fatmike69
Regional
82
03-02-2009 05:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices