Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Flight Schools and Training
Flying part 121 while flight instructing? >

Flying part 121 while flight instructing?

Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Flying part 121 while flight instructing?

Old 12-02-2010, 06:18 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Sr. VP of button pushing
Posts: 2,726
Default

I think Rick is extrapolating that since you don't need a medical to serve as a CFI* or just a third class, it's not commercial flying. The Feds have come out and said you're being paid to teach, not be a pilot. Whether your Chief Pilot will see it that way is another question.

*(certain conditions apply)
Twin Wasp is offline  
Old 12-02-2010, 08:14 AM
  #12  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,102
Default

Originally Posted by Twin Wasp View Post
I think Rick is extrapolating that since you don't need a medical to serve as a CFI* or just a third class, it's not commercial flying. The Feds have come out and said you're being paid to teach, not be a pilot. Whether your Chief Pilot will see it that way is another question.

*(certain conditions apply)
OK, I did a little poking around. There are several FAA opinions on this, the most recent one I could find references several others and seems to make these conclusions (taking previous findings into account)...

http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/...Martindell.pdf

- Paid flight instruction IS "other commercial flying" for purposes of 135 flight time limits (I think we can assume that would apply to 121 too).

- Any paid 91 flying is "other commercial flying" and counts against flight time limits (obviously).

- Non-paid flight instruction is NOT "other commercial flying" and does not count against any limits. They seem to consider this a recreational activity, which makes sense. Teaching my family member to fly is less tiring than some of the other things I do in my off time.

You have to be careful on the last. "Compensation" can include things other than money. Historically, gifts, hotel accommodations, meals, etc might be considered compensation. In some cases flight time itself might be considered compensation, but I think this would have to be pretty clear-cut, ie a time builder who makes it known to all comers that he will CFI for free to build time. One of the FAA opinions specifically used an example of teaching a spouse as non-compensated CFI work , so teaching a relative or friend should be OK. But if you have a lot of "friends" whom you teach that might raise questions.

This is actually good clarification from the feds, for years there were different opinions, some folks said CFI was commercial flying whether paid or not because you needed a commercial ticket. Others said it was not commercial flying because you don't need a medical.

These opinions don't address the affect of "other commercial flying" on 135/121 duty/rest, I'll try to look that up later.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-02-2010, 08:23 AM
  #13  
Flying Farmer
 
Ewfflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Posts: 3,160
Default

I would agree with the last post, that makes the most sense and actually seems reasonable!
Ewfflyer is offline  
Old 12-02-2010, 09:45 AM
  #14  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
mikerizzo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 13
Default

It seems a lot of you are getting hung up on the "free" part. I'm planning on instruction my nephew.
mikerizzo is offline  
Old 12-02-2010, 10:53 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,835
Default

Originally Posted by mikerizzo View Post
It seems a lot of you are getting hung up on the "free" part. I'm planning on instruction my nephew.
I would think that if you intune with the professional pilot world that you would understand why professional pilots (those who fly for a living) would be "hung up" on someone working for free.
If you were in tune, then you might have given an added word or two to make it more clear to those professional pilots that I am assuming you knew would be reading your post and circumvent the chance that someone would take exception with the thought of instructing for free.

Glad it was a miscommunication.
Hope the responses from this thread have been helpful to you.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 12-02-2010, 04:13 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
jonnyjetprop's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,408
Default

There's another hang up on "free"

The FAA has been cracking down on concept of "compensation". We all know the idea of money, but the FAA has taken it to the next level. Good will, flight time and favors all form compensation in the eyes of the FAA.

I think that instructing a family member would be fine.




Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
I would think that if you intune with the professional pilot world that you would understand why professional pilots (those who fly for a living) would be "hung up" on someone working for free.
If you were in tune, then you might have given an added word or two to make it more clear to those professional pilots that I am assuming you knew would be reading your post and circumvent the chance that someone would take exception with the thought of instructing for free.

Glad it was a miscommunication.
Hope the responses from this thread have been helpful to you.

USMCFLYR
jonnyjetprop is offline  
Old 03-06-2012, 08:00 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 373
Default

I know this is a dated post, and I ran across it by purely by chance, but after reading the legal interpretation I do have a question...


So the letter states that the flight time does not count towards the commercial time IF the instructor isn't getting paid for the FLIGHT instruction.

Ok, so what about getting paid for the ground time before and after the flight, not charging the student for the instruction time, specifying on the receipts that the monies recived was for ground only, and not logging the time so that you're not getting compensated by accruing hours.



I know it's gray area, splitting hairs rediculousness..I'm not suggesting this as a way to intentionally circumvent the rules but rather as a "just in case measure" to prevent exceeding the flight times.

Thoughts?
Stratapilot is offline  
Old 03-07-2012, 02:20 AM
  #18  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,102
Default

Originally Posted by Stratapilot View Post
I know this is a dated post, and I ran across it by purely by chance, but after reading the legal interpretation I do have a question...


So the letter states that the flight time does not count towards the commercial time IF the instructor isn't getting paid for the FLIGHT instruction.

Ok, so what about getting paid for the ground time before and after the flight, not charging the student for the instruction time, specifying on the receipts that the monies recived was for ground only, and not logging the time so that you're not getting compensated by accruing hours.



I know it's gray area, splitting hairs rediculousness..I'm not suggesting this as a way to intentionally circumvent the rules but rather as a "just in case measure" to prevent exceeding the flight times.

Thoughts?

I think that would open you up to trouble. It establishes that there is a professional/commercial relationship between you and the student and raises serious doubts that this is a recreational activity.

What if you are just shifting the fee for flight training into the ground fees?

What if you are getting paid cash for the ground, but your compensation for the flying is the logged time?

I think you would get burned doing this.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-07-2012, 04:26 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 373
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
I think that would open you up to trouble. It establishes that there is a professional/commercial relationship between you and the student and raises serious doubts that this is a recreational activity.

What if you are just shifting the fee for flight training into the ground fees?

What if you are getting paid cash for the ground, but your compensation for the flying is the logged time?

I think you would get burned doing this.

(Shrugs) That's idea, correct me if in wrong but the letter never specifies the intended relationship, but rather stops at saying "If you get paid for it, it's commercial"


And if you're getting paid cash, not collecting receipts, and not logging the time, then There is nothing to show that you were getting compensated at all, and nothing for the FAA to go off of except the students testimony in court. But of course this is assuming something really, really, really bad happeneds.

I guess the only real safe guard in doing this would be to fly to not charge the student if you inadvertently went over you rest times.
Stratapilot is offline  
Old 03-07-2012, 01:52 PM
  #20  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,102
Default

Originally Posted by Stratapilot View Post
(Shrugs) That's idea, correct me if in wrong but the letter never specifies the intended relationship, but rather stops at saying "If you get paid for it, it's commercial"


And if you're getting paid cash, not collecting receipts, and not logging the time, then There is nothing to show that you were getting compensated at all, and nothing for the FAA to go off of except the students testimony in court. But of course this is assuming something really, really, really bad happeneds.

I guess the only real safe guard in doing this would be to fly to not charge the student if you inadvertently went over you rest times.
The FAA is not bound by the restraints typical of criminal law when pursuing violations of regs for administrative action. They can interpret things any way they want, and the only appeal is to the NTSB...which almost always sides with the FAA.

Any time a young up-and-comer is instructing they assume you are doing it for a reason....either money up front or under the table, or flight time. They will be very suspicious of anyone giving it away for free unless it's a relative. If they are suspicious, they dig until they figure it out.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gajre539
The Boneyard
0
07-19-2010 01:45 PM
Sniper
Aviation Law
13
11-15-2009 08:16 PM
MobiusOne
Foreign
12
05-09-2008 09:37 PM
joel payne
Hangar Talk
9
03-18-2008 07:21 PM
N618FT
Regional
33
11-19-2007 07:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices